@theMarket: A Good Week for the Bulls

By Bill SchmickiBerkshires Columnist
Print Story | Email Story
Bill Schmick
The bear market bounce that began two weeks ago is alive and well. The S&P500 index hit the 800 level on Wednesday and then pulled back for the next two days. 

This consolidation is a good sign (the pause that refreshes) and I expect the markets to move higher sometime next week. However, several important themes are developing beneath the headline grabbing news of AIG bonuses, the Federal Reserve's intention to buy U.S. Treasury bonds and the contemplated changes in the nation's "mark-to-market" accounting rules.

Last Sunday the nation and Congress were outraged with the AIG revelation that $165 million in bonuses were paid out to their employees.

"I hope they make them give back every cent of that money," said one angry shopper at the checkout counter in the North Adam's Stop & Shop this week. Everyone in line, including me, voiced agreement.

Yet very few seemed to care or even read in the same announcement that of the $182 billion of taxpayer money doled out to AIG so far, $28 billion was paid out to just five U.S. banks: Goldman Sachs, Merrill Lynch, Bank of America, Citigroup and Wachovia. Beyond that, another $25.5 billion ended up in the pockets of four foreign banks: Deutsche Bank of Germany, Societe Generale of France, Barclays of Britain and UBS of Switzerland.

This is on top of $22 billion which had already been transferred to companies in September that were holding AIG’s shakiest derivative contracts. I know it is hard to keep straight, (what with all these zeros being thrown around) but readers may recall that AIG received an initial bailout payment of $85 billion back in September 2008. 

The bottom line is that about 50 percent of the money we have given to AIG to date has ended up in the hands of other companies that were themselves recipients of bail-out funds.  And we have no idea what they did with that money.


On another front, the announcement on Wednesday that the Federal Reserve would begin buying as much as $1.2 trillion of government debt and mortgage-backed securities had a beneficial impact on one of my recommendations - U.S. Treasury bonds. The bond market soared after the news while the U.S. dollar (another recommendation) dropped over 2 percent.

But the news ignited fears of inflation as well. Precious metals, which just before the announcement were trading at the very bottom of my recommended range, staged a spectacular rally. Investors in both the stock and bond markets, while applauding the news, realize that the Fed's strategy of buying government debt to pay for all this deficit spending ($2 trillion as of Friday) will mean printing more money and more inflation. Investors piled into inflation hedges like gold, silver and a variety of other commodities within minutes of the announcement.

I believe stocks are still on track to reach my target of 840 on the S&P500 Index in this bounce.  One reason for my short-term bullishness is the rumored change in mark-to-market rules.  Presently companies are required to mark all their assets to their market price. This is a problem for troubled financial companies with worthless toxic assets on their books since each quarter they are forced to write-off billions in losses. If the rules were suspended, the losses would go away and suddenly sick banks would look healthy again.

Yes, I know that's a bit like now you see it now you don't parlor tricks but the government seems willing to try anything to get the financial sector going again. I suspect investors, desperate to recoup last year’s losses, would buy now and worry later. Remember though that the financial sector is already up 42 percent since early March so much of this news is already discounted.

If we do reach my S&P target, the gain from this latest market bottom of 666 (a very unlucky number) would be 26 percent if you bought at the low. That's slightly higher than the last bounce of 24 percent after the November 2008 lows. Readers should be advised that my S&P 840 is a moving target.

We could easily over or under shoot that number. Many readers have called or e-mailed me asking what would happen if the market broke my upside target. All I will say right now is keep reading and hoping.
If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Pittsfield Council Passes $232.7M Budget

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The City Council unanimously approved a $232.7 million budget for the upcoming fiscal year. 

It is a modest, almost 2.9 percent increase from FY26. 

"I do want to give the community kind of a heads up as we move forward on budgets. What we see coming out of the federal government that's trickling down to the states, it's going to be harder and harder for us as a community to meet our needs under the Proposition 2 1/2," Councilor at Large Alisa Costa said. 

"We're going to have challenges, as we've seen communities across the state trying to override the Proposition 2 1/2, because we have dwindling amounts of money coming from the state and federal government." 

She pointed out that, at the same time, utility bills are going up for both residents and the city, as are the costs of pavement and other items. 

The amended budget of $232,777,720, down from the $232,782,090 originally proposed, includes cuts to the Department of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion and the restoration of funds for councilors to attend the annual Massachusetts Municipal Association conference. 

The Pittsfield Public Schools' $86,855,061 budget includes $68,886,061 in state Chapter 70 funding and $18 million from the city. With $345,000 in school choice and Richmond tuition revenues, it totals $87,200,061 and is an approximately $300,000 increase from the Pittsfield Public Schools' FY26 budget of $86.9 million. 

The district's budget will fund 13 schools, as Morningside Community School will retire in the fall, and includes the middle school restructuring. 

Councilors also approved the use of $2 million in certified free cash to reduce the tax rate, and appropriated $450,551 for parking-related expenditures. 

View Full Story

More Stories