Pittsfield Local Receipts Trending High, Cannabis Revenues Dropping

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — Halfway through fiscal 2023, the city's collected more than 50 percent of its projected receipts and seems on track to take in more than expected.

"I think we are tracking in a way where local receipts will yet again exceed the actuals, will exceed our estimates," Finance Director Matthew Kerwood reported to the Finance subcommittee on Thursday, adding that this is one of the ways that free cash is generated.

Some $6,604,208 was collected by the end of the second quarter on Dec. 31, 51.4 percent of the estimated total of $12,845,725.  Free cash is now at more than $17 million, up from around $5.3 million in fiscal 2021.

These receipts, which include meals and hotel/motel taxes, plummeted in fiscal 2021 due to the pandemic but have been rebounding since.  

A couple of years ago, cannabis tax dollars surpassed expectations due to a boom in new dispensaries. But market saturation is bringing prices down and revenue numbers are now dropping.

Of the estimated $800,000 in cannabis tax, $332,491 was collected by the end of the second quarter, representing 41.6 percent.  

"When you're the only game in town you can charge $300, I'm just making that up, but when there are four players in town, the price point is going to fluctuate," Kerwood said.

There are about seven dispensaries in the city including Temescal Wellness, Berkshire Roots and Bloom Brothers.

Kerwood said he may have to make adjustments downward in that local receipt if the trend continues to happen.

Twenty-five percent of cannabis revenue goes into the public works stabilization account that was created in 2019, 25 percent goes to the stabilization fund, and 50 percent goes to the general fund.


The stabilization fund currently totals $5,148,695, the public works stabilization fund $255,670, and there is $17,130,565 in free cash certification as of Dec. 15.

During the meeting, the subcommittee voted against transferring and appropriating $2 million from certified free cash to the general stabilization account and transferring and appropriating $2 million from certified free cash to the Other Post-Employment Benefits trust account.

They did vote in favor of transferring $2 million in free cash to the public works stabilization account.

Council President Peter Marchetti suggested putting the additional $2 million into public works over the general stabilization account because it will still make more money in investment and can be used to purchase new equipment or do additional road work.

Kerwood also pointed out expenses to watch, which included a 123.2 percent spending of the $800,000 budget for winter maintenance and overtime. 

"This is as of Dec. 31, so anything associated with the Christmas storm would not be part of this expense," he explained.

"But between the two accounts, it's $800,000, there [was a] $3,150 budget adjustment. As of Dec. 31, what had been spent was $486,687. There was another $503,204 encumbered as of Dec. 31, which if you take what has been actually been spent in the encumbrance, it is at 123 percent."

Under state law, this is the only account that can be deficit spent.


Tags: fiscal 2023,   pittsfield_budget,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Pittsfield Council Rejects Federal Police Drone Grant

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The City Council on Tuesday rejected a $31,000 police drone grant after a larger conversation about surveillance and responsible data storage. 

On the agenda was $31,167 from the Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Assistance, for the Edward J. Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant Program. For about two hours, councilors dug into the U.S. Department of Justice contract, found grammatical errors, and what they described as abnormally worded conditions and red flags. 

"It's not even like one red flag. It's like a whole field of red flags," Ward 7 Councilor Kathy Moody said.

They voted 9-2 to reject the grant, with only Ward 1 Councilor Kenneth Warren and Ward 3 Councilor Matthew Wrinn in favor.  

"We should not approve a grant where the contract goes against our own policies, whether it be state or local policies, or whether the requirements in that contract go against our community's values," Councilor at Large Alisa Costa said. 

"And what I heard from residents before this meeting, and what was a concern that I flagged when I first read this, is that it does go against my values and the values of our neighbors and us wanting to protect people." 

Open microphone speakers said provisions in the contract violate the Massachusetts PROTECT Act, which Gov. Maura Healey signed last month to establish statewide limits on state and local cooperation with federal civil immigration enforcement. 

"I'm particularly concerned about Condition 53, that would essentially require police officers to report to [the Department of Homeland Security] anyone who is being released from custody from a correctional facility, which would include local jails," resident Kamaar Taliaferro said. 

"Condition 54. This condition is in direct violation of the PROTECT Act." 

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories