Dalton Residents Raise Concerns, Benefits About ADU Bylaw

By Sabrina DammsiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story
DALTON, Mass. — Town residents and officials last week expressed concerns about parts of a proposed accessory dwelling unit bylaw.
 
There was a sense, however, at Wednesday's public hearing that such a bylaw, correctly implemented, could benefit the community. 
 
Select Board member John Boyle said there are many aspects that should be taken into account  before the bylaw is passed. One concern is that it could change the tranquil environment that Dalton residents enjoy.
 
"I think it's a fine idea, but it definitely needs fine tuning," Boyle said. "And as elected officials we're honor bound, duty bound to look at protecting the other residents in town that aren't going to be affected directly by this but could be affected indirectly by having a unit placed in essentially their backyard. And people in his town they value their quietness, value their peace, they value their tranquility and this issue."
 
The Accessory Dwelling Unit committee, which developed the bylaw, explained how an implementation of the bylaw would be good for the community because it increases property value.
 
Committee member Jared Mongeon said, "If you're attempting to sell your home and you're not really receiving many offers, it could be worth building an ADU on your property. Adding one of these can bring a much different buyer to your table or maybe willing to offer you a much higher price point that they will be able to offset their mortgage payment and income generated by renting the ADU."
 
One of the concerns that many participants expressed is the 5-foot setback and conflicts that may occur between neighbors surrounding it. 
 
Agnes Witkowski, the town's health agent, said neighbors could have a problem with being so close. 
 
"That's my concern, and then we could have an increase in housing nuisance with that," she said, adding, however, that  "I could see the need for the ADU in the town, as people age."
 
Witkowski said there is a need for these units for elderly individuals who wish to keep their independence after moving in with family members. 
 
Kelly Pizzi, the director of the Council of Aging, said, "I also wanted to point out that the ADUs are not cheap to build them, you know, they they have to follow local codes. And it's up to the towns to come up with those codes in the zoning, and stuff, which includes the height of the building, the size of the building, the location, on the property, energy efficiency, the design, so it fits in the communities.
 
"It's really important for elders to be able to stay independent in their communities, they don't want to move in with their children. They want to have their own space. And so I don't think you know, everybody's going to be throwing up an ADU because it's not cheap."
 
Wendy Brown, an architect, also had concerns with the 5-foot setback and raised other considerations before implementation.
 
"The other one [concern] was possibly not allowing building detached in floodplain areas. And then also, right now an accessory building is limited to 625 square feet," she said.
 
Participants did mention the bylaw would help conform to Dalton's changing family sizes. 
 
"People who bought homes or were born in the town or Dalton have grown up, raised their families and now that they want to downsize, there's no place for them to go," Pizzi said. "So they're winding up having to go to Pittsfield, Lenox and other areas that offer housing that's not like a large house."
 
Other communities in the surrounding area have implemented similar bylaws to help with the public's need for it, according to the ADU committee's presentation. 
 
"Local communities, Great Barrington, Easthampton, Greenfield, and Plainfield have already touched on the movement," Mongeon said. 
 
Andrew Perenick, the chair of the Planning Board, affirmed how crucial the participants' comments are to the finalization of the bylaw. 
 
"We're going to have the Planning Board discuss any of your comments, just to make sure we have them clear. We just want to make sure everybody feels that their point or question has been heard this evening," Perenick said. "Tonight's public comments will be taken into consideration when drafting the final text of the proposed bylaw"
 
The comments placed during the public hearing will be taken into consideration when composing the final draft of the bylaw.

 


Tags: accessory dwelling,   bylaws,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Lanesborough Looks to Dissolve Baker Hill Road District

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

LANESBOROUGH, Mass. — The Select Board is looking to move forward with dissolving the Baker Hill Road District, which is hindering the Berkshire Mall sale.

On Friday, the Select Board heard from Vice Chair Juli Baker and Chair Deborah Maynard on how Tuesday negotiations went with Cypress Equities, JMJ Holdings, town counsel, the town administrator, and state Rep. John Barrett III. 

Baker said that during Tuesday's meeting, everyone agreed the goal was to have a successful sale of the mall for redevelopment as it’s in the best interest of the town.

Baker said Barrett assured them the state is willing to take the Connector Road and that the state is willing to provide grants to the town to renovate the water and sewer infrastructure, with an estimated total of $4.5 million, to facilitate the property's redevelopment.

"We have received assurances from Representative Barrett that the Commonwealth will provide the monies and will take the Connector," Baker said.

While buyer Cypress Equities saw some benefit in keeping the district, it now doesn't since the state is willing to provide the funds and renovate the infrastructure, according to Baker. 

Baker said that in the meeting, Cypress Equities prefers to enter into a tax increment financing (TIF) and will add to the agreement an amount of funding for public safety services, which would have come from the district. She said Cypress said it would rather enter into one agreement with the town than two agreements with the town and the district.

Mall owner JMJ Holdings is willing to pay $350,000 to the town upon closing, Baker said. 

The meeting Friday was to consider moving forward with a dissolution of the district.

"But the decision that it hinges on tonight is whether to move forward to the dissolution of the Baker Hill Road District in some manner," she said.

Baker said she has worked long and hard to see if there was another alternative to this, working closely with the district which has been "very cooperative and very helpful" in making changes.

The district had agreed to make changes to its governance and taxation; agreeing to have a cap for Cypress as well as agreeing to work to have the state take over the road, sending letters of support.

"What changed this for me is that I've always said it's important to have the special district because we get the public safety funding, and it's also important for the economic district to bring the features that an economic district brings because of what we're up against with the infrastructure problems, and the change at this point is that we have a buyer who is willing to supply that public safety money and commit to it over time, along with the TIF that the town would do, which is essential," she said.

"At this point, I feel like it's in the best interest of the town and protects the town the best in terms of a future where we can develop a mall and bring that economic benefit in. You definitely need to reduce taxes, and you cannot do that without a fully developed retail operation right there. So it's been, you know, deeply difficult decision making," Baker said.

Board members Jason Breault and Jeffery Walters agreed it was the best decision to move forward.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories