It was a week where the White House provided a steady stream of "what ifs." Iran, Greenland, credit card caps, Fed subpoenas, and aid for home buyers were just some of the topics floated. Take it all with a grain of salt.

 

The overall market indexes traded in a tight range, but by the end of the week, they continued to edge higher. If you were invested in cyclical areas, you did far better than that. As I have pointed out in my last few columns, a rotation away from the concentrated group of tech stocks is well underway into cyclical areas like materials, industrials, health care, consumer discretionary, and small-cap stocks.

 

I think that will continue as tax cuts, increased government spending, and a reduction in tariffs take hold in the economy. Remember, this is an election year, and as such, the administration is determined to short-circuit the "affordability" issue because it has played so well in GOP election defeats in recent years.

 

Some examples include the president's desire to cap credit card interest rates at 10 percent for one year, which would require congressional approval. Top Republicans are already resisting such a move. However, it did not stop traders from trashing a whole host of financial stocks on this "what if" scenario.

 

Trump also wants to reduce rising electricity prices by opening a bidding war for tech companies to fund new power plants, and he also proposed "the great health-care plan," which he claims will lower drug prices, increase transparency, and redirect federal subsidies to consumers.

 

On the housing front, the president wants to spend $200 billion or more in buying mortgage bonds through Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the two government-controlled mortgage agencies. The president hopes the move will reduce housing costs by lowering mortgage interest rates.

 

Speaking of interest rates, the DOJ Fed subpoena announcement was meant to put pressure on Chair Jerome Powell to vacate the office sooner rather than later. The rather uncharacteristic response from the beleaguered central bank chairman on social media prompted the White House to backpedal on that move almost immediately.

 

Trump also said that he wants to bar Wall Street financial institutions from buying single-family homes. Professional house flippers are believed to have artificially inflated housing prices in many communities. It is not clear to me if that would have a big impact on the housing market, but one can hope. In any case, housing stocks took off after Trump's social media post.

 

And while these trial balloons are floating out of the Oval Office windows, Trump's gunship diplomacy is forging full steam ahead. Venezuela was last week's story, largely replaced by threats of military action in both Iran and Greenland. While equity and bond markets took this saber-rattling in stride, the precious metals and oil markets spiked higher as the fear factor of geopolitical turmoil took hold.

 

To me, Trump's escapades overseas are part of the mercantilist tone of his administration. For those who missed my December 2024 column "Is mercantilism the answer to our trade imbalance," I suggest you read it. It begins with:

 

"For those few of us familiar with the term, mercantilism was the dominant economic system in Europe from the 16th to the 18th centuries. It was a world where it was believed that global wealth was fixed and finite. To become powerful, a nation needed to acquire as much wealth as possible. Back then, a nation's wealth was measured by how much gold and silver it accumulated."

 

Certainly, in mercantilist terms, the controversy over strategic metals fits the bill as does oil in the case of Venezuela and Iran when discussing wealth as fixed and finite.

 

Markets feel a bit tired to me. We still have not received a verdict on the tariff question, but at the end of the week, I noticed some overdue profit-taking in the mines and metals sector.

 

The threat of additional tariffs on metals may have fueled some of the recent gains in that space. A negative ruling by the Supreme Court might create further volatility in that area and in other cyclical sectors that have benefited most from the rotation we have seen over the last two weeks.

 

I would not chase equities here. Instead, there may be a buying opportunity if we pull back in areas such as small-cap stocks, industrials, and miners of gold, silver, copper, platinum, and palladium. Emerging markets are also hitting new highs. China may be worth a fresh look as well.

 

The college-age generation is grappling with inflation, increasing housing prices, climate change, and now mass corporate layoffs. In a world where geopolitical turmoil is increasing, the ground beneath their feet is shifting. Many believe their future is bleak.

 

My nephew, Joey, just got married. His wife lives with her parents, and he lives with his. While he makes good money as a pharmacy manager at a national chain drugstore, neither he nor his wife can afford even a down payment on a house in Long Island. They are moving in with the wife's parents. Joey's sister is also married, with two children. They also live with their parents. Welcome to the American dream turned nightmare for almost 70 million young Americans.

 

The typical age range of Gen Z is 1997 to 2012. They are the demographic cohort succeeding Millennials and preceding Generation Alpha. They are the most racially and ethnically diverse generation in America, with 48 percent being non-white.

 

Almost all of this generation is highly active on social media. Almost 60 percent are planning to pursue a college education. They are just as likely to identify as Republicans, Democrats, or independents. As such, the present populist upheaval the U.S. is undergoing takes an inordinate toll on them. It may be why 91 percent of Gen Zers report experiencing symptoms of stress and anxiety.

 

While Wall Street opened the year celebrating the promise of a bright future, thanks to AI. Opinion leaders predict that artificial intelligence, robots, and space, among other technological breakthroughs, will dramatically reshape the way the world works. For college grads, all they see is a no-fire, no-hire labor market where unemployment among workers ages 20 to 24 continues to rise. It is now to 5.3 percent and even worse for those younger than that.

 

The National Association of Colleges and Employers predict the entry-level hiring crisis will worsen this year, rating job prospects as poor or at best fair. At a recent gathering of employers at the Yale School of Management, 66 percent admitted they planned to cut jobs or freeze hiring.

 

With an economy that is expected to grow by 3 percent in 2026, one would have expected the opposite reaction, but then you would not be reckoning with the impact of artificial intelligence on the job market. Potential employers are concerned and uncertain about how AI might reshape the workforce over the next few years, and rightfully so.

 

Most analysts believe that many white-collar positions, especially at the entry level, will be replaced by technological advancement. Underscoring that concern, many corporate giants, including Amazon, UPS, Target, and Google, announced layoffs affecting more than 60,000 jobs. And to many, that is just the tip of the iceberg.

 

Faced with taking fast-food jobs at minimum wage and lacking work experience in their hoped-for professions, 3 in 5 Gen Z workers are looking elsewhere for a job with some kind of reasonable future. Almost half of these young workers believe the blue-collar jobs may offer better long-term security than corporate work in the technology fields. The top sectors pursued by Gen Z include plumbing, automotive repair, construction, and electrical work.

 

I happen to agree with that belief, but unfortunately, Gen Z applicants face the same barrier to entry in their white-collar arena — lack of experience. Many job applicants, regardless of industry, are now required to have at least three years of experience and up to five years before being considered.

 

The lure of six-figure salaries in the blue-collar area is attracting more Gen Zs to vocational schools. However, what many conveniently forget is that earning that kind of take-home pay requires years of experience, a substantial investment in personal tools and equipment, and serious wear and tear on the body.

 

As I write this, in the next room, a 65-year-old builder I'll call Scott, who is going in for his second knee replacement next month, is building another room in our condo. Assisting him is a young Gen Zer. There is a constant stream of chatter as Scott talks through his drywalling process. His helper listens intently. They seem eager to learn and ask questions as they work. He did the same when he placed the struts and erected the wall.

 

For several years, Scott has been involved in a local high school program that teaches vocational school grads his business, while they gain on-the-job experience and a paycheck. Scott and others like him are providing a solution one day at a time. He is one answer to the dilemma facing this struggling generation. This country needs more Scotts to hire and teach a young workforce in need.

 

Next week, I will highlight one area where many Gen Xers have found an alternative to home ownership. It holds risks but doesn't cost an arm and a leg to get involved.

 

It was a tumultuous week on the geopolitical front for the country, but markets took it in stride. The good news is that markets continue to climb, but for how long?

 

Since the beginning of the year, I have seen a fair amount of rotation, something I have suggested could happen. The years of overinvestment in a handful of names appear to be coming to an end as investors go further afield in search of new purchases. For the first time since 2022, value is beginning to outperform growth. Industrials, small caps, financials, health care, defense, and materials seem to be areas where new money is gravitating.

 

All of this is happening under the surface, so just looking at the main averages may be deceiving. Rotation is a good thing and does not automatically mean deterioration. It may feel that way if you are one of the many who are overweight in the MAG 7, AI Five, or some variation of that theme. I suspect that in 2026, those companies that can show they can monetize their investment in AI will thrive; otherwise, not so much.

 

In the meantime, the price action in precious metals has been hair-raising over the past week, especially in silver, platinum, and palladium. I am talking about daily moves of greater than 5 percent in some cases. It is why I have urged readers in the past to be involved but not to bet the farm on this asset class. I hold a similar attitude toward crypto.

 

I am still bullish on both if the U.S. dollar continues to decline. The Trump administration's unstated policy is to weaken the dollar further. In this era of tariffs, a weaker dollar strengthens the competitive position for U.S. exports. It is that simple. As a result, global investors, including central banks, need an alternative to dollar-denominated assets. Precious metals and other commodities are one way to satisfy that need.

 

I believe state capitalism and the new role of the government asventure capitalist will continue to be an investment theme. There will be more companies like Intel and MP Materials that receive taxpayer investments based on their “strategic” importance. What will make one company, rather than another, the recipient of federal largesse will likely depend on the number of visits to Mar-A-Lago.

 

I won't review the news from Venezuela over the past week. Everything readers needed to know concerning Trump's Gunboat (maybe, gunship?) Diplomacy in Venezuela was published in two of my columns in mid-November. My explanation and predictions have indeed come to pass. The bottom line from an investment view is that repairing and developing that country's energy production will take years. The only short-term winners will be U.S. Gulf Coast refiners, and their stock prices already reflect the news.

 

Notice how the president's actions on Venezuela, followed by his desire to increase defense spending by half to $1.5 trillion in 2027, have effectively wiped affordability and the Obamacare insurance premiums issues from the headlines. His Gunship diplomacy is now focused on Greenland, while his resurrection of the Monroe Doctrine in the Western Hemisphere is keeping allies and enemies alike off balance. As a tactician in a mid-term election year, his antics are brilliant. What it says about America will likely be determined by an increasingly populist society during the election process.

 

As I have explained previously, we are still experiencing the global end-of-year flow of funds, which has culminated in the stock market hitting record highs over the last week or so. The latest non-farm payroll number for December came in slightly lower than estimated, adding 50,000 jobs versus the 70,000 estimated. That is the kind of number the Fed wants to see to keep inflation on track.

 

We are still awaiting the Supreme Court decision on tariffs, which many expected to be announced today, January 9. It wasn't. Whatever their decision, it is a toss-up how markets will react. If the tariffs are thrown out, the persistent price inflation caused by these policies will be reduced. That will boost consumer spending and growth. At the same time, the deficit will increase because less tariff revenue will flow into the U.S. Treasury, which has been used to reduce the deficit. If, on the other hand, the court backs the president, expect expectations of higher inflation, lower growth, and more tariffs to rise.

 

For elderly Americans suffering through this affordability crisis, every little bit helps. Inflation and tariffs have made everything more expensive, so a boost to your Social Security monthly checks is welcome, but it's no cure for what ails us.

 

Given that inflation is "officially" hovering around 3 percent per year, a 2.8 percent boost in cost-of-living adjustment (COLA) for 2026 is good news. This follows a 2.5 percent increase in 2025. The Social Security Administration estimates that the average retirement benefit will jump by $56 a month, from $2,015 to $2,071, starting this month.

 

From my point of view (and I am sure yours), this raise will in no way cover the spike in consumer prices we are feeling. But before you can even count the money, remember that the standard monthly premium for Medicare Part B is going to hit you with a 9.7 percent increase. That means you need to subtract this additional $17.90 from the COLA benefit, so the cost to cover doctor visits and other outpatient care will climb in January from $185 to $202.90.

 

What could help retirees even more will be the 2026 federal senior "bonus" deduction. For the coming year (returns filed in 2027), seniors aged 65 and older can claim a new but temporary tax break. The deduction you can claim for individual filers is up to $6,000 and $12,000 for married couples filing jointly. However, there are income limits on this deduction.

 

For a married couple, your Modified Adjusted Gross Income can be no higher than $150,000; for single filers, $75,000. If you exceed those levels, there is a phase-out scheme in which benefits are reduced until an Individual earns $175,000 and $250,000 for couples. These benefits can be claimed whether you itemize or take the standard deduction on your taxes.

 

In addition to the new $6,000 bonus, standard deduction amounts have also increased for 2026. What that means is that if you are filing separately, you can deduct $16,100 from your taxes, up from $15,759 in 2025. For married couples filing jointly, the new amount is $32,200. There is also an additional senior deduction for anyone over 65. If you file as a single, singles receive an extra $2,50, while married taxpayers or surviving spouses receive $1,650 each.

 

As an example, a married couple over 65 taking the standard deduction could potentially shield up to $47,500 from federal income tax ($32,200 standard deduction plus $3,300 additional senior deduction plus $12,000 from the "bonus" payment.)

 

The affordability crisis has affected seniors in many ways. Over one-third of seniors 65 and older were struggling with housing affordability. Over 12 million households were paying more than 30 percent of their income on housing, according to a Harvard University joint study.

 

The bottom 20 percent of Americans aged 60 and older have no assets, and many of them are in debt. Almost half have an average income below what they need to cover basic needs. Failing health is a constant fear for 60 percent of all older adults. Most cannot afford two years of in-home, long-term services and support. Over 80 percent do not have the resources to pay for long-term care or be able to weather financial emergencies.

 

The affordability gap has just gotten worse. And as we enter 2026, 22 million Americans, many of them seniors, especially early retirees who are not yet eligible for Medicare, are facing the end of the enhanced premium subsidies under the Affordable Care Act. Some face a doubling of health-care coverage costs as a result.

 

All in all, most seniors are facing dire straits in this country. Legislators seem to be oblivious to their predicament. Even their scant remedies are temporary at best, like the "bonus" credit to Social Security that expires in 2028. The majority in Congress wants to get rid of Obamacare but has no alternative to the out-of-control costs of our failing health system. 

 

They say we can’t afford Social Security or Medicare but are at a loss for a workable alternative. Will anything change in 2026? I doubt it.

 

For those who have been wondering whether the Santa Claus Rally would occur this year, it appears that Santa is already on the roof. The stock market gained almost all of this holiday-shortened week on lighter volume. Can we expect the same next week?

 

Normally, investors can expect gains of 1-2 percent between now and the end of the first week in January. Markets were closed early on Wednesday and reopened on Friday. Six straight days of gains were a good start with the S&P 500 Index hitting a new record high.

 

I have advised readers not to put too much credence in these gains. The upward pressure on stocks stems more from global fund flows than from anything specific to the stock market. Still, it is a bit like having a snowfall on Christmas. It makes the holiday season a little more cheerful. And I hope you all had a wonderful week!

 

The big news had to be the third quarter release of Gross Domestic Product (GDP). Following a 3.8 percent gain in the second quarter, GDP grew by 4.3 percent on an annualized basis last quarter. That was way beyond economists' estimates.

 

The gains were largely driven by robust consumer spending, but since then, momentum has faded amid a rising cost of living. The administration is steadfast in its belief that GDP will rise by 3 percent in 2026. The Congressional Budget Office has estimated that the government shutdown could shave anywhere from 1-2 percent off GDP in the fourth quarter.

 

That may be so, but a word of caution on the government data. There is no guarantee that the recent data released by the Bureau of Labor Statistics is as accurate or unbiased as it was in the past. Just so you know, the Congressional Budget Office has estimated that the government shutdown could shave anywhere from 1-2 percent from GDP in the fourth quarter.

 

While U.S. stocks did well this year, the real outperformers in 2025 were precious metals and other commodities. Over the festive dinner table this year, the topic of conversation among friends and relatives was not about crypto for a change. No, this year it was about gold and silver prices. "And what about palladium and platinum?"

 

Readers know that was my favored asset class throughout the year. The numbers speak for themselves: gold gained 70 percent, palladium 62 percent, silver 150 percent, and platinum 150 percent. A combination of central bank buying, inflation, tariff fears, and weakness in the dollar has catapulted this group to record high after record high.

 

Recently, new buying has surfaced due to the Section 232 investigations prompted by the White House. These investigations are a first step in determining whether tariffs should be applied to this asset class. If the answer is yes on tariffs, then expect more gains. But it is not just the rabbit and the hare (precious metals) that have attracted my interest; there is a turtle in this race that I am watching as well.

 

Copper, while "only" up 35-40 percent this year, appears to me to have a bright future. As a mining guy back in the day, I know that most often, where there are copper deposits, there is also silver and gold. The three metals are highly correlated, although only silver and copper have industrial uses.

 

In the case of copper, its uses are endless. This lowly metal is everywhere. A great conductor of electricity and heat, it has been part of human history for thousands of years. Today, the combination of mining outages and the need for massive quantities of copper to build new power grids, energy infrastructure, electric vehicles, and AI data centers should support copper prices in the coming years.

 

There is not much I can say about the coming week. It should be a replay of this past week — few players, less volume, fewer trading days, and higher global cash flows. That should propel markets to higher highs, but remember the party should end at least temporarily by the middle of January. Happy New Year to one and all.