Jobs Top List Of Reasons Young People Leave the Berkshires

By Andy McKeeveriBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story
Young adults are heading out of the county for lack of job opportunities.
PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The reason why so many young people leave the county is no surprise. Jobs.
 
According to a survey of nearly 3,000 young adults who have either left the county or currently live in the county shows that the No. 1 reason the young have left or consider leaving is a lack of quality jobs.
 
The survey showed young adults like the area — with 74 percent calling it a desirable place to live — but they move because of higher-paying jobs elsewhere.
 
"None of this is really surprising to us but it reinforces what we've heard over the years," said Berkshire Regional Planning Commission Planner Mark Maloy, who conducted the survey. 
 
Topping the list at 63 percent for reasons young people leave is jobs followed by 55 percent for a lack of things to do; 54 percent said the work they want to do isn't available, and 40 percent said there was a lack of nightlife. Of those who have left, 67 percent said it was because the work they want to do isn't available, 49 percent found better paying jobs elsewhere, and 41 percent said it was for lack of things to do.
 
"Seventy-four percent of respondents consider the Berkshires a desirable place to live. We consider that good news. They want to live here," Maloy said.
 
In fact those who have left said they would return. Of those who left, 86 percent of respondents enjoyed living in the Berkshires, 72 percent miss the county, and 58 percent would return if their current job and salary was available. The top reasons for returning is family (76 percent), natural scenery (73 percent) and outdoor recreation.
 
Bleakly, only 40 percent actually think they will some day return.
 
The 26-page report is the first step officials have made in tackling the county's decline in population. The forecast shows some 12,420 people leaving over the next 15 years. The trend continues outward and would leave the Berkshires with only 80,695 people in 2060, including a 28 percent drop in school-aged children.
 
"We have a big gap in the young, working adults," BRPC Executive Director Nathaniel Karns said. "It is pretty dramatic to see what our age structure is ... the situation will only get worse for the next 30 to 40 years."
 
Such a population drop could wreak havoc in the county's economy, particularly with home values. But as it stands now, quality housing that is affordable to young professionals is one of the biggest needs. 
 
Maloy says the housing stock is filled with aging buildings and very nice houses in areas too expensive for young people. The right-priced homes are located in bad neighborhoods or need expensive repairs.
 
"We're not talking subsidized housing but affordable to the average working person," Maloy said.
 
Karns added, "you can afford to buy a house in some parts of the community and in others it is very difficult."
 
The survey also showed some contrasting opinions among natives and non-natives, those who never left and those who left and returned. Maloy said natives who moved away and then returned reported enjoying the area at a much higher rate than those who never left.
 
Natives who never left tend to cite crime, drug use, and a "general depressed nature of the area" while non-natives and those who left and returned reported those issues significantly less.
 
Forty-three percent of those who returned planned to stay; only 28 percent planned to relocate again.
 
Maloy says some of those results show a "grass is always greener" concept in that those who have never left have a more negative view of the county and have a higher desire to leave. 
 
Education plays a role in that, too.
 
"Those with less education have a higher percentage of wanting to leave. But fewer actually leave as compared to those with more education," Maloy said.
 
The more education a respondent had, the more he or she enjoyed the region, the survey showed. Agewise, enjoyment of the area grows once a young adult hits his or her 30s. Those more likely to leave are 25 years old or younger and those more likely to stay are in their 30s. 
 
The survey is eyed to help officials narrow their focus as various groups target ways to halt or reverse the population trend. Maloy says the focus should be on economic opportunities for all education levels, improving educational offerings (many left for graduate college programs), increasing affordability of quality housing, revitalizing downtowns, developing more activities and marketing better the recreational opportunities, and investing in transportation methods such as bike paths. 
 
BRPC also released the results of an age-friendly survey on Thursday. iBerkshires will be reporting on those results in the coming days. 
 
Below is the report of the young adult study.
 

Young Adult Survey Results


Tags: demographics,   employment,   jobs,   population,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Lanesborough Officials Take Road District Dissolution Off Warrant

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

LANESBOROUGH, Mass. — The Select Board has removed a town meeting warrant article regarding the dissolution of the Baker Hill Road District.

JMJ Holdings development consultant Tim Grogan spoke in public comment saying the Berkshire Mall owner is currently has purchase-and-sale agreement for the mall. 

Back in February, the Select Board settled a tax dispute with JMJ Holdings by agreeing to move forward in dissolving the district if the company paid $1.1 million to the town. JMJ Holdings had to provide a signed development-and-purchase agreement 30 days before the town meeting. 

JMJ holdings did not submit a payment to be made by May 9. Because of that, the Select Board voted to take the article of the warrant to be voted at the annual town meeting.

Meanwhile, the Baker Hill Road District presented a slideshow defending the district and explaining what it does.

The district currently provides a non-resident-funded revenue stream of around $500,000 per year. These funds help pay for police cars and officer salaries, dump trucks, fire trucks, and more for the town.

"Dissolution would mean the district's three commercial property owners would no longer have to pay for upkeep of the Route Seven/Eight connector road. As a result, the BHRD annual contribution of more than $500,000 to Lanesborough would disappear permanently, since the services and maintenance costs associated with the Route Seven and Eight connector road would still remain," said Tom Caraccioli, PR consultant with AH&M Inc. "Lanesborough would have to absorb these costs and continue to provide emergency services to the mall and Target. The financial burden for these remaining expenses would then fall on Lanesborough taxpayers through higher taxes or the reduction of other important town services."

The proposal with JMJ would affect the town in a negative way Caraccioli claimed. 

"JMJ is proposing a one-time payment of $1.1 million to Lanesborough in exchange, JMJ would never pay BHRD taxes again. The decision to dissolve the BHRD by accepting this proposed $1.1 million would be a permanent choice that would have irreversible consequences," he said. "There will be no official system in place to cover recurring costs once the money from this single payment is spent. Therefore, the proposed one-time payment is not a long-term solution for the town of Lanesborough."

JMJ's dispute was that the Berkshire Mall no longer exists as a functioning entity and it should not be on the hook for protection and maintenance that had been based on the mall's operation in its heyday. The company is seeking to redevelop the site as senior housing and town officials were asking the state to take over the Connector Road. 

District officials said it's not guaranteed that the state would take over the road linking Routes 7 and 8, built to service the mall back in the '80s, and that the state Department of Transportation had historically discouraged the town from asking. Even if it happened, it could take three to five years, during which no BHRD funds would be collected if the district is dissolved. The state would not replace the revenue they support, and they argued the state is facing its own budget issues making it unlikely they would want to take over.

The road district was created by an act of the Legislature and would require another act to dissolve it. The town meeting article asked for voter support for a home-rule petition to start that process.  

After the presentation, it was asked what the current financial status of the BHRD, given that JMJ hasn’t paid in a long time and if the district actually has the money or if it is dependent on the mall sale.

Mark Siegars, attorney for BHRD, reminded the room that the mall is under a purchase and sale agreement and if the sale closes, the district expects to receive more than a million dollars because of the lawsuit and lien, but does not have that cash yet. If the sale does not go through, BHRD will take the mall and sell it. The district still gets payments from Target, which is separate from the mall. 

There were also some questions on the district's history, with Select Board member Jason Breault asking if the mall did not have a high tax rate from the district, would it still be solvent. The exchange became heated between Siegars and BHRD Chair Bill Prendergast.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories