image description
The proposal involves rebuilding Conte Community School and Crosby Elementary on the West Street site with shared facilities, addressing outdated infrastructure, insufficient layouts, and significant repair needs.

MSBA Greenlights Pittsfield's Crosby/Conte Proposal

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

PITTSFIELD, Mass.—The Massachusetts School Building Authority (MSBA) has accepted a statement of interest for the proposed Crosby/Conte build.

On Wednesday, Superintendent Joseph Curtis reported that the MSBA met on Friday and accepted the project into its queue.  The proposal involves rebuilding Conte Community School and Crosby Elementary on the West Street site with shared facilities, addressing outdated infrastructure, insufficient layouts, and significant repair needs. 

Curtis said earlier that day, the district participated in module one of the work for possibly a new building on West Street.  Part of that work is a feasibility study.

The Crosby/Conte plan has the potential to house grades pre-kindergarten to first grade in one school and Grades 2 to 4 in another, with both maintaining their own identities and administrations.

"The feasibility study also studies the structure of our district, the enrollment, the viability of grade spans," he said.

"So what I want to do is, if, with your permission, is really dig into that, we just get a couple of documents just today, and then report back to the committee on the level of detail and what is studied in that feasibility study so then we can possibly make a decision, or the committee can, that might alter this timeline even further."

Curtis also corrected a media inaccuracies claiming that grade alignments were already set in stone.  iBerkshires had not yet reported on this.  

"I did want to just correct that there was an inaccuracy in that coverage that stated that I had determined grade span ranges already," he said.

"So that was not covered correctly."

He pointed out that the district has a "rather large" Middle School Restructuring Committee of parents, teachers, and community members.  The panel is working in three groups research grade spans across the Commonwealth, educational programming and educational models, and solicit feedback.

The committee recently decided that it would put a recommendation forward in mid-February if it felt confident doing so.  The recommendation would be followed by public hearings covering grade spans.

The School Committee could then decide if another public hearing is needed or delay the decision timeline.

"And so they would have one more research meeting, which would be on January 6. They would start to formulate some recommendations within their group on the 6th, a little more time for refinement on the 3rd and there'd be shareouts of the groups," Curtis explained.

"And then we would start at that meeting on the 3rd to, if we can, I want to be clear about that, come to some kind of consensus for a recommendation that the committee members yet to be nominated to come to the school committee on February 12."

The group developed for community members, staff, parents and guardians, and students in grades 4-9.


"The committee wanted to stress that this surveying is the digital participation and then at our next meeting, they're establishing focus group questions, which they've already been working on. They're going to identify locations to have those focus groups, which there will be in-person opportunities and via Zoom," Curtis added.

"And so that'll be finalized at the January 6 meeting. Outreach will occur throughout the February 12 deadline, if you will. We capture anecdotal feedback through the focus groups and there's always an exit ticket, if you will, or a survey. So all that will be available for their final decision."

School committee member Sara Hathaway said there is a good range of people, parents, teachers, and even bus drivers represented on the committee.

"We've had good input and opportunities for participation and it feels as if people are sharing freely their concerns about the current situation but also their hopes and their ideas for what we could be," she said.

"It’s a very positive process, I think, ably led by our superintendent putting the right questions before us and giving us the right amount of opportunity to affect the outcomes."

Chair William Cameron said he is most concerned about the educational models in the middle schools.  

"That is, what are we going to do in the middle schools educationally, in terms of programming mode, modes of instruction, course offerings, after-school activities," he asked.

"What are we going to do so that the middle schools become attractive, rather than for justification or otherwise, objects of criticism?"

Curtis reported that there is a group specifically designed for education models, which includes electives, vocational opportunities, and honors opportunities. 

In August, the School Committee approved an ambitious timeline that could see the city's middle school reconfiguration implemented as soon as the 2025-26 academic year.

If all goes according to plan, the committee will decide on grade spans and the educational models for the potentially newly configured schools in February. The administration would work out an implementation plan in March.

A couple of restructuring efforts are running parallel to the Crosby/Conte SOI.

The School Building Needs Commission is overseeing a district restructuring study that addresses the physical and educational needs of Pittsfield Public Schools.  It includes possible consolidations and different grade spans.



 


Tags: MSBA,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

BRTA Focuses on a New Run Schedule

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Berkshire Regional Transit Authority is still working on maintaining its run schedules after dropping the route realignment proposal.

Last Thursday's meeting was Administrator Kathleen Lambert's first official meeting taking over the reins; retiring director Robert Malnati stayed during a transition period that ended last month.

Lambert is trying to create a schedule that will lessen cancellations. There was a two-hour meeting the week before with the drivers union to negotiate run bids and Lambert is working with the new operating company Keolis, which is taking over from Transdev.

The board spoke about anonymous emails from drivers, which Lambert said she has not seen. iBerkshires was not able to see those letters, but has received some. 

"They were lengthy emails from someone describing themselves as concerning BRTA employee, and there was a signed letter from a whole group of employees basically stating their concerns. So, you know, to me, it was a set of whistleblowers, and that, what my understanding is that this really triggers a need for some type of process to review the merits of these whistleblowers, not going to call them accusations, but basically expressions of concern," said member Stephen Bannon.

A letter iBerkshires received spoke of unhappy drivers who were considering quitting because of decisions being made without "input from frontline staff," frustration and falling morale, and the removal of the former general manager shortly after Lambert came in.

Lambert said it's difficult to navigate a new change. She also noted many drivers don't want to do Saturday runs and it has been hard negotiating with drivers on the new runs.

"I would like you all to keep in mind that the process of change is super difficult. Transdev has been here for 20 years, and some of these drivers have never known any other operating company, the way some of the operations have been handled has been archaic," she said. "So getting folks up to speed on how a modern transit system works is going to be painful for them. So I don't want to say that I'm unsympathetic, because I am sympathetic, but I am trying to coax people along with a system that's going to seem very strange to them."

The board spoke about better communication between them and Lambert, citing cooperation will be best moving forward.

"There's just a lot of stuff in the air right now, and there are a lot of fires to put out to make this a coordinated effort. And if we don't keep our communications open and be straightforward, then you get blindsided about how you know the input that you could get from us about your position, and how you know what's going on in your direction, and we get blindsided. And I think that we have to make sure that this is a collaboration," said member Sherry Youngkin.

"Both sides have responsibilities, because in the long run, this advisory board is going to have to make decisions as to how we brought forward and if we've gone forward in a fair and helpful way. And I think that's hopefully what everybody is looking for also." 

Transdev and Keolis held a three-day recruiting event interviewing almost 40 candidates and offering jobs to eight, but only three stayed on to start training. Lambert said it was disappointing but she will keep trying to retain more people.

In her first report to the board, she noted that ridership dipped a little over 10 percent, but still remains higher than last year, adding that was because of cancellations of services because of the lack of drivers.

Like the last meeting, some of the advisory board members were torn over the start of the Link413 service, worried that the start of the service took drivers away and the numbers of riders are low.

Lambert, however, said the ridership has doubled from last month.

"As I've spoken before, we have, generally, a six-month adoption for brand-new service before you can really go in and evaluate, are you being successful based on the grant that my predecessor wrote along with the team for PBTA and RTA, we are ahead of schedule, which is pretty good, so I'm hoping that will continue to improve," she said.

Member Renee Wood said the board never approved the service, adding the only thing she could find in the minutes was a vote to accept the equipment. She said it was supposed to be put on the agenda to discuss.

"The Link413 service has been three years in the making. It's been a grant that was accepted and has been working with our partners, PVTA and FRTA, to put into place. So I don't have the entire history of how that process worked, but it's been three years in the making, and did we not understand that once we accept that grant that we were going to put in new service?" Lambert said.

The board discussed if Title VI, the Civil Rights Act, was followed with an accurate review and accurate amount of time for public comment period on the service changes and if its attorney should review if the  grant conditions were properly followed.

Lambert said changes had the 60-day comment period included in the proposed route realignment packet, giving the opportunity for the community to respond to that as well but will look into the legality of the situation with their attorney.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories