image description
The torrential water from storms in 2018 collapsed the culvert at Davis and Lime Street.

Adams Con Comm OKs Culvert, Continues Cumberland Farms

By Gregory FournieriBerkshires Correspondent
Print Story | Email Story
ADAMS, Mass. — The Conservation Commission agreed to continue approval last week for culvert repairs on Lime Street.
 
The town had filed a continuance notice of intent requesting information on whether the demolition and removal of the damaged culvert pipe near the intersection of Davis Street and Lime Street is subject to the Wetlands Protection Act.
 
This project dates back to storms that occurred in September 2018, causing an estimated $1 million in damage, as well as Tropical Storm Irene in 2011. Commissioner David Lipinski pushed for approval, saying, "they've been waiting for three years down there" to start the project.
 
Commissioner Thomas Robinson produced a letter from the Berkshire Environmental Action Team (BEAT) expressing concern about the project. Ultimately, however, Robinson and the other commission members rejected the letter because representatives did not attend the publicly available meeting.
 
The commission approved the request.
 
The commission then discussed the planned Cumberland Farms project. Located at 5 Elm St. and 89 & 95 Commercial St., the proposed convenience store and gas station poses a potential hazard if there are oil or gas spills.
 
Robinson, noted that the proposed drainage system for the project leads to the Hoosic River. 
 
"I don't think it makes sense to send that water directly into the river," Robinson said. A fuel spill "might never happen, but if it does, we have real, real problems."
 
Lipinski pushed back on this hesitance, questioning the likelihood of a gas spillage ever occurring. He also said, "I'll bet you that every gas station on the planet has the same situation if there's a spill." 
 
He expressed confidence in Cumberland Farms' ability to manage such a spill if it ever were to occur.
 
The commissioners ended up tabling the issue. They will address it again at their next meeting in two weeks. 
 
The commission in March had heard a presentation on the convenience store's plans to for landscaping, water runoff and remediation of some 3,000 tons of contaminated soil at the site at an estimated cost of $200,000. Hill Engineering has been contracted by the town to do a peer review to determine the plans comply with the Wetlands Protection Act and state's stormwater management requirements.
 
The commission had first heard a request for determination filed by Pan Am Railways, Inc. The railway requested verification of sensitive areas along the wetland boundaries of the Adams branch rail line as they related to the Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act.
 
Pan Am Railways consultant Keith Morris said the request for determination is a routine measure that occurs every five years, in which the railway must renew the no-spray zones along the rights of ways.
 
Morris, who has been consulting for the railway for 20 to 25 years, was confident that he knows where the sensitive areas were. After a brief discussion, the commission approved the request.
 
The next meeting of the Conservation Commission will be in two weeks, on May 13.

Tags: conservation commission,   culvert,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Complaint Withdrawn Over Adams Park Street Christmas Display

By Sabrina DammsiBerkshires Staff
ADAMS, Mass. — The Christmas display at Dr. Martin Bush's dentist office no longer has a violation against it after a complaint was withdrawn. 
 
On Jan. 15, Bush received a correction order from David Rhinemiller, the code enforcement officer, after he received a phone complaint of sound emanating from the front of the building from the end of November until early January. 
 
The sound likely refers to the music coming from Bush's longstanding "Polar Express" display in the window of his office, located at 9 Park St.
 
The violations cited were "holiday decorations with sound that generates a high [sound level] that [is] 10 decimals above normal surrounding noise at the property line.” 
 
In addition, "noise interfering with the normal operation or occupant's health of adjacent or abutting properties or atmosphere."
 
The display is not against local sound ordinances because from 8 a.m. to 10 p.m. the town does not have sound restrictions, Rhinemiller said. 
 
The violation was unrelated to decibel readings because no measurement could be taken — the complaint was received on Jan. 2, after the noise had already stopped.
 
View Full Story

More Adams Stories