Pittsfield Seeks Input on CDBG Spending

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The city is seeking input on where this year's Community Development Block Grant dollars should be allocated. 

A public hearing was held on Tuesday at Berkshire Athenaeum. Nate Joyner, Pittsfield's community development and housing program manager, believes this was the city's 51st CDBG hearing. 

Last year, Pittsfield received about $1.2 million from the federal government for projects involving public facilities, public services, housing rehabilitations and demolitions, and economic development. This year's allocation is expected to be around the same. 

"It's a federal program intended to provide decent, safe, and sanitary housing, provide a suitable living environment, and expand economic opportunities for primarily low and moderate-income residents," he explained. 

"There are some rules on how those funds can be spent, but a minimum of 70 percent of the funds need to directly benefit what they call low or moderate income people, and no more than 30 percent of the funds can be used to address slum or blight." 

On Tuesday, snow and slush washed over the region, affecting the turnout at the hearing and canceling other events that day. 

The Department of Community Development is preparing to draft its 2026 Annual Action Plan for the federal funds, with the program year beginning July 1. The U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development provides CDBG funds annually under Title 1 of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as amended.

A draft Annual Action Plan will be available on the city website beginning April 21, and a 30-day public comment period will follow.  There will be a public hearing for the plan on May 5 at City Hall.

The city is also conducting an online survey through March 20 that is expected to take 10-15 minutes to complete. 



Program eligibility guidelines define low income as ranging from $25,800 to $68,800 for one person, and between $36,850 and $98,250 for a household of four people. 

For FY 2026, the HUD Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program is poised to receive $3.3 billion in funding, maintaining the same level as FY 2025. 

Joyner reviewed last year's impact with the funds. 

In 2025, ten owner-occupied and renter-occupied units were rehabilitated, two new accessible ramps were placed on homes, and three condemned properties were demolished. On the public services and facilities side, Pittsfield saw sidewalk and curb ramps replaced in the Westside, an accessible bathroom at the Berkshire Athenaeum, neighborhood cleanups, and funding to 10 non-profits. 

The CDBG funds also provided technical assistance grants to for-profit businesses and led to the creation of 10 new jobs, and assisted local "micro-enterprises," which have no more than five employees. 

Of last year's more than $2 million budget, 52 percent of the CDBG funding went to housing rehab and demolitions, and 24 percent of the funds went to public facilities. The rest went to public services (13 percent) and economic development. (11 percent) 

The Human Services Advisory Council reviews applicable CDBG funding proposals, the Pittsfield Economic Revitalization Corporation reviews economic development proposals, and housing and applications have another process. 

Joyner explained that the city doesn't see many proposals for other projects, but the department reviews them when they come in.


Tags: CDBG,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Lanesborough Looks to Dissolve Baker Hill Road District

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

LANESBOROUGH, Mass. — The Select Board is looking to move forward with dissolving the Baker Hill Road District, which is hindering the Berkshire Mall sale.

On Friday, the Select Board heard from Vice Chair Juli Baker and Chair Deborah Maynard on how Tuesday negotiations went with Cypress Equities, JMJ Holdings, town counsel, the town administrator, and state Rep. John Barrett III. 

Baker said that during Tuesday's meeting, everyone agreed the goal was to have a successful sale of the mall for redevelopment as it’s in the best interest of the town.

Baker said Barrett assured them the state is willing to take the Connector Road and that the state is willing to provide grants to the town to renovate the water and sewer infrastructure, with an estimated total of $4.5 million, to facilitate the property's redevelopment.

"We have received assurances from Representative Barrett that the Commonwealth will provide the monies and will take the Connector," Baker said.

While buyer Cypress Equities saw some benefit in keeping the district, it now doesn't since the state is willing to provide the funds and renovate the infrastructure, according to Baker. 

Baker said that in the meeting, Cypress Equities prefers to enter into a tax increment financing (TIF) and will add to the agreement an amount of funding for public safety services, which would have come from the district. She said Cypress said it would rather enter into one agreement with the town than two agreements with the town and the district.

Mall owner JMJ Holdings is willing to pay $350,000 to the town upon closing, Baker said. 

The meeting Friday was to consider moving forward with a dissolution of the district.

"But the decision that it hinges on tonight is whether to move forward to the dissolution of the Baker Hill Road District in some manner," she said.

Baker said she has worked long and hard to see if there was another alternative to this, working closely with the district which has been "very cooperative and very helpful" in making changes.

The district had agreed to make changes to its governance and taxation; agreeing to have a cap for Cypress as well as agreeing to work to have the state take over the road, sending letters of support.

"What changed this for me is that I've always said it's important to have the special district because we get the public safety funding, and it's also important for the economic district to bring the features that an economic district brings because of what we're up against with the infrastructure problems, and the change at this point is that we have a buyer who is willing to supply that public safety money and commit to it over time, along with the TIF that the town would do, which is essential," she said.

"At this point, I feel like it's in the best interest of the town and protects the town the best in terms of a future where we can develop a mall and bring that economic benefit in. You definitely need to reduce taxes, and you cannot do that without a fully developed retail operation right there. So it's been, you know, deeply difficult decision making," Baker said.

Board members Jason Breault and Jeffery Walters agreed it was the best decision to move forward.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories