image description
Renderings of a possible Starbucks building with different color schemes. The coffeeshop is proposed to be located on the site of a closed gas station near Guido's on Route 7.
image description

Starbucks Proposed on Pittsfield-Lenox Road

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The city currently has three Starbucks — all of which are condensed in Berkshire Crossing. That may be about to change.

The Community Development Board on Tuesday unanimously approved a site plan from Jamasan Hotel Management for the construction of a coffee shop and drive-through at 1030 South St., next to Guido's Fresh Marketplace.

Renderings of the proposed building revealed that it is a Starbucks.

The approval came with a couple of concerns that the board wants to communicate with the City Council, which has the final vote. These are about the possibility of vehicular conflict in front of the site and stormwater discharge.

The popular coffee chain has three locations at 555 Hubbard Ave. and Berkshire Crossing. The Hubbard Avenue location has a drive-through, the second is located inside Barnes and Noble, and the third is in Market 32.

Starbucks' competition Dunkin' Donuts has double the presence in Pittsfield with six locations.

The proposed site on Route 7 spreads over two lots and the front lot used to house a gas station.  The applicants intend to build a 2,700-square-foot coffee shop that maintains the existing curb cuts for entry and exit, has a drive-through, and a waiting lane for 21 cars with a bypass lane after the order point.

The applicant proposed stormwater recharge and detention that drains through existing pipes running behind the adjacent Jiffy Lube and into a natural outlet. A traffic analysis was done to make sure it will not affect the flow of vehicles on Route 7.


"It's fairly straightforward. We think it's a great redevelopment opportunity for the site, it's appropriate for this commercial corridor," civil engineer Timothy Power said.

The board's concerns were primarily related to the curb cut — which they felt may be hazardous — and stormwater management.

"This stretch of Route 7 is quite a bit different than even when the gas station was there," member Libby Herland said.

"We didn't have a Hilton Garden Inn, Guido's probably has expanded and is doing a tremendous amount of traffic, Bousquet is revitalized, the whole area is just — there's probably a lot more traffic than there used to be and I'm really concerned about people exiting from here right next to the exit for Guido's and for the Hilton."

Herland was also concerned about an increase in water runoff because the redevelopment would make the site more impermeable. She encouraged the applicant to look at ways to retain all of the stormwater on-site.

Powers assured the board that the plan does not increase the amount of water sent to the street and said that if it is preferred, they can send a little more back to the drain line if it has the capacity to handle it.

The council will have a public hearing on the proposal on Oct. 11 at its regularly scheduled meeting.


Tags: coffeeshop,   Planning Board,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Letter: Board Balance Needed on Dalton Public Safety Advisory Committee

Letter to the Editor

To the Editor:

I share Dave Martindale's concerns about appointing individuals with actual or perceived conflicts of interest to the newly formed Public Safety Facility Advisory Committee leadership. Several committee members either represent departments that would occupy and directly benefit from the proposed facility or have personal connections to those individuals, raising concerns about the committee's ability to impartially balance a best-in-class facility against a cost-conscious solution.

While their perspectives are valuable, the committee would benefit from a more balanced membership that includes independent residents focused on affordability, long-term planning, and the town's broader financial obligations.

I support the town's decision to explore a combined public safety facility. However, the police station needs assessment should be revisited before the town advances a specific plan. The assessment projects a 32 percent increase in total call volume and a 68 percent increase in staffing by 2045. Those projections are unrealistic based on historical call volume, crime statistics trends and the town's financial outlook — particularly when future budget constraints may require staffing reductions.

The town has already invested considerable time and money pursuing a standalone police station after previously rejecting a combined facility. Now that a joint facility is again under consideration, residents deserve a transparent process based on realistic projections and a cost-conscious evaluation of the town's actual needs.

The town manager and Select Board should consider adding neutral community members to the committee and designating the police chief and interim fire chief as non-voting advisers. They should also revise the needs assessment using supportable staffing, call volume, and population assumptions. A public safety facility is a significant long-term investment, and the town should ensure that the final proposal balances public safety needs with fiscal responsibility.

Amy Lennin
Dalton, Mass.

 

 

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories