WMHT to Hold Listening Session in Pittsfield

Print Story | Email Story
ALBANY, N.Y. — WMHT Public Media announced it has begun the second phase of its Listening Tour, part of a continued effort to better understand the needs and issues affecting communities throughout its coverage area, and to develop and present content and programming to best serve those values and priorities. 
 
Up to a dozen town hall-style discussions will be led by WMHT President and CEO Anthony V. Hayes and members of WMHT's senior leadership team. They are open to residents and viewers, and will be held in public spaces throughout WMHT's coverage area, an expansive region that runs north to the Adirondacks, east to the Berkshires, south to Westchester County, and west to the Schoharie Valley.
 
One of these listening sessions will take place in Pittsfield on May 10 at the Pittsfield Public Library
 
WMHT Public Media is a multichannel public communications organization serving Eastern New York and Western New England,
 
The initial session was held April 10 at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute. Upcoming forums are scheduled for April 30 at SUNY Schenectady County Community College; May 2 at the Albany Public Library; May 8 at SUNY Adirondack in Queensbury; May 10 at the Pittsfield Public Library; May 28 with the NAACP and Albany Black Chamber of Commerce; and June 7 with the Troy City School District. Sessions are also being planned in the Hudson Valley and Saratoga Springs, among other potential locations. 
 
"It is essential to hear directly from our residents and viewers to better understand what's happening in their communities, not only their success stories but also the challenges they face," said Anthony V. Hayes, President and CEO of WMHT Public Media. "As we gain deeper understanding of the needs, values and priorities of each community, WMHT will be well-positioned to develop and produce content and programming that educates, empowers, and enriches the lives of our audience." 
 
Building on initial research conducted last fall, phase two of WMHT's Listening Tour aims to more fully ascertain the unique and shared needs, wants and aspirations of the region's multicultural and multiethnic communities. Additionally, it will look closely at the next generation of public-media consumers. Fueled by that information, WMHT can take action to positively impact the lives of community members, friends, and neighbors throughout its coverage area. 
 
More details about the WMHT Listening Tour, including an updated schedule of events with registration information, can be found at https://www.wmht.org/blogs/press-releases/wmht-continues-community-listening-tour/.
If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

SJC: Public Records Petition 'Proper'

Staff Reports
BOSTON — The Supreme Judicial Court in an advisory opinion released Monday found the petition to bring the Legislature and governor's office under the Public Records Law is "proper" as a form of law.
 
"Its principal purpose is not to regulate the internal proceedings or operations of the two Houses," the court wrote. "Instead, its principal purpose is to provide the public with a new right of access to the records of the General Court and the office of the Governor, applying the existing public records law to those bodies alongside the other governmental bodies already subject to the law. "
 
The state Senate asked the Supreme Judicial Court to weigh in on whether public records petition was a violation of the state constitution. The Legislature is required to act on the matter by May 5; if not, supporters plan to put it on the ballot in November. 
 
Auditor Diana DiZoglio has championed the petition as a measure to bring greater transparency to the workings of state government and as part of her own battle to audit the Legislature. More than 70 percent of voters approved the audit question in November 2024. 
 
The Senate asked the court whether, first, the petition was a law or a rule that would interfere with its internal processes and, second, would it create "new and unprecedented authority" to the courts to determine challenges to records determinations.
 
The court offered "that the petition proposes a law and is therefore properly pending before the Legislature" and, for Question 2, concluded "that the proposed measure does not relate to the powers of courts."
 
The court declined to answer three following questions related to intrusions on Senate authority and General Court authority, and violation of rights of  "deliberation, speech and debate" granted to members and staff.
View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories