image description

Williamstown Board Splits on Voting Hours, Blair Lot

By Tammy DanielsiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story
Pam Malumphy
WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass. — Despite the lack of contests in this year's town election, the Selectmen split on reducing the number of hours the polls will be open.

The issue of election hours provoked the most discussion in the review of the warrant at Monday night's Selectmen's meeting.

Town Clerk Mary Kennedy had requested that polling hours be set from 11 a.m. to 7 p.m. on Tuesday, May 12, rather than the normal 7 a.m. to 8 p.m. The cost to run an election was estimated at about $111 an hour, meaning the town could save $555 by shortening election hours.

Selectmen David Rempell and Thomas Costley, however, questioned the impression the town would be sending about voting and how it would affect voters. Selectman Richard Steege was concerned about disrupting voting patterns, believing if someone usually voted before going to work, and couldn't this time, they might not bother the next time.

"The reality of the situation is that it will make it more difficult for people to vote," said Rempell, who indicated he would vote yes if the consequences were understood. "I think we are making a statement that it isn't as important to vote."

Every office on the ballot has one candidate; there are no ballot questions. Town Manager Peter Fohlin said the town had had shortened hours in the 1990s, starting at about 10 or 11 in the morning.

"I hate to think we're doing this because we don't want people to vote," said Chairwoman Jane Allen, who added that if there were races on the ballot, the board would not want to do anything to affect turnout, and therefore, any contests.

"I'm not persuaded that $500 is worth saving," said Costley in voting no. "I think it's a message that we send on the importance of our democracy."

Costley was joined by Steege; Allen and Rempell voted in the affirmative. With Selectman Ronald Turbin absent. the vote was deadlocked. The motion was made to restore the original hours of 7 a.m. to 8 p.m., which was passed unanimously.

The rest of the review of the 34-article warrant went fairly smoothly since many of the issues had been previously discussed.

Pam Malumphy, regional director of the state Office of Business Development in Pittsfield, appeared before the board to discuss aspects of Article 31, which if approved would designate the town's various business districts as economic opportunity areas.

Establishing economic opportunity areas would open up incentives such as 10 percent in tax credits for businesses taking over abandoned buildings and 5 percent investment tax credits. "That automatic tax credit is really a wonderful carrot, said Malumphy.


Selectmen Chairwoman Jane Allen confers with Selectman David Rempell.
The town could also sweeten deals by offering its own incremental-tax plans to lure businesses, but that would be "a locally driven" incentive, she said.


Fohlin said the town has several parcels that were designated EOAs — the 1896 House, the former Grand Union property and the Wild Oats Marketplace property. The idea of creating larger EOAs had arisen during talks between himself, Malumphy and Ariel Sutain about the defunct Taconic Restaurant, which Sutain owns.

"It dawned on me that there are other parcels along Route 7 that would benefit," said Fohlin. It would be easier to make all business districts — limited, planned, tourist and village — economic opportunity areas rather than doing each one separately as they came up. Rather, he said, the town could decide incremental tax packages on a case-by-case basis.

"It is very, very widely used," said Malumphy to the board. "Go for it."

The board voted to recommend that article, as did the Finance Committee, and all other articles without opposition with the exception of Article 28, which if approved would make the so-called Blair Lot surplus municipal property and give the Selectmen authority to sell it to the state Fish and Wildlife Department if they deem the price is right.

The possible sale has been discussed at length at both Selectmen and Finance Committee meetings; the Finance Committee has decided to make its recommendation at town meeting. Costley, pointing to that board's hesitance, said he would vote against recommending the article if only to reinforce that town officials sitll had a lot of questions about selling the property.

"It still seems like this is rushed to me," said Costley, who's hoping it will prompt discussion at town meeting. "I'm not convinced a sale is the right way to go."

The article was recommended 3-1, with Costley voting no.

Also in the warrant:

Transfer of $114,267 in state circuit breaker funds back to the elementary school.

Various sums to raise and appropriate, including $6,126,738 for the general budget (up 1.6 percent); $940,596 for the capital improvement program; $5,261,543 for the elementary school; $254,933 for McCann Technical School (down 8.4 percent) and $4,413,109 for the Mount Greylock Regional School District (up 1.9 percent).

Voters will decide whether to transfer land on Church Street to the School Committee for possible development as a youth center (Rempell, director of the Youth Center, abstained); to pay up to $15,000 for funeral costs for police and firefighters killed in the line of duty; to expand the board of library trustees from five to seven and to add three associate members to the Zoning Board of Appeals; to pass a series of zoning articles creating a downtown business district; and expand Community Preservation Funds for affordable housing in the former St. Raphael's Church ($400,000) for preservation purposes in the Cable Mills project ($167,539), and $892,000 to replace the town's Well No. 1.

Town meeting is scheduled for Tuesday, May 19, at 7 p.m. at Williamstown Elementary School to decide Articles 2 through 34. Article 1, election of officers, will voted on Tuesday, May 12, from 7 a.m. to 8 p.m. also at the elementary school.
If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Williamstown Board Opts to Negotiate with College on Water St. Lot

By Stephen DravisiBerkshires Staff

Newly elected board member Nate Budington, far left, participates in his first in-person meeting along with, from left, Matt Neely, Stephanie Boyd, Peter Beck, Shana Dixon and Town Manager Robert Menicocci.
WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass. — The Select Board on Monday decided to enter into negotiations with Williams College on the sale of the vacant town-owned lot at 59 Water St.
 
But the board members made it clear that the college's proposal to acquire the lot is a starting point, not a final deal that the elected officials would accept.
 
"For the sake of continued conversation, I'm in favor of [awarding Williams the site], but if this process wasn't continued with the opportunity for further negotiation, I wouldn't vote to continue this," Peter Beck said. "I think that next step is necessary for us to get to a yes on this."
 
"I think there's wide agreement on that," Matthew Neely said just before the 5-0 vote to enter talks with the college.
 
Williams was the sole respondent to a town-issued request for proposals to develop the former town garage site, currently a dirt lot.
 
The college's stated intent is to build a new Facilities office and create up to 170 parking spaces at 59 Water Street. That use will allow the college to redevelop the current Facilities building site and parking lot as part of a reconception of the school's indoor athletic and recreation facilities.
 
Under the terms of the RFP, the college's proposal was subjected to review by an ad hoc advisory committee to the town manager, who brought the question to the Select Board. That board will have the final say on any purchase and sales agreement.
 
View Full Story

More Williamstown Stories