Federal Grants Withheld from Pittsfield Schools

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — Several hundred thousand dollars in federal grant allocations are being withheld from the Pittsfield Public School District. 

On Wednesday, interim Superintendent Latifah Phillips told the School Committee that the district will know if they are receiving the funds in August or September. For now, school officials are "in a holding pattern" and hoping the Title grants come through. 

"When you all adopted the district budget, we had an expectation of what the federal allocations would be, and we have recently been notified that there are federal grant allocations being withheld," Phillips said. 

Current federal grant allocations being withheld include: Title I-C that supports children of migratory agricultural workers and fishers, Title II-A for systems of support for excellent teaching and leading, Title III-A for English learners, Title IV-A that supports high quality educational experiences for students, and federal funds for the Integrated English language and Civic Education programs and the Adult Education Basic Grants to the States program. 

Phillips said the district doesn't receive Title I-C funds, but does the rest.

Numbers were not given, but according to documentation from the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education, PPS received a total of $4,815,619 in state and federal grants in 2025. Just the Title funding amounts to nearly $500,000. 

In 2025, the district was allocated $238,289 for Title II-A, $31,788 for Title III-A, $145,017 for Title IV-A, and $73,241 for Title III: English Language Acquisition and Academic Achievement Program for English Learners and Immigrant Children and Youth. 

It was also allocated $118,184 for "Strengthening Career and Technical Education for the 21st Century Act (Perkins V) Secondary." 

"Among the cuts that the federal government announced for education, the 21st Century Program is on that chopping block," School Committee member Sara Hathaway said, adding that political pressure prevented cuts in that program. 

"… So we just have to figure out how to use that political pressure." 

The $86.4 million school budget for fiscal year 2026 includes an $18 million city contribution and more than $68 million of anticipated Chapter 70 funding, the major program of state aid to public elementary and secondary schools.

Entitlement grants are secured by the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 and are based on a federal calculation.

The interim superintendent and her team have begun discussing possible implications for the district. 



"We went to assess what are the carryover funds that we have in each of these areas, and based on those carryover funds, if our allocation is not distributed, how will we prioritize what we're currently spending?" she explained. 

"We wouldn't be able to do everything that we're doing if the funds weren't released, so we are looking at what will we prioritize? And that is something that we would bring back to you." 

For the funding to be canceled, it first has to be filed through Congress on Aug. 15.

"So if nothing is submitted, then we can expect that we're going to get that funding, and we can move forward," Phillips said. 

"If something is submitted, at that point, Congress would have 45 days, a decision would be made, and then at the end of 45 days, my understanding is, if there's no decision, we would have to get the funding but if there is a decision in favor of cutting the funds, we would then be notified, and that would be Sept. 30." 

She described the district as "in a holding pattern" and reported speaking to staff who may be impacted so they don't hear the information first in a public forum and have the opportunity to ask questions. 

While they won't have an answer by the next School Committee meeting, updates will be provided when the information is received. 

Chair William Cameron hopes those proposing the cuts will realize that they have children in public schools in their congressional districts and "most of those grants have a direct effect on classroom performance, so one can hope that self-interest will prevail there." 

This was Phillips' first meeting with the committee. 

"Thank you all for providing me with this opportunity to lead the public school system for your community," she said. 


Tags: federal grants,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Lanesborough Looks to Dissolve Baker Hill Road District

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

LANESBOROUGH, Mass. — The Select Board is looking to move forward with dissolving the Baker Hill Road District, which is hindering the Berkshire Mall sale.

On Friday, the Select Board heard from Vice Chair Juli Baker and Chair Deborah Maynard on how Tuesday negotiations went with Cypress Equities, JMJ Holdings, town counsel, the town administrator, and state Rep. John Barrett III. 

Baker said that during Tuesday's meeting, everyone agreed the goal was to have a successful sale of the mall for redevelopment as it’s in the best interest of the town.

Baker said Barrett assured them the state is willing to take the Connector Road and that the state is willing to provide grants to the town to renovate the water and sewer infrastructure, with an estimated total of $4.5 million, to facilitate the property's redevelopment.

"We have received assurances from Representative Barrett that the Commonwealth will provide the monies and will take the Connector," Baker said.

While buyer Cypress Equities saw some benefit in keeping the district, it now doesn't since the state is willing to provide the funds and renovate the infrastructure, according to Baker. 

Baker said that in the meeting, Cypress Equities prefers to enter into a tax increment financing (TIF) and will add to the agreement an amount of funding for public safety services, which would have come from the district. She said Cypress said it would rather enter into one agreement with the town than two agreements with the town and the district.

Mall owner JMJ Holdings is willing to pay $350,000 to the town upon closing, Baker said. 

The meeting Friday was to consider moving forward with a dissolution of the district.

"But the decision that it hinges on tonight is whether to move forward to the dissolution of the Baker Hill Road District in some manner," she said.

Baker said she has worked long and hard to see if there was another alternative to this, working closely with the district which has been "very cooperative and very helpful" in making changes.

The district had agreed to make changes to its governance and taxation; agreeing to have a cap for Cypress as well as agreeing to work to have the state take over the road, sending letters of support.

"What changed this for me is that I've always said it's important to have the special district because we get the public safety funding, and it's also important for the economic district to bring the features that an economic district brings because of what we're up against with the infrastructure problems, and the change at this point is that we have a buyer who is willing to supply that public safety money and commit to it over time, along with the TIF that the town would do, which is essential," she said.

"At this point, I feel like it's in the best interest of the town and protects the town the best in terms of a future where we can develop a mall and bring that economic benefit in. You definitely need to reduce taxes, and you cannot do that without a fully developed retail operation right there. So it's been, you know, deeply difficult decision making," Baker said.

Board members Jason Breault and Jeffery Walters agreed it was the best decision to move forward.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories