Two Charter Objections Called at Pittsfield City Council Meeting, One for the FY23 Budget

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story
Rinaldo del Gallo, who proposed the nip bottle ban diplays one before downing it at Tuesday's City Council meeting.

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — Tuesday's City Council meeting saw two charter objections, one for the city's $189 million fiscal 2023 budget and another on a petition to ban nip bottles in Pittsfield.

Ward 2 Councilor Charles Kronick halted the council's vote on the $189 million fiscal 2023 budget. This will void all of the recommended amendments that were made to the proposal over four nights of deliberations.  

These include an additional $1,000 to the Retired Senior Volunteer Program (RSVP,) $65,000 for school maintenance, and $50,000 to the building inspector's department, and a recommendation for the Pittsfield Police to earmark up to $250,000 in grant money to have additional clinicians as co-responders.

Kronick proposed the amendment to RSVP.

Councilor at Large Earl Persip III was visually and audibly frustrated with the motion, which the councilor said he made on behalf of his ward. Persip commented something along the lines of "you've got to be joking" after the charter objection and walked out of the room.

"I think it's a cop-out. It doesn't accomplish anything. It doesn't do anything. It delays the process and I don't believe he understands what actually his charter objection did to the budget and the things that we actually accomplished, especially around mental health, this year," Persip said after the meeting.

"He has nixed all that accomplishment that we pulled off this year, and I was very proud of some of the things we did but they don't matter."

Before the charter objection was solidified, President Peter Marchetti made sure that Kronick knew what his action would entail.

"Let me make you aware that if you charter object, we cannot take up this budget until the June 26 meeting, and the 45 days in the charter will pass and the mayor will have her original budget without the increases that we've put forward," He said.

"Is that what you really want to do?"

The original budget amount is $188,706,018. A special meeting could have been called to challenge the charter objection but after it was made, Ward 7 Councilor Anthony Maffuccio supported it.

Kronick has made a number of stances against the budget during deliberations. Notably, he scrutinized Chief Diversity Officer Michael Obasohan's credentials for an annual salary of around $90,000 and made a transphobic comment pertaining to the Office of Diversity Equity and Inclusion.

"People want to know how to talk to everybody else, are you a 'he,' 'she,' or 'her,' my sister, she's a ‘she' and 'her' she put it in her LinkedIn thing and I'm never confused when I talk to her," Kronick said at the May meeting.



"I feel, and maybe it's just an opinion, but I don't think it's just an opinion, I think that this is sort of a commonsense sort of thing, you know what you are because we were told that when you were born. It is a religious principle of mine, I think that what we're talking about here is spending money on things that you can research on the side."

After unsuccessfully motioning to send a petition from local attorney Rinaldo Del Gallo III to ban nip bottles in the city to the Green Commission, Persip called for a charter objection.

This was met with exasperated laughter but it wasn't the only time that council chambers were giggling that night. While presenting his petition, Del Gallo displayed a nip bottle as a prop and took a swig from it at the podium.

Last week, the Ordinances and Rules subcommittee rejected the petition after hearing from several liquor store owners about how it would financially cripple the businesses. The owners also spoke at the city council meeting and said they are committed to addressing the issue of people littering the tiny liquor bottles.

Persip argued that the only solution to nip bottle litter is for the state to put a five-cent bottle deposit on them. Del Gallo presented a motion to refer the petition to the Green Committee, which meets on an ad hoc basis, to weigh in on the situation.

He supports the ban to get the state's attention and wanted the petition to at least to be referred off so that the conversation doesn't end.

"I ask you all that's what was being done before this petition came up? Zilch, nothing." Persip said.

"If this goes away, nothing happens."

The motion to refer the ban to the committee failed 3-8 with just Persip, Maffuccio, and Ward 6 Councilor Dina Guiel Lampiasi voting in favor.

Maffuccio was 50/50 on the ban at the subcommittee meeting but is now in favor of it. He called the nip bottle litter a hindrance throughout the whole city.

"This is blight," he said, "I understand lottery tickets are a problem, I understand cups are a problem, you know what? Cigarette packs are a problem. This is a problem. Everything's a problem but we have to start somewhere."


Tags: fiscal 2023,   pittsfield_budget,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Lanesborough Select Board Tables JMJ Negotiations

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

LANESBOROUGH, Mass. — Tensions swirled at Monday's Select Board meeting in light of conversations to dissolve the Baker Hill Road District.

The meeting started with public comment, including from Tim Grogan, development consultant for JMJ RE Holdings, who emphasized that without a dissolution of the road district, the potential sale and redevelopment with the mall would fall through. 

He said the town expects about $760,000 in fiscal 2027 from the road district plus normal taxation. With redevelopment and no district, total income is projected to be around $1.1 million by 2029, he said, implying about a $300,000 annual surplus versus the status quo. He said he provided those calculations to the board.

Keeping the road district alive is not a compromise, Grogan said, referring to a proposal floated by the board last week to facilitate the mall's sale and work with the road district to reduce its tax assessment.

"This mentality by previous select boards and the Baker Hill Road District is what led the property to its current condition," he said. "Further, the Baker Hill Road District has every motive to make this compromise work, as their alternative is dissolution and non-existence. This practice is inherently in bad shape, and JMJ will not entertain any circumstance where the Baker Hill Road District continues to exist. 

"JMJ is inclined and trying to be treated like any other business in the town, and taxes such just like every other major shopping center in the state, keeping the Baker Hill Road District in place will continue to discourage redevelopment, and in this moment will break the delicate balance that has been negotiated between JMJ, Lanesborough, and [buyer Cypress Equities] to the point where the project is no longer feasible, and the only choice is litigation." 

Lyndon Moors, chair of the Finance Committee and recent appointee to the district's Prudential Committee, spoke personally in favor of keeping the district. He said it currently provides more than $500,000 per year to the town, which helps fund two police officers, fire and police vehicles, and over $100,000 per year for the Department of Public Works. He said losing that revenue could significantly impact town services and future budgets, especially as free cash may be lower going into FY28. 

He suggests downsizing the district's budget to reduce the tax burden on the mall and Target, which owns its building separately, while still maintaining revenue for the town. The board should let the litigation play out and not be too hasty in making decisions, he said.

"I think it is unlikely that we will see $1.1 million from the mall property without Baker Hill Road District in FY29. That's what I just heard. We are in FY27 right now. I think that's very unlikely two fiscal years from now, that we are enjoying the tax benefits to the tune of $1.1 million. So I would encourage the Select Board to put on the brakes a little bit, continue to be thoughtful, responsive, deliberative, and let's continue to do what's best for the town," Moors said.

Moors mentioned a Facebook post posted by Blake Mensing, one of the owners of JMJ, on the town group with documents that could be relevant to the meeting, saying it looked as though he was trying to negotiate in public. Mensing said it was an exercise of his First Amendment rights and an attempt to provide transparency to residents, especially since JMJ's opportunity to speak is limited to public comment.

Vice Chair Juli Baker suggested the compromise, said she and board member Michael Murphy have had "very robust and constructive discussions with the district."

"The purpose of it was to see if we could work with them to lessen the special tax burden that the district imposes on the owners, all owners of the mall properties, and while keeping the special tax district in place to preserve the police, fire, police car, and road maintenance services that we received from that special taxation," she said. 

Baker said the district is also interested in giving the road to the state, if the state allows. They also reviewed the district's $800,000 budget and discussed reductions but have not made concrete decisions.

"We find a great deal of interest in helping cut the budget there so that it would reduce the tax burden as well," she said. "So we're not ready with specific numbers yet on that, but there's certainly the willingness to make some major cuts into that budget."

Chair Deborah Maynard said she wants to dissolve the BHRD and that she would not want them to go ahead with the discussions.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories