@theMarket: Markets Maintain Higher Levels despite Bad News

By Bill SchmickiBerkshires Columnist
Print Story | Email Story
Bill Schmick
Despite Friday's blow up of the Detroit bailout, the massive layoffs from every corner of America and the revelation of an alleged $50 billion Ponzi-scheme from one of Wall Street's top brokers, Bernard Madoff, the U.S. market is hanging in there. Can investors continue to shake off bad news and for how long?

The ongoing drama between the politicians and the automakers rivals the on-again, off-again circus of the first $750 billion Wall Street bailout we lived through a few months back. Ostensibly, the $14 billion deal struck in the House came apart in the Senate on Thursday night when the UAW's Ron Gettelfinger refused to bow to the senators' demands that the union reduce wages ($75/hour) to a level prevalent among non-union shops ($43/hour).

Underneath the GOP senators' "free market" resistance to the bailout is an age-old rivalry between Republicans and the auto workers union. The union has provided a powerful and traditional source of money and election workers for the Democratic Party for decades. The GOP sees the crisis of the Big Three as a means to break the back of labor hopefully for good. If there is no bailout, so the thinking goes, then the automakers would be forced into bankruptcy. Under that legal process, the courts could mandate vast changes in union wages, contracts and other areas without interference as a condition for eventually re-emerging from bankruptcy.

Both sides have a point. I can't see how the American car makers can compete, regardless of any bailout with such a huge differential in labor costs, not to mention the onus of unworkable union rules and regulations on what company management can and can't do on the assembly line (see my column "The Big Three Should Become the Big One"). At the same time, if Gettlefinger agreed to such a deal the union body would lynch him. Like all Americans, the auto workers are struggling with recession, higher prices, and higher unemployment as it is. I suspect a 57 percent cut in their wages would have hundreds of thousands of workers on strike and in the streets. How would that help GM or Chrysler?

General Motors, who did not take kindly to the rebuff of its loan request, upped the ante on Friday by announcing the closing of 20 North American plants by the first quarter of next year. That would not only reduce production by 250,000 vehicles but would throw hundreds of thousands of workers into the unemployment lines at least temporarily.


Given that, I expect President Bush will relent in his opposition to using any of the $750 billion bank bailout money for the automakers. So by Monday I can predict with some surety that a deal will be struck to provide enough money to GM and Chrysler (Ford says it doesn't need any immediate cash right now) to at least tide them over until the whole mess becomes Obama's problem.

As for the alleged swindle perpetrated over several years by the ex-chairman of the NASDAQ Stock Market, Bernie Madoff, what can I say? His own sons turned him in. If true, his actions seem to exemplify the greed and dishonesty of Wall Street and will just drive another nail into the coffin of the financial sector. Still, none of this bad news seems to have swayed investors in their determination to have what they want most, a Christmas rally.

By the end of the week the markets managed to overcome everything from crappy earnings, the highest unemployment increase in 34 years, scandals, bankruptcies and even one or two kitchen sinks only to end slightly higher from a week ago last Friday. You have to admire the bulls; if nothing else, they have determination.

Bill Schmick is a licensed investment adviser representative and portfolio strategist as well as a registered financial planner with Berkshire-based Dion Money Management, which manages more than $500 million for middle-class Americans from coast to coast. Direct your inquires to Bill at 1-877-850-7942, Ext. 146, (toll-free) or e-mail him at wschmick@dionmm.com. You can also visit www.afewdollarsmore.com for more of Bill's insight.
If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Lanesborough Passes FY 2027 Budget, Warrant Articles

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff
LANESBOROUGH, Mass. — Town meeting on Tuesday approved an almost $14 million fiscal 2027 budget, and approved bylaws for short-term rentals and signage, and for public safety vehicles. 
 
Of the 20 warrant articles, one, Article 7, to use free cash to pay prior fiscal year bills of $941.27 was indefinitely postponed by Moderator David Rolle because the bills were for the fire association.
 
Some 247 of the town's more than 2,600 registered voters filled Lanesborough Elementary School, debating articles during a meeting that lasted more than three hours. 
 
The town's 2027 spending plan is up more than 10 percent, with the main increases from higher enrollment in the regional schools and the McCann Technical School renovation project.
 
Voters approved the assessment of $7,586,284 for Mount Greylock Regional School. They also approved Article 11, which was the use of $16,298.48 in free cash for the McCann's roof and window replacement project so as not to impact the budget. 
 
Ambulance Director Jen Weber is planning 24-hour coverage, which means more staff and a hike in her budget. Article 5 asked the town to appropriate $234,100 to operate the Ambulance Enterprise Fund for salaries and expenses, which passed.
 
Fire Chief Jeff DeChaine spoke to the audience on his articles and the need for a new truck to replace the 1996 fire truck, listed on the warrant articles for a total $813,366, which includes a $100,000 contingency cost on whether a 2026 model-year chassis can be secured before new emissions standards in 2027. If they get the 2026 chassis, that contingency likely won't be needed.
 
View Full Story

More Stories