image description
The 'No Turn on Red' at Center and Holden Streets in North Adams is expected to be removed.

North Adams Panel Advises Traffic Sign Removal, Debates Animal Control Ordinance

By Tammy Daniels iBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story
NORTH ADAMS, Mass. — Police officers stuck at Center Street and Holden won't have to flash their lights to get through soon. 
 
Public Safety Committee last week recommended the City Council follow the Traffic Commission's lead to remove the "No Turn on Right" sign next to Public Eat and Drink.
 
"Most of the officers are saying you're stuck at that intersection," interim Chief Mark Bailey told the committee. "If you have an emergency, but it's not really emergency, you're trying to get to somebody, a call, a citizen or something, and you're not required to turn the blue lights on, you're stuck at that intersection light for a long time."
 
The police station was relocated to the Berkshire Plaza in 2023, in what had been the juvenile court. That offered plenty of more space for officers and better access for citizens, but also put the cruisers on one-way Center Street. 
 
Cruisers turning left have to put their lights on to make it through the dense crossing but vehicles turning right have to sit through the long light — even if there is no traffic.  
 
Bailey explained that this change will allow police officers more flexibility when responding to non-emergency calls, reducing wait times at the traffic light and reducing potential traffic congestion when emergency vehicles need to pass through.
 
"If you have other civilians that are stuck at that traffic light waiting for it to turn red to turn right, we have to turn blue lights to move them out of the way in order to get through the intersection, because it's very narrow," he said. "It's not like we can just sneak by."
 
Committee member Peter Breen wondered if motorists headed east on the artery would be confused if they were trying to make a right turn onto to Holden. Chair Bryan Sapienza pointed out there are other "No Turn on Right" signs directly across from the bridge.
 
In fact, there's a forest of "No Turn on Red" signs at the intersections at the foot of the Veterans Memorial Bridge, including three facing Route eastbound.
 
Sapienza asked if officers should just turn on their blue lights but Bailey didn't think it was necessary to disrupt traffic.
 
"If it's an emergency situation, they'll turn the blue lights on," he said. "I'm just saying, if there's a situation where the officer has to go that's not requiring immediate assistance, it's easier for them to get through the intersection turning right." 
 
The committee also began work on an animal control commission ordinance brought forward by Mayor Jennifer Macksey, who had asked ACO Matthew Reynolds to look into procedures around animal control. 
 
The new five-member board would advise the city's animal control officer after hearing cases regarding concerns or complaints on an as-needed basis.
 
It also would be empowered to create educational programs, publish statistics on the city's animals and make recommendations to other bodies about a long-range plan to meet the North Adams' "needs in connection with animal control."
 
Sapienza read from a template that would have the members appointed by the mayor with staggered terms of three years. 
 
Breen said he had looked at ordinances in Pittsfield, Boston and Springfield, which have more extensive and authoritative boards that hold rabies clinics and other preventative actions. 
 
He and Committee member Deanna Morrow discussed if the commission should have members with specific expertise or representation, such as a veterinarian, a city councilor and the ACO, like the larger communities. Some even had a Department of Public Works representative, said Breen, because they often deal with removal of dead animals. 
 
These commissions also often had an animal inspector and Sapienza asked what certifications the North Adams officer had. 
 
"He has all the authority as any animal control officer that we've ever had," said Bailey. "He's taken all the classes. He's certified in it. The one right now that's up for grabs is the animal inspector. That was quasi brought in a few years ago and merged into the animal patrol officer. And I believe the animal inspector for the city is mostly just going out and inspecting a barn."
 
The city only has one barn with animals adn in the case of wild animals, he said, "We get involved with the [state] Environmental Police to come out and take care of that, especially when you get to bears, moose and your larger animals."
 
The ACO can work with a veterinarian to get animals tested and has vouchers to help people get their pets rabies shots. 
 
"It's my authority as the chief to deem your animal a dangerous dog," the chief said. "I can say that based on incidents where your dog bites somebody, let's say, or attack and kill another animal, I can say that your dog is deemed dangerous therefore you have to follow these certain parameters, as outlined in Mass General Law."
 
Bailey didn't it was fair or right for one person to be making those decisions without the opportunity for the owner to appeal. 
 
"I get it that that's that's my job and everything, but there's no hearing authority, no right for you as a citizen to come in and rebuke that," he said. "Also, on the flip side, I can sit here and say, 'I don't think that your dog is dangerous or a nuisance.' Too bad. So sad."
 
The main issue, he said, is to get more people involved, to make decisions on animals within the city.
 
The push for a commission was in part the result of a number of dog nuisance issues last summer that had landed in the chief's lap.
 
"I never heard of any other chiefs or directors dealing with this before, either," he said. "I didn't even think was my authority."
 
A dangerous dog issue had been sent to the Public Safety Committee five years ago to allow for a hearing despite the city's ordinances placing the authority with the police. 
 
https://www.iberkshires.com/story/62634/North-Adams-Owner-Appealing-Dangerous-Dog-Ruling.html
 
Morrow and Breen offered to separately go through the proposed ordinance and return with suggestions; Breen said he would also like to hear from the ACO at the next meeting. 
 

Tags: animal control,   traffic signage,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Letter: Chamberlain: Thank You, North Adams

Letter to the Editor

To the Editor:

Thank you North Adams!

It has been an honor to serve on your School Committee these past years. I am living in Vermont now and so am unable to continue serving, but I wanted to take this opportunity to express my appreciation, as well as my concerns, for the city and the commonwealth.

I have engaged actively in Massachusetts politics for many years, but this was my first experience holding public office, and I could not have hoped for a more inspiring experience. I was privileged to work with many of the most caring, dedicated, and passionate elected officials I have ever met, and I’m eager to see what the city will accomplish in the years ahead as civic participation continues to grow and flourish.

I see so much potential being realized in North Adams, but I remain frustrated by the behavior of governments at higher levels. Most of my concerns have been shared by voices louder and more articulate than mine. But one has not, and it is the source of nearly every failure of government we experience now: that we have allowed two private political machines to take and hold every lever of political power that exists.

While one machine in Washington undermines every principle of republican government our country has ever claimed to hold, the other machine in Boston betrays our democracy in order to separate their power from any check, balance, audit, and every other form of accountability to voters. They offer favors for loyalty, policy outcomes for campaign contributions, and retribution for dissent. And for all the feigned animosity we observe between them, they have colluded successfully to convince nearly every American that they have no choices in their government’s leaders save those ordained by them.

I hope that the years to come will see the esteem enjoyed by these machines continue to dwindle, and that we may eventually reclaim the tools of democracy from them and their corporate sponsors. Until then, we must make a conscious effort to distinguish between the candidates who seek to work for us (despite the political necessity of their affiliation) and those who seek to work for the privileges of party status.

I was tempted to list the names of candidates that I would be supporting if I still lived in Massachusetts, but I suspect they will be obvious to any who have or will consider this year’s elections. Further, I know that the concerns I raise above will take far longer than a single election cycle to remedy.

So thank you for your trust in me these past years, and for your consideration now.

Cody Chamberlain

View Full Story

More North Adams Stories