image description
This abandoned Fourth Street multifamily has been subject to break-ins despite being secured. The Board of Health has voted to condemn the structure for demolition.
image description
This four-bedroom single-family home as been vacant since 2018.

Pittsfield BOH Condemns Two Homes

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — Two more Pittsfield homes have been condemned.

The Board of Health voted Wednesday to condemn 86 John St. and 224 Fourth St. It came with a pang of sadness about demolishing homes during a housing crisis and a conversation about prevention.

"I would think many years ago this property had flowers in front of it," Chair Roberta Elliott said about the John Street home. "It was not like this."

Another member said it feels like capital punishment to the properties.

Both homes have no owner or heir who wants to take responsibility for them. The city has 43 open condemnation orders — about 20 residential.

"The condemnation can be as simple as no running water, no electricity," Code Enforcement Office Andrew Gagnon said. "So it is a spectrum of severity."

The four-bedroom John Street property has been sitting since 2018 and the Fourth Street multifamily has been subject to break-ins despite being secured and deemed unsafe by the Fire Department.

"It's unfortunate that so many properties on John Street have had to meet the wrecking ball," Gagnon said.

"But in a case like this, it seems it would be more money to get it back up to code than what it could potentially be worth."

Director of Public Health Andy Cambi reported that the city is attempting to begin a receivership program for vacant buildings. According to Mass General Law Chapter 111, Section 1271, if a receiver is appointed they can bring the property to sanitary code and repair it.


"We want to be able to kind of get in there with our city solicitor and see if we can manage a receivership program, meaning that we have the court appoint a vendor to address an immediate need," he said.

He explained that the city provides potential buyers with a vacant buildings list but, unfortunately, people usually walk away because of their condition.

Board member David Pill asked if the lawns could be maintained after properties are abandoned or condemned, speculating that they might be more appealing to investors if overgrowth was cleared.

"I'll definitely speak on behalf of the board and our department to say that from our interest that it would be ideal to have a schedule for city crews to be able to address supplemental growth on properties that have blight," Cambi said.

"And it might help make it more appealing to investors if there's maintenance on it."

The city has also looked into updating its ordinance to allow cleanup on blighted properties.

Elliott added that a blighted property sitting there for many years doesn't help anyone. She asked what the city was doing about properties teetering on the edge of being condemned.

"I think we've always talked with other departments about the tax taking and being more proactive with that because essentially, that's really the only way that the city can take ownership of it," Cambi said, explaining that the properties become complicated when there are no owners.

Elliott recognized this is a hard job and it is frustrating to see condemnations come through when the housing stock is so limited.  

"It's a very complicated problem," she said. "I hate to be at the point where our only option is to condemn and demolish. It feels like that's the only option we have here."


Tags: blight,   BOH,   demolition,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Pittsfield Company Fined for Asbestos Violations

BOSTON — The Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection has issued a $17,400 penalty to Pittsfield-based Barile Environmental Inc. for asbestos violations that occurred during abatement services at an office building located at 23 Lewis Ave. in Great Barrington.  
 
MassDEP discovered the violations during inspections of the office building in October 2025. Barile failed to follow appropriate asbestos work practices and controls during its asbestos abatement activities at the building site. MassDEP inspections of the facility revealed that Barile personnel were removing asbestos-containing siding in violation of state asbestos regulations.  
 
"MassDEP enforces asbestos regulations so that management of asbestos-containing materials is completed safely," said Michael Gorski, director of MassDEP’s Western Regional Office in Springfield. "This consent order requires payment of a substantial penalty and could have been avoided if the proper work practices were followed." 
 
Following MassDEP's order, Barile has completed the required cleanup actions and must pay $14,000 of the $17,400 penalty to resolve the violations. The balance of the penalty is suspended pending compliance with the remaining administrative terms of the order.  
 
Property owners or contractors with questions about asbestos-containing materials, notification requirements, proper removal, handling, packaging, storage, and disposal procedures, or MassDEP asbestos regulations are encouraged to contact the appropriate MassDEP Regional Office for assistance.  
View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories