image description
Signs at the end of Alma Street. The city put in a jersey barrier to keep construction trucks from using the street. A road was put in from South Street to service the tower.

Pittsfield ZBA Takes No Action On Cell Tower Petition

By Jack GuerinoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

The 115-foot tower is sited near a city water tank.
PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Zoning Board of Appeals took no action on a City Council petition to re-permit the 877 South St. cellular tower.
 
The ZBA voted Wednesday to adhere to City Solicitor Stephen Pagnotta's opinion that legally the board cannot re-open the special permit.
 
"After a decision has been finalized, to review the hearing or rescind the hearing is not allowable under the statute," Pagnotta said. "The purpose of that is to ensure that permits, and any rights that come under those permits, are final and the applicants can rely on them."
 
The petition was in response to the essentially complete cell tower that abutters say was put up illegally without proper notice.
 
Verizon received the permitting from the Zoning Board of Appeals in 2017 to erect the 115-foot cellular tower. Work began this spring at the end of Alma Street, a narrow dead-end road, catching the residents by surprise.
 
Neighbors claim that they were never properly notified and only became aware of the construction once construction vehicles started rolling through their neighborhood. The location is given as South Street but the tower sits on the far southeastern corner of the 45-acre property abutting a residential area.
 
This group brought the case to Berkshire Superior Court in August and hoped for an injunction forcing Verizon to halt the construction. The antennas reportedly went live in early August.
 
Pagnotta said if the court finds a defect in the granting of the permit it would be remanded back to the ZBA  
 
"We are not there now," he said. "Regardless of the merit or what the board may wish to do it is simply not authorized by the statute."
 
The City Council referred this petition to the board and the mayor knowing that this would likely be the response, but Ward 4 Councilor Christopher Connell was on the line during the Zoom meeting and asked that the board be aware of possible future cases.
 
"We both realize that this certainly can not be overturned but our hopes are ... really that going forward that a situation like this does not happen again," he said.
 
Connell did mention two petitions the City Council has sponsored that he hopes will reinforce this by creating a 1,600-foot setback from residential structures, and notification to all abutters within 1,600 feet of a proposed tower through certified mail.
 
These possible zoning changes were sent to Ordinance and Rules.
 
Board member John Fitzgerald said they had received more than 30 emails on the matter from abutters and concerned residents. Although some were on the call, Fitzgerald did not allow comment because it was not open hearing. 
 
In other business, the board approved a group of requests to keep chickens. These requests took up the bulk of the meeting as Fitzgerald had to read a long list of regulations and responsibilities that come with approval.
 
ZBA member Erin Sullivan asked that the city try to inform livestock sellers that there are regulations in regard to chickens. She noted that many purchase chickens without knowing they needed permission from the city. 
 
"Just to be proactive with this," she said. "We are dealing with it all the time."

Tags: ZBA,   cell tower,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Pittsfield School Committee OKs $82M Budget, $1.5M Cuts

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The school budget is less grim than the original proposal but still requires more than $1.5 million in cuts.

On Thursday, the School Committee approved an $82.8 million spending plan for fiscal year 2025, including a city appropriation of $80.4 million and $2.4 million in Chapter 70 funds.

The cuts made to balance the budget include about 50 staff reductions — some due to the sunsetting of federal Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief funds.

"The final version does not answer all needs. It will be unacceptable to some or to many but I must say that tonight's final proposal is very different than where we started when we believed we would have a $3,600,000 reduction. I want to assure everyone that every effort has been made to minimize the impact on both students, families, and staff members while also ensuring that our district has the necessary resources to progress forward," Superintendent Joseph Curtis said.

"Nevertheless, there are incredibly passionate, dedicated staff members who will not be with us next year. This pains me as I've been a part of this organization for now 30 years so I want to assure everyone that our team, this has weighed very heavily in our hearts, this entire process. This is not a group of people that is looking at a spreadsheet saying ‘Well that can go and this can go’ and take that lightly."

Assistant Superintendent for Business and Finance Kristen Behnke and other officials worked with the state Department of Secondary and Elementary Education to rectify an error in the Chapter 70 funding formula, recognized 11 more low-income students in the district, and added an additional $2.4 million to the FY25 budget.

Curtis commented that when he first saw the governor’s FY25 budget, he was "rather stunned."

"The extraordinary circumstances we face this budget season by the conclusion of the substantial ESSER federal grant and a significant reduction in Chapter 70 allotment caused challenges for this team and our school principals and our educators and our staff that have been nothing short of all-consuming," he said.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories