image description
The Ordinances and Rules subcommittee has endorsed the creation of Lake Management Commission to develop long-term plans for Onota and Pontoosuc Lakes.

Pittsfield Panel Supports Councilors' Privacy, Lake Management Commission

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — Councilors believe they have the right to keep their home address off work documents. 

Last week, the Ordinances and Rules subcommittee voted to remove city councilors' addresses from public documents and create a Lake Management Commission for Pittsfield's waterbodies. 

Ward 4 Councilor James Conant, Ward 7 Councilor Katherine Moody, Ward 1 Councilor Kenneth Warren, and Ward 2 Councilor Cameron Cunningham submitted a request to remove councilors' addresses from city documents and websites and replace them with 70 Allen St., or City Hall, to improve safety. 

"As we know, especially over the weekend, there's just increasing violence in America at every level, from the president right on down. Governors, judges, mayors, city councilors," Conant said. 

"I feel that we can increase our security by stopping using our home addresses on city-issued websites and paperwork." 

City Solicitor Jeffrey Grandchamp pointed out that this will not prevent the city officials' addresses from becoming public, as their addresses are listed elsewhere as residents. 

Conant proposed to make it optional. 

Councilors couldn't find anything in the city code that requires them to use home addresses. Ward 5 Councilor Patrick Kavey pointed out that when you run for office, the City Clerk verifies your address and residency. 

"Looking at what other communities do, it does, again, look like we're kind of in the minority in terms of how much information we're putting out to the public," Ward 6 Councilor Dina Lampiasi observed. 

"I like this petition." 

Councilor at Large Peter White doesn't think it changes anything if constituents know their exact addresses, versus knowing how to get in touch. 



Mayor Peter Marchetti reported that Conant suggested adding a Lake Management Commission. He explained, "Basically, we know after the number of phone calls we all received last year on the conditions of Onota and Pontoosuc Lake that there are issues." 

Last year, community members argued that erosion control plantings impeded access at Pontoosuc Lake, four easy access points were proposed, and a site visit with the Conservation Commission revealed that some of the bank erosion was worse than they believed. Small stairs were then proposed for that area instead. 

The commission will be expected to produce a three to five-year lake management plan based on water quality tests and plant surveys to identify areas for aquatic plant control and possible zebra mussel control applications. 

"Pittsfield lakes are an amazing resource treasure for all to enjoy. Our lakes are under stress from long-term and negative effects of climate change, introduction of invasive species, and stormwater outlet pollution from road salt usage," Conant said. 

"Our challenges are many, with increasing threats from evasive plants such as Eurasian milfoil, zebra mussels, cyanobacteria blooms, and beaver activity. Lake water drawdowns have been limited by DEP's new rulings and only are now limited to a maximum of three feet." 

He explained that the goal is to improve communication and education with the public on lake challenges as they develop, and what is needed to alleviate them.

Pittsfield struggled with zebra mussel detections in 2024, as eDNA was detected in both Onota and Pontoosuc lakes. Last month, the state Department of Environmental Protection outlined options for restoring a polluted Pontoosuc Lake to health: determining the lake's capacity for pollution (Total Maximum Daily Load) and developing a Nine Element Watershed-based plan.

MassDEP said the lake is showing signs of nutrient pollution and eutrophication — a condition which promotes algae blooms, fish kills, and dead zones — and cited recent algae blooms that resulted in public health advisories.

"This is something that the city needs," Lampiasi said. 


Tags: lakes, ponds,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Lanesborough Looks to Dissolve Baker Hill Road District

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

LANESBOROUGH, Mass. — The Select Board is looking to move forward with dissolving the Baker Hill Road District, which is hindering the Berkshire Mall sale.

On Friday, the Select Board heard from Vice Chair Juli Baker and Chair Deborah Maynard on how Tuesday negotiations went with Cypress Equities, JMJ Holdings, town counsel, the town administrator, and state Rep. John Barrett III. 

Baker said that during Tuesday's meeting, everyone agreed the goal was to have a successful sale of the mall for redevelopment as it’s in the best interest of the town.

Baker said Barrett assured them the state is willing to take the Connector Road and that the state is willing to provide grants to the town to renovate the water and sewer infrastructure, with an estimated total of $4.5 million, to facilitate the property's redevelopment.

"We have received assurances from Representative Barrett that the Commonwealth will provide the monies and will take the Connector," Baker said.

While buyer Cypress Equities saw some benefit in keeping the district, it now doesn't since the state is willing to provide the funds and renovate the infrastructure, according to Baker. 

Baker said that in the meeting, Cypress Equities prefers to enter into a tax increment financing (TIF) and will add to the agreement an amount of funding for public safety services, which would have come from the district. She said Cypress said it would rather enter into one agreement with the town than two agreements with the town and the district.

Mall owner JMJ Holdings is willing to pay $350,000 to the town upon closing, Baker said. 

The meeting Friday was to consider moving forward with a dissolution of the district.

"But the decision that it hinges on tonight is whether to move forward to the dissolution of the Baker Hill Road District in some manner," she said.

Baker said she has worked long and hard to see if there was another alternative to this, working closely with the district which has been "very cooperative and very helpful" in making changes.

The district had agreed to make changes to its governance and taxation; agreeing to have a cap for Cypress as well as agreeing to work to have the state take over the road, sending letters of support.

"What changed this for me is that I've always said it's important to have the special district because we get the public safety funding, and it's also important for the economic district to bring the features that an economic district brings because of what we're up against with the infrastructure problems, and the change at this point is that we have a buyer who is willing to supply that public safety money and commit to it over time, along with the TIF that the town would do, which is essential," she said.

"At this point, I feel like it's in the best interest of the town and protects the town the best in terms of a future where we can develop a mall and bring that economic benefit in. You definitely need to reduce taxes, and you cannot do that without a fully developed retail operation right there. So it's been, you know, deeply difficult decision making," Baker said.

Board members Jason Breault and Jeffery Walters agreed it was the best decision to move forward.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories