Letter: Comment to Dravis Article on 2022 Year in Williamstown

Letter to the EditorPrint Story | Email Story

To the Editor:

I just posted the following as a comment to Mr. Dravis' article on 2022 in Williamstown. Many in Williamstown rely on Mr. Dravis' reporting as their primary source of local news. With that influence comes responsibility.

Below are some quotes from Mr. Dravis' article. They are assertions. If Mr. Dravis has facts to support these assertions, I hope he feels responsibility to share them. The context in which the perpetrator(s) act is important. And, most of all, when investigation yields important information, that information should be given as much print as the initial posting. Sometimes investigation reveals that which seems "racist" is better called by a less judgmental term.

Why?

Once there is even a hint of racism, people, particularly those of color, are hurt. They are made to believe they are "other" in our community. Damage is done. The hurt they feel is real. If these incidents are overblown or misrepresented, people have been hurt for no good reason. A climate of uncertainty must not be encouraged.

Is DIRE, our police department, Williams College or any one keeping a factual list of who? what? when? where? And most important of all: what did an objective investigation reveal about the facts of the "racial" incident? Do we call a bias incident "racist" when the perpetrator was a "person of color?" If we have these lists, and we should, make these lists public. There are ways to share the facts without violating privacy rights. If there is a pervasive undercurrent of racism in this town, it is not seen by many and it certainly is not welcome. Let us both hear the narratives and gather facts.

Below are some of the assertions in the cited article and my comments in capital letters following.
"Hateful messages received"; 2022 had plenty of reminders why the town needs to do all the diversity work mentioned earlier."

Spell out "plenty of reminders."

"The most unsettling example came in the spring, when members of the town's Diversity, Inclusion, Race and Equity Advisory Committee received a threatening email."
 
Did we identify the perpetrator? Was this person punished or disciplined or were there "extenuating circumstances?"
 
"Throughout the year, there were reports of students in the town's schools who were harassed on racial grounds. One widely reported incident involved an adult using inappropriate language at the middle-high school."
 
How many incidents? Was there evidence of baiting the adult who used "inappropriate language?" If there was baiting, should this make a difference in the outcome for the adult?
 
"And in the fall, a spate of racially-charged incidents on the Williams College campus caught the attention of the DIRE Committee."
 
How many incidents constitute a "spate?" What was alleged? What were the outcomes?

Instead of pointing fingers, stirring up drama, and causing hurt, can we not work together to see if racism is as prevalent as some people argue. A litany of "lived experiences" is not to be discounted. Nor is a listing of microaggressions. But additional perspective is sorely needed and outcomes need to be shared with the community.

Donna Carlstrom Wied
Williamstown, Mass.

Editor: Year-end reviews are a summary of important events and issues and there are hot links to the original reporting in each case mentioned. 

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Mount Greylock School Committee Moving Superintendent Evaluation to Fall

By Stephen DravisiBerkshires Staff
WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass.—The Mount Greylock Regional School Committee this month discussed moving its evaluation of the superintendent from the spring to the fall starting in 2027.
 
Chair Julia Bowen brought the idea to the table as part of her proposed calendar for the committee's work during the 2026-27 academic year, saying that a move to the autumn will allow the committee to factor data from the preceding year into its evaluation.
 
"To the extent that [Superintendent Joseph Bergeron's] goals are tied to school performance and, specifically, MCAS [scores], we don't get that or other end of school year summative information until the fall," Bowen said. "Many schools I've worked with and know of actually moved their school leader evaluation to the fall so they can take advantage of all the data that's actually available, rather than doing it in the June time frame.
 
"The other point on that is, as it is, we otherwise vote for Joe's goals in September/October and evaluate him in May, and that's not a year. If we can do it fall to fall, we actually get a full year of work from when we agree on the goals."
 
The committee's most experienced member, Carolyn Greene, raised a concern about breaking with the practice of completing the evaluation process in May and June.
 
"It feels natural to evaluate a superintendent at the close of a school year, not the beginning of a school year," Greene said. "We're still in it in May and June. We're still in it in terms of our mindsets. Sometimes we don't meet in July. We come back in August and do a ‘retreat.' We're now meant to hit the ground running with an evaluation in September based on the work of the previous school year. And the reason is we don't get all the data from the previous school year until September.
 
"The rhythm is off for me. But it could just be that I'm so used to the previous rhythm. I don't want to oppose it. I just do have some reservations about it."
 
View Full Story

More Williamstown Stories