Lanesborough Planners Look to Clarify Signage Bylaws

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story
LANESBOROUGH, Mass. — The Planning Board looks to reword the town's sign bylaws after a recent contentious tussle over a business sign because of the way the bylaw could be interpreted.
 
Chair Courtney Dondi addressed the room beforehand, asking the attendees in the room to stay respectful.
 
"I know that our town is experiencing some tension around certain bylaw discussions, change, uncertainty, and complex zoning language can understandably cause frustration. This board does not create conflict. We manage processes," she said. "One of our responsibilities is to ensure that existing and proposed bylaws are revered, be reviewed thoughtfully, legally and transparently, which all take time. 
 
"We serve the entire town, not one group over another. Tonight, we will follow our agenda and maintain order so that every voice has the opportunity to be heard."
 
Planner Joe Trybus later expanded on her comments to explain the board doesn't make the rules.
 
"People always think it's the town and I just want to make clear to everybody that we do not make rules, we do not do anything like that," he said. "You come in, you have a suggestion, we talk about it. If this board agrees on doing something like that, we will write a bylaw to bring to the annual town meeting so everybody in this town can vote on it."
 
Inspired Creations owner Paula Messana said during public comment how she was told to take down a flutter flag because it was not allowed by the town bylaw.
 
She said it is hard for her business right now since the snow piles are reducing her storefront's visibility. The flag has helped her business significantly.
 
"My business increased like 45 percent with that flutter (feather) flag out there because now people from the street driving by could see hey there's a gift shop there," Messana said.
 
"I read somewhere that they didn't allow flutter flags because they're distracting. Well I can't tell you how many times driving to work in the morning I'm chicken-necking trying to read whose name is on that veterans flag. ...
 
"As a small business gift shop I'm dying a slow death right now because the snow banks are taller than my store and nobody can see me from the road and nobody stops and it's just extremely painful."
 
The bylaw currently states "two banner signs, not including feather flags, are allowed per business." Messana asked for the bylaw to include feather flags. 
 
Building Commissioner Brian Duval said if they were to add anything to the bylaws, it should include size dimensions to A-frame or sandwich board signs since there is no size limit currently.
 
After much discussion the board decided look at flutter flags, adding a limit and height requirements, and placement requirements; A-frame signs with size and placement requirements; to clarify whether banner signs can be freestanding or attached to buildings, and that they aren't obstructing drivers but still visible enough to help business owners.
 
The planners will also make other clarifications such as definitions of what's exempt and bring accessory signs into their own section.
 
They are also considering a temporary sign permit for new businesses until their permanent signs are approved and installed.
 
These changes will be drafted and reviewed in March at the next meeting.

Tags: Planning Board,   signage,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Lanesborough Seeks State Support for Berkshire Mall Redevelopment

By Sabrina DammsiBerkshires.com
LANESBOROUGH, Mass. — The town plans to petition the state to take ownership of the Route 7/Route 8 Connector Road, which officials believe is a "critical component" of the Berkshire Mall’s redevelopment strategy.
 
On Tuesday, the Select Board approved a letter to state Sen. Paul Mark and state Rep. John Barrett III to request their support for the vacant mall's redevelopment by helping advance transfer of the Route 7/Route 8 connector and considering funding for essential infrastructure.
 
"We have held discussions with the Baker Hill Road District … which will take the necessary steps to formally petition the commonwealth to take over ownership of the Route 7, Route 8 connector…Your continued support in facilitating this transfer is greatly appreciated," the letter says. 
 
Berkshire Mall owner JMJ RE Holdings has said the potential sale and redevelopment of the mall hinges on dissolving the Baker Hill Road District, a condition of the agreement that, if unmet, would render the contract null and void.
 
As a result, the mall will continue to deteriorate and the litigation will proceed forward, said Tim Grogan, of JMJ. 
 
Vera Farrell, the liaison to the Baker Hill Road District, said the district board had discussed at one of its most recent meetings that the connector road could be transferred directly to the state, rather than returned to the town; Barrett and Mark were also a part of the discussion.
 
"The representatives recommended that as an option, that it could transfer the connector road directly to the state, as opposed to deeding it back to the town to dispense it. If we get to that point, that would be a better option to do it that way," Farrell said. 
 
View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories