MassDOT Crossing Guard Appreciation Campaign

Print Story | Email Story

BOSTON – The Massachusetts Department of Transportation (MassDOT), announced the launch of the sixth annual Safe Routes to School Crossing Guard Appreciation Campaign, recognizing the role crossing guards play in keeping students and families safe across Massachusetts.  

The campaign begins with a Crossing Guard of the Year nomination period, followed by Crossing Guard Appreciation Day on March 25, and will culminate with the announcement of the 2026 Crossing Guard of the Year award winners. Award recipients will be recognized at the Annual Safe Routes to School Awards Ceremony in June.  

"All crossing guards play a vital role in keeping students and families safe across the Commonwealth, and while this contest provides an opportunity for the public to recognize those who serve their own communities with dedication every day, know that all are invaluable and we thank them for their service," said Interim MassDOT Secretary and MBTA General Manager Phillip Eng. "Under the Healey-Driscoll Administration, safety remains everyone's top priority, and we encourage the public to nominate the crossing guards who continue to make a difference in the lives of students and families. Thank you to everyone who helps keep our children safe on their way to and from school." 

Last year, the Safe Routes to School (STRS) program received an overwhelming number of nominations, resulting in multiple honorees at the 2025 annual awards ceremony. Jill Boyd (Braintree) Soleil Hanger (Pittsfield) and Lie-Mei Ho (Newton) received the Crossing Guard Champion Award. Bridget and Gerry Buckley (Boston) received the Honorable Mention Award, and Gina Hayes (Malden) was named Crossing Guard of the Year.  

The nomination period opened on Sunday, March 1, closes at 5:00 p.m. on Crossing Guard Appreciation Day, Wednesday, March 25. On that day, schools and students are encouraged to recognize the crossing guards in their community in ways that are meaningful to them.  

The nomination form, a printable thank-you cards, and promotional flyers are available on the SRTS website in the Engagement section. Schools must be SRTS partners in order for their Crossing Guards to be eligible. Previous award recipients are not eligible. The number of nominations received does not impact a crossing guard's chances of selection, and communities are encouraged to collaborate on thoughtful submissions.  


Tags: MassDOT,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

SJC: Public Records Petition 'Proper'

Staff Reports
BOSTON — The Supreme Judicial Court in an advisory opinion released Monday found the petition to bring the Legislature and governor's office under the Public Records Law is "proper" as a form of law.
 
"Its principal purpose is not to regulate the internal proceedings or operations of the two Houses," the court wrote. "Instead, its principal purpose is to provide the public with a new right of access to the records of the General Court and the office of the Governor, applying the existing public records law to those bodies alongside the other governmental bodies already subject to the law. "
 
The state Senate asked the Supreme Judicial Court to weigh in on whether public records petition was a violation of the state constitution. The Legislature is required to act on the matter by May 5; if not, supporters plan to put it on the ballot in November. 
 
Auditor Diana DiZoglio has championed the petition as a measure to bring greater transparency to the workings of state government and as part of her own battle to audit the Legislature. More than 70 percent of voters approved the audit question in November 2024. 
 
The Senate asked the court whether, first, the petition was a law or a rule that would interfere with its internal processes and, second, would it create "new and unprecedented authority" to the courts to determine challenges to records determinations.
 
The court offered "that the petition proposes a law and is therefore properly pending before the Legislature" and, for Question 2, concluded "that the proposed measure does not relate to the powers of courts."
 
The court declined to answer three following questions related to intrusions on Senate authority and General Court authority, and violation of rights of  "deliberation, speech and debate" granted to members and staff.
View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories