Dalton Ambulance Committee Evaluates Vehicle Options

By Sabrina DammsiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story
DALTON, Mass. — The Fire District ambulance committee is evaluating different options and timelines to determine the most feasible way of replacing its ambulances. 
 
The station has two ambulances — a 2016 International and a 2019 Ford 50. In September, it was reported that the International had been out of service for the last month because of brake issues. 
 
The International is back and running; however, the new Ambulance Director Morgan McDonough decided to have it operate as a Basic Life Support ambulance to save money on narcotics and staffing, interim Fire Chief Chris Cachat said during last week's Board of Water Commissioners meeting. 
 
This has been going well, he said. 
 
Cachat said it can be swapped back to Advanced Life Support at a moment's notice. 
 
The Ford 50 is still operating as an Advanced Life Support vehicle. However, during the September meeting, it was reported that a replacement vehicle would be needed in the future because it was not designed to handle the additional load of ALS, leading to accelerated wear and tear. 
 
When the district took over the ambulance service from the association, it only offered Basic Life Support. 
 
Cachat said a committee member has spoken with suppliers, one of whom said there is a waiting list "anywhere from two or three years."
 
"They would also engage in a non-binding, basically agreement that you would be put into a queue for an ambulance. It's almost like a waiting list, but it's a nonbinding. You don't have to put any money down," 
 
"If your department comes up in the queue, then you design and build an ambulance. The downside of that is the three years, and also what your trading values are going to be three years from now." 
 
The other supplier is building a number of different types of ambulance models on spec and the wait for the ambulance would be two years, Cachat said. 

Tags: ambulance service,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Berkshire Concrete Lawsuit Seeks Damages, Continued Operation

By Sabrina DammsiBerkshires Staff
DALTON, Mass. — Whether Berkshire Concrete can continue excavating after its permit was denied —and if the town is liable for damages — will be decided in a lawsuit the company has filed against the town, planning board and its members.
 
The suit was filed on behalf of Berkshire Concrete Corp., a subsidiary of Petricca Industries, by Jaan G. Rannik of Cohen Kinne Valicenti & Cook in Superior Court on April 13
 
Berkshire Concrete is suing for damages and wants the Planning Board's permit denial overturned.
 
The company seeks permission to operate on its entire property, and to have any future permit applications granted — unless they violate previous permit conditions and fail to fix them after formal written notice, or if the Mine Safety and Health Administration finds a public health danger requiring new restrictions.
 
It also requests that if a future renewal is denied for a violation and Berkshire Concrete disputes it or claims it didn't have time to fix, operations can continue until a  final decision is made.
 
The company claims the town breached its 1992 contract with Berkshire Concrete and the board exceeded its authority in denying the special permit. 
 
Berkshire Concrete claims that as a direct result of the town's breach of contract it suffered damages of no less than 1.9 million and will continue to incur additional damages. 
 
View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories