Letter: Contrast Between Parties

Letter to the EditorPrint Story | Email Story

To the Editor:

Good government is harder than it looks. Good government, like good political leadership, requires getting things done even when people fundamentally disagree, while keeping those same people on speaking terms. Good government serves all of the people, not just those who voted for it. Good government builds on laws and regulations, on debate and compromise.

Only one of our national political parties cares any more about good government. Democrats argue among themselves about particulars, but not about the goals of social justice and good government. Today's Democrats are heirs of the Roosevelts' Progressive movement — which began when the relevant Roosevelt was the Republican. They want to make the government work for the welfare of all. And not just by spending money: the last time the president submitted a balanced budget to Congress and the federal government ran a surplus, that president was a Democrat.

Good government is effective government. Speaker Nancy Pelosi could get stuff done, notably bringing home Obama's Affordable Care Act, which required working through disagreements in the Democratic caucus. They managed to do it. President Joe Biden is getting stuff done, notably the Inflation Reduction Act, infrastructure, and firearms laws — and, like President Obama, while running a no-scandal administration. There's always room for improvement, of course, but fundamentally Democrats want the government to work.


Today's Republican party does not want the government to work. Instead of passing legislation, congressional Republicans stumble leaderless through messaging stunts and irresponsible controversies about basics like honoring debts and confirming appointments. In an act of abject political cynicism, they won't even take a negotiated bipartisan "yes" for an answer to their own demands about border control.

The Republicans admit they don't want the government to solve the problem because their leader wants to demagogue it. If there is a strategy behind the bumbling chaos, it is to make the government dysfunctional, so their voters will conclude that only The Strong Man can fix it. Many of those supporters reportedly would welcome "Der Furor"  as a dictator, brushing aside mushy distractions like debate and compromise and the parts of the Constitution he finds inconvenient.

In choosing this election year between good government and chaos, we should heed the lesson of the 20th century: Fascism arrived via the ballot box. In 2024, voting for good government means voting for Democrats.

Michael Wise
Great Barrington, Mass. 

The writer is the chair of the Great Barrington Town Democratic Committee and of the Berkshire Democratic Brigades.

 

 

 

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Housatonic Water Works Penalized for Delayed Treatment Facility

GREAT BARRINGTON, Mass. — The state Department of Environmental Protection has issued a $2,500 demand for payment of suspended penalty to Housatonic Water Works Co. for failure to comply with a July 2025 Administrative Consent Order with Penalty. 
 
The order required the company to complete a manganese treatment plant at its drinking water treatment facility by June 1, 2026. 
 
"It is unacceptable that Housatonic Water Works has failed to meet the required deadline for completing and placing the manganese treatment system into operation," said Michael Gorski, director of MassDEP's Western Regional Office in Springfield. "MassDEP expects the company to accelerate construction of the treatment plant and make it operational without further delay." 
 
Under the terms of the 2025 order, the water company agreed to complete the manganese treatment plant by March 1, 2026, to mitigate ongoing seasonal drinking water discoloration affecting the company's service areas. 
 
MassDEP agreed to suspend the full penalty of $12,360 on the condition that it complied with the requirements of the order. The company subsequently requested an extension of the March 1 deadline, citing pending litigation and related delays in acquiring required construction funding. MassDEP extended the completion date to June 1. The company requested an additional extension; MassDEP denied that request. 
 
Housatonic Water Works had failed to complete construction of the treatment plant. Based on that violation of its order, MassDEP demanded partial payment of the suspended penalty in the amount of $2,500. Penalty costs may not be passed along to ratepayers in any way. MassDEP will continue to track this matter closely until compliance is achieved. 
View Full Story

More South Berkshire Stories