Pittsfield Police Union Delays Body Camera Pilot

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Police Department's implementation of a body camera pilot program is being held up by concerns from the union.

On Tuesday, the City Council tabled a status update from the department on body-worn cameras, which have been requested by the council and community members since the police killing of Miguel Estrella in March.

In May, the council formally voted to endorse the use of surveillance technology.

"We're delayed at the moment but we've made quite a bit of progress on the program as a whole," Captain Gary Traversa said.  

He reported that progress had been delayed for the prior 10 days due to issues with the police union but could not disclose any further information.

The panel expects an update on the pilot and a cost estimate for the procurement of body cameras in two weeks.  

"The community has waited a long time for this. We've heard cries for this. The fact that there's a delay, I've got to say, I'm disappointed, " Councilor at Large Earl Persip III said.

"I thought we had all of our ducks in a row trying to do anything we can do to speed this back up. I don't want to delay. I think we should table this and have an update in two weeks. I think the community would want an update in two weeks at our next meeting."

The department met with three vendors, Axon, BodyWorn, and WatchGuard, and dropped WatchGuard from consideration due to a lack of responsiveness and other factors.

After issues with the union are settled, the next step is to deploy the cameras into the field for a six to eight-week period. The department is looking at deploying about 90 cameras and is impressed with aspects of both vendors' technology.

A temporary pilot policy was issued earlier this month.



The hope was to have a vendor chosen by the end of the year.

Traversa described it as a "complex process" with an involved piece of technology that has a lot of features and additional capabilities.

"There are a lot of moving parts and we're trying to work through them one step at a time as best we can,' he added.

Mayor Linda Tyer also could not provide any additional details.

"I think that there were some issues raised this week that the union needs to work through and we won't be able to move forward until those are settled," she said. "I can't speak to it in any greater detail than that."

Persip pressed Tyer for a cost estimate to purchase the cameras but she did not have one. So far, there have been no known conversations with the finance department about it.

Traversa said the department has not "taken much of a dive into the procurement process."

Persip prefers that Tyer asks for the money at the next council meeting to prevent any more delays.


Tags: Pittsfield Police,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Pittsfield Considers Repairing East Part Cemetery

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Historical Commission will consider grant opportunities for repairs to East Part Cemetery.

A resident reached out to the city with concerns about degradation in the half-acre burial ground at the top of Williams Street. East Part Cemetery was established in the early 1800s and has about 300 interments. 

“It's a nice old cemetery, and basically, (the resident) had had concerns that the stone wall had taken some damage, the gravestones have taken some damage, and was wondering if there's anything that could be done to repair the gravestones and the wall," City Planner Kevin Rayner told the commission on Monday.

In cooperation with cemetery leadership and residents, the Historical Commission will consider applying for Community Preservation Act funds to support repairs. West Part Cemetery, on the other side of Pittsfield, has previously used CPA funds for revitalization work. 

The 1080 Williams St. property is owned by the city and managed by the Pittsfield Cemetery Commission. Rayner presented photos of broken and overgrown gravestones, parts of the stone wall collapsing, and knocked-over obelisks. 

Some aspects could use general maintenance and restoration, he observed. 

According to the Pittsfield Cemetery and Crematory's website, East Part Cemetery was established around 1808 on land owned by Nathan Webb, who permitted and authorized its use as a public burying ground.  

In 1842, Nathan Webb's son, also named Nathan Webb, deeded the property to the Methodist Episcopal Society of Pittsfield as a public burying ground, and in 1893 the Trustees of the Methodist Episcopal Society transferred their control of the cemetery to the Proprietors of the Pittsfield Cemetery. Their action was confirmed by the Berkshire Probate Court.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories