image description

Pittsfield Council Narrowly Opposes Mosquito Spraying

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The city will not resume mosquito spraying.

The City Council 5-6 shot down a request to repeal the 2021 decision that discontinued the adulticide spraying portion of the Berkshire County Mosquito Control Project.

The body was divided with Ward 2 Councilor Charles Kronick, Ward 6 Councilor Dina Lampiasi, Ward 7 Councilor Anthony Maffucio and Councilors at Large Peter White, Karen Kalinowsy and Earl Persip III, Councilor voting against the restoration of spraying. 

Voter for the spraying was Ward 1 Councilor Kenneth Warren, Ward 3 Councilor Kevin Sherman, Ward 4 Councilor James Conant, Ward 5 Councilor Patrick Kavey and President Peter Marchetti.

Earlier this month, the Board of Health agreed to urge the council to bring back spraying due to the presence of West Nile virus in mosquito samples.

Three mosquitos have tested positive for the virus but there has been no reported human case.

"It's obvious to me that we do have a health issue and we need to revisit this vote and repeal the action from April of 2021," said Conant, who submitted the petition request.

The Berkshire County Mosquito Control Project uses a truck spray applicator with a 300-foot range for the application. The mosquito-killing pesticide is said to have a minimal impact on humans and wildlife, which some councilors rebutted.

White pointed out that previous councils have made it clear that they are not comfortable with spraying.

"You're only coming to us tonight because there's been the three, that we should take seriously, West Nile virus findings. However, we could have West Nile virus findings all over the county," he said.

"However, over 20 communities in Berkshire County have decided that the Berkshire Mosquito Control Project is not worth the cost on their cherry sheet. That's another concern to me that so many of our neighbors who are more rural and probably could have more mosquitoes based on what their geography is have chosen not to be a part of this program."

White pointed out that the city is not required to continue with mosquito control, as the council approves its funding. Currently, the project is still treating the city with pre-emptive larval control and catch basin operations.

Persip said he voted to stop the spraying and he will not vote to resume it.


"We have a way bigger tick problem and tick disease than mosquitos," he said. "If you get the numbers of how many people go to the hospital for tick-borne illnesses versus mosquito-borne illnesses it would really jump out at you."

There were also arguments that the truck spraying is not very effective and councilors had a problem with the fact that a BCMCP board member worked for the pesticide supplier. Superintendent Chris Horton reported that the board member had retired from the company but remains and that his expertise qualifies him.

Horton said the city's mosquito control plan uses products that have been approved federally, at the state level, and locally by the Board of Health. Research done by Louisiana State University found that the application procedures do not kill bees, he added.

"They've been determined to be not a risk to the population by all of these entities and the City Council overrode the decision of the Board of Health and experts in the field all the way up to the [U.S. Centers for Disease Control,]" he said.

"I think it's a little ridiculous to think that the work and knowledge of this body of evidence and these people who are leaders in public health worldwide when they come to these conclusions that this is the recommended course of action. I don't understand why the City Council or individuals would take another course based on a short walk into the field."

Sherman said his vote to resume spraying was based on the amount of constituent feedback that he received.

"I've received a lot. Not one saying no. All of them saying yes," he said. "Tremendous points have been made here tonight and I respect everybody's opinions. I'm going to stick by my original gut and vote with Councilor Conant to repeal it because of the amount of people, because that's what we've heard a lot in this chamber over the last two years, is the people, the people, and the people have been saying that."

Conant said his constituents in Ward 4 are overwhelmingly in favor of the repeal, which is why he brought it forward.

"I respect all my councilors up here. We all know how challenging this position can be at times. A lot of viewpoints up here I listen to," he said.

"I am a licensed educated pesticide applicator with 40 years of experience. Most of the viewpoints expressed up here this evening are very inaccurate."

During open microphone, one resident spoke in favor of spraying and one spoke against it.

The council did vote to refer the matter to the Board of Health and the Conservation Commission to develop guidelines and protocols for the application.


Tags: mosquito spraying,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

BRTA Focuses on a New Run Schedule

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Berkshire Regional Transit Authority is still working on maintaining its run schedules after dropping the route realignment proposal.

Last Thursday's meeting was Administrator Kathleen Lambert's first official meeting taking over the reins; retiring director Robert Malnati stayed during a transition period that ended last month.

Lambert is trying to create a schedule that will lessen cancellations. There was a two-hour meeting the week before with the drivers union to negotiate run bids and Lambert is working with the new operating company Keolis, which is taking over from Transdev.

The board spoke about anonymous emails from drivers, which Lambert said she has not seen. iBerkshires was not able to see those letters, but has received some. 

"They were lengthy emails from someone describing themselves as concerning BRTA employee, and there was a signed letter from a whole group of employees basically stating their concerns. So, you know, to me, it was a set of whistleblowers, and that, what my understanding is that this really triggers a need for some type of process to review the merits of these whistleblowers, not going to call them accusations, but basically expressions of concern," said member Stephen Bannon.

A letter iBerkshires received spoke of unhappy drivers who were considering quitting because of decisions being made without "input from frontline staff," frustration and falling morale, and the removal of the former general manager shortly after Lambert came in.

Lambert said it's difficult to navigate a new change. She also noted many drivers don't want to do Saturday runs and it has been hard negotiating with drivers on the new runs.

"I would like you all to keep in mind that the process of change is super difficult. Transdev has been here for 20 years, and some of these drivers have never known any other operating company, the way some of the operations have been handled has been archaic," she said. "So getting folks up to speed on how a modern transit system works is going to be painful for them. So I don't want to say that I'm unsympathetic, because I am sympathetic, but I am trying to coax people along with a system that's going to seem very strange to them."

The board spoke about better communication between them and Lambert, citing cooperation will be best moving forward.

"There's just a lot of stuff in the air right now, and there are a lot of fires to put out to make this a coordinated effort. And if we don't keep our communications open and be straightforward, then you get blindsided about how you know the input that you could get from us about your position, and how you know what's going on in your direction, and we get blindsided. And I think that we have to make sure that this is a collaboration," said member Sherry Youngkin.

"Both sides have responsibilities, because in the long run, this advisory board is going to have to make decisions as to how we brought forward and if we've gone forward in a fair and helpful way. And I think that's hopefully what everybody is looking for also." 

Transdev and Keolis held a three-day recruiting event interviewing almost 40 candidates and offering jobs to eight, but only three stayed on to start training. Lambert said it was disappointing but she will keep trying to retain more people.

In her first report to the board, she noted that ridership dipped a little over 10 percent, but still remains higher than last year, adding that was because of cancellations of services because of the lack of drivers.

Like the last meeting, some of the advisory board members were torn over the start of the Link413 service, worried that the start of the service took drivers away and the numbers of riders are low.

Lambert, however, said the ridership has doubled from last month.

"As I've spoken before, we have, generally, a six-month adoption for brand-new service before you can really go in and evaluate, are you being successful based on the grant that my predecessor wrote along with the team for PBTA and RTA, we are ahead of schedule, which is pretty good, so I'm hoping that will continue to improve," she said.

Member Renee Wood said the board never approved the service, adding the only thing she could find in the minutes was a vote to accept the equipment. She said it was supposed to be put on the agenda to discuss.

"The Link413 service has been three years in the making. It's been a grant that was accepted and has been working with our partners, PVTA and FRTA, to put into place. So I don't have the entire history of how that process worked, but it's been three years in the making, and did we not understand that once we accept that grant that we were going to put in new service?" Lambert said.

The board discussed if Title VI, the Civil Rights Act, was followed with an accurate review and accurate amount of time for public comment period on the service changes and if its attorney should review if the  grant conditions were properly followed.

Lambert said changes had the 60-day comment period included in the proposed route realignment packet, giving the opportunity for the community to respond to that as well but will look into the legality of the situation with their attorney.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories