Election 2009: Lamarre Details Stance as Councilor

Print Story | Email Story
NORTH ADAMS, Mass. — I am David Lamarre, a candidate for North Adams City Council. I'd like to share some thoughts on how I see the City Council's role and provide some insight into how I'll approach my responsibilities as a councilor.

Remembering that the strength of a community is found in its citizens, not its government, I believe that the City Council should serve to keep the wires of government and the people tightly connected. As a city councilor, I will work in collaboration with the mayor, councilors, community groups, businesses and individual citizens on urgent issues, routine council business and community initiatives.

These four steps — thinking independently, listening attentively, debating respectfully and acting collectively — are my framework for navigating the sometimes choppy waters of local government. I will make them the hallmark of my service to North Adams.

City councilors have a responsibility to think independently and avoid influences that may shortchange the process or ensure a predetermined outcome. Thinking independently requires confidence with a balance of creativity, perspective and experience, important elements to building a foundation for collaboration. Each of us bringing our own thoughts to the process of government enables the city council to draw from a deeper well of imagination and expertise. Without independent thinkers we risk missing the opportunities of fresh ideas, creativity is stifled, experience discounted and perspective unbalanced. Independent thinkers inspire spirited debate, challenging the status quo. 

We should listen attentively to a variety of points of view and adjust our own thinking to incorporate ideas that will help us achieve the best results. I've often found that when I talk less and listen more I get greater satisfaction from the results of a collective effort. Having given others the opportunity to be heard helps me formulate a more informed opinion and channels my decision making process in a positive way.

That doesn't mean that I'm shy about speaking up. It means that the better I listen the more thoughtful, concise, and meaningful my position is when I do speak. You can't begin a discussion by shutting out opposing points of view and hope to move toward a fully informed decision.

Public debate is the filter that clarifies issues and validates actions. A councilor should debate respectfully while pushing others to present thoughtful positions. Debating respectfully requires setting aside egos and political gamesmanship in favor of reaching the best outcomes. There is nothing like a good and fair argument to affect a positive conclusion. In the end everyone feels like they were a part of the process, their opinions were valued and they're gratified from the effort.

For my part, I'll argue for my positions and can hold tightly to a conclusion. I'm not afraid to be the odd man out or the dissenting opinion on a hot -button issue because compromising principles, values or ethics is a bitter option. The important thing is that government representatives and the people of North Adams trust the process and look ahead optimistically, assured that we're all doing our best to govern in a way that delivers maximum benefit for our city.

To act collectively, as civic leaders, is the last step. Acting collectively means that leadership doesn't end with the council vote. This is where the hard work truly begins. Acting collectively to advance our mutual interests becomes the responsibility of all councilors, no matter where we stood on the issue at the outset. To do otherwise forces a return to the status quo, is not respectful of the process and undermines our progress. Follow through to implementation and conclusion is essential, otherwise we risk that all the thinking, listening and debating has been for nothing.

Thank you for considering my point of view. Cast a vote for civic pride by casting a vote for me, David Lamarre, on Tuesday, Nov. 3.
If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Q&A with State Representative Challenger Andrew Fitch

By Stephen DravisiBerkshires Staff
NORTH ADAMS, Mass. — On Sept. 1, voters in the First Berkshire District will decide whether they want to send a new representative to Beacon Hill in Boston.
 
Andrew Fitch, currently a city councilor in the district's largest municipality — and the commonwealth's smallest city — is challenging former North Adams Mayor John Barrett III, who won the First Berkshire seat in a 2017 special election, in the Democratic Party primary.
 
There is no Republican on the primary ballot for the First Berkshire seat so the primary will effectively be the election for the seat. 
 
The two candidates met for their only debate on Aug. 13 at Williams College. iBerkshires.com reached out to both candidates to follow up on some of the points raised in the debate and get their thoughts on some other issues facing the district.
 
Below are excerpts from a conversation with challenger Andrew Fitch:
 
Question: From the very beginning, you talked about the campaign as a listening experience, and this week you're continuing that with the bike tour …
 
Andrew Fitch: Knocking on doors that have never been knocked on before. … I was riding through, I believe it was Hinsdale coming into Windsor, and they started to yell at me, 'No!' And then the guy was like, 'Wait a second. That's Andrew Fitch.' They actually knew who I was, and they were actually wanting to chat with me.
View Full Story

More North Adams Stories