image description
A map of the proposed Greylock Glen trail system and development.

Greylock Glen Trails Ready for MEPA

By Christopher MarcisziBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

Photos by Christopher Marcisz
Community Development Director Donna Cesan explains a point during the Glen Advisory Committee meeting Thursday.
ADAMS, Mass. — The $2.7 million trail system for the proposed Greylock Glen project is set to begin its state environmental review at the end of the month, and project designers predict that work could begin next spring, marking the launch of the project after decades of failed proposals and frustration.

The news came as the Advisory Committee for the proposed Greylock Glen Outdoor Recreation and Environmental Education Center Project met Thursday afternoon at Town Hall. They discussed the final preparations for submitting the first stages of the Glen proposal to the state for environmental review. That would precede the more elaborate development which includes a campground and lodge and conference center.

Cathy Garnett of the Department of Conservation and Recreation and a member of the committee explained that the filing, an Environmental Notification Form, will be submitted to the state in accordance with the Massachusetts Environmental Policy Act on March 31.

She said the form will reflect the years of research and discussion that has gone on in the past two years.

"We really want this to reflect that," she said. "Everyone will have as much information as we have. We want to be as transparent as possible."

After that, in the middle of April, the state will hold a "scoping session" in Adams on the proposal. The comment period will continue for 21 days after that, and then a decision is expected 10 days after that.

For the meeting, Harold Dodson of Dodson Associates, the landscape architect for the trail portion of the project, presented a report he described as "75 percent" complete on the work. It included details on the way trails would be built, including the critical data about the 90 water crossings and wetlands that are proposed.

"It seems like a lot of work, but each is a wetland crossing and, by law, you have to provide details," he said.

Altogether, the plan encompasses 32 miles of trails, which will affect 19.5 acres out of the roughly 1,063 acres at the Glen.

Dodson said the preliminary cost estimate for the basic trail work comes to about $2.7 million. The total cost including more advanced signage and a snowmaking system would bring the cost to about $5 million.

He said some of the work could be done by groups with experience in trailwork, including the Student Conservation Association or the Appalachian Mountain Club. Bidding could begin later this year.


"Realistically, we would be looking at a year from now [to begin work]," Dodson said.

About a dozen people attended the afternoon meeting, and raised questions about funding for the project. For the early stages, funding comes from the town and matching grants from the state.

Adams Community Development Director Donna Cesan said the MEPA process will help define the rest of the project, but that development partners for later phases of the project will be responsible for much of that work.

"It's designed to be economically sustainable," she said. "It's not expected to be a drain or have any impact except a positive one on the town's taxpayers."

When the MEPA process is complete, the project would go through the local permitting process, including the town Conservation Commission and the Planning Board. Then work could begin on the final phases for the campground and conference center. The design work for that phase, being done by Vanasse Hangen Brustlin Inc., has narrowed the development area to 28.5 acres of the total 1,063 acres at the Greylock Glen.

"The most important thing is to get through the MEPA process," Committee member  George Haddad said. "It's been slow, but it's getting there the right way."

Cesan also said the Committee should consider setting up a Web site on the project, which she said could both keep the public informed on the project's progress and help market the project to potential bidders.

Related Stories:
Greylock Glen Ski Trails Must Pass MEPA Muster
ADAMS - 03-20-2009 - "How they calculate disturbance will have a dramatic affect on the trail system." — Cathy Garnett
Green Living Guidelines Reviewed for Greylock Glen
ADAMS - 05-14-2009 - "It's almost like a cookbook." — Steven Derdiarian
Public Forum Planned for Greylock Glen Trail Proposal
ADAMS - 06-12-2009 - "We are trying to get the best system for the best amount of money." — Harry Dodson
Greylock Glen Plan Gets Round of Applause
ADAMS - 07-24-2009 - "This is your proposal — we're not here to sell you anything tonight." — Leo Roy
If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Letter: Progress Means Moving on Paper Mill Cleanup

Letter to the Editor

To the Editor:

Our town is facing a clear choice: move a long-abandoned industrial site toward cleanup and productive use or allow it to remain a deteriorating symbol of inaction.

The Community Development team has applied for a $4 million EPA grant to remediate the former Curtis Mill property, a site that has sat idle for more than two decades. The purpose of this funding is straightforward: address environmental concerns and prepare the property for safe commercial redevelopment that can contribute to our tax base and economic vitality.

Yet opposition has emerged based on arguments that miss the point of what this project is designed to do. We are hearing that basement vats should be preserved, that demolition might create dust, and that the plan is somehow "unimaginative" because it prioritizes cleanup and feasibility over wishful reuse of a contaminated, aging structure.

These objections ignore both the environmental realities of the site and the strict federal requirements tied to this grant funding. Given the condition of most of the site's existing buildings, our engineering firm determined it was not cost-effective to renovate. Without cleanup, no private interest will risk investment in this site now or in the future.

This is not a blank check renovation project. It is an environmental remediation effort governed by safety standards, engineering assessments, and financial constraints. Adding speculative preservation ideas or delaying action risks derailing the very funding that makes cleanup possible in the first place. Without this grant, the likely outcome is not a charming restoration, it is continued vacancy, ongoing deterioration, and zero economic benefit.

For more than 20 years, the property has remained unused. Now, when real funding is within reach to finally address the problem, we should be rallying behind a practical path forward not creating obstacles based on narrow or unrealistic preferences.

I encourage residents to review the proposal materials and understand what is truly at stake. The Adams Board of Selectmen and Community Development staff have done the hard work to put our town in position for this opportunity. That effort deserves support.

Progress sometimes requires letting go of what a building used to be so that the community can gain what it needs to become.

View Full Story

More Adams Stories