Central Berkshire Shifts How it Addresses Student Offenses

By Sabrina DammsiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story
DALTON, Mass. — Central Berkshire Regional School District is shifting the way it addresses student offenses.
 
It will focus on restorative practices and away from exclusionary action, Assistant Superintendent Michael Henault told the School Committee at its last meeting.
 
The implementation of a more consistent code of conduct was recommended to the district following an equity audit so that there are more accountable interventions and expectations.
 
"We want everybody to feel like they're being treated fairly in all circumstances and this specifically is around discipline," Superintendent Leslie Blake-Davis said. 
 
The document focuses on not only being fair but also on accountable consequences and accountable interventions being consistent across the middle and high schools, 
 
This new code of conduct has not been implemented in the elementary schools yet, but the district is working toward that. 
 
"This will be used by our administrators to run student meetings at the beginning of the year so they're on the same page and so they understand the expectations in each building and the consequences that come from having behavioral infractions or not meeting those expectations," Henault said. 
 
He will also be meeting bimonthly with the individuals and administrators that handle disciplinary issues to continue to improve the document. 
 
A big component is ensuring that the schools have systems in place to support students who are not meeting behavioral expectations, Henault said. 
 
The district has built autonomy into the document so that administrators can discipline based on the circumstances of the incident but limit consequences they can choose from to make the responses more consistent, he said.
 
Historically, the vice principal at one school may have a different interpretation on how an incident should be disciplined than another school’s vice principal.
 
"There were really no guardrails around how the rule could be interpreted and so that might result in an out-of-school suspension for one student and detention for another," Henault said. 
 
The new code installs guardrails around these offenses, especially for minor infractions, so that the district is less reliant on suspensions. 
 
The first intervention level does not have any exclusionary practices and there are very few in the second level. 
 
Rather these infractions will be addressed with restorative practices or direct student support, like classes, interventions, and counseling before moving to suspension.
 
"We know suspension doesn't work, but suspension is also there for the safety of our students. So we keep suspension there, but hopefully rely on it less for minor infractions over time," Henault said. 
 
School Committee member Art Albert complimented the work done to create this new code of conduct that focuses on restorative intervention. 
 
"I know, as you know, suspension doesn't work. It's not an answer to anything and the more you do restorative, the more you're keeping kids in class. I'm curious, I'm excited about it, and I'm anxious to see how this goes after a year," Albert said. 
 
During the last School Committee meeting a parent and community leader called out the district for how it handles the safety and wellness of students and urged them to have the data externally audited.  
 
The committee addressed these concerns during a nearly 90 minute-long discussion during which they talked about the code of conduct. 
 
In addition to that, Blake-Davis and Henault spoke in depth on how student offenses are reported internally and to the state in addition to how offenses are addressed.  
 
The state requires that both allegations and findings of bullying are reported, Blake-Davis said. It's difficult because the district does report these findings but the state's definition of bullying is very specific. 
 
An incident that may be considered bullying to some may be reported under another category, like physical fighting or non-violent offenses. 
 
According to the presentation the state required the district to report on these nine categories: harassment (nonsexual), obscene behavior, other criminal offenses, other non-criminal offenses, theft, threat or intimidation resulting in fear or harm, tobacco, vandalism, and weapons possession. 
 
Bullying and other nonsexual harassment falls under the category "harassment: nonsexual," incidents including disorderly conduct, fighting, insubordination, minor physical altercation, and violation of school rules fall under the other non-criminal offenses category. 
 
The total number of all the student offenses was 212 incidents, which is a slight uptick from last year's 181. 
 
Of these offenses, a majority of them fell under the non-criminal offenses category, which had more than 75 incidents. The second and third highest categories reported were obscene behavior and tobacco. 
 
The district had 20 bullying allegations, Blake-Davis said. Of the 20, there were five findings of bullying. 
 
Although there has been an uptick in student offenses, statistically the district is below below the nationally increase in post-covid student offenses, Henault said. 
 
The district does keep track of and report allegations of bullying to the state but the state does not make that data available publicly, Blake-Davis said.
 
Heneault said the district is interpreting the bullying law and applying the standard the same way as other districts of similar sizes. 
 
When a report of bullying is made the school investigates the incident by interviewing staff and students and collecting witness statements. 
 
Using the information gathered they make determination and contact the parents or caregivers of the outcome. The complete investigation is also uploaded to PowerSchool, the district's software.
 
"We always, irregardless of our finding, if we think that there's any reasonable doubt around safety for any of the individuals involved we put a safe plan in place," Blake-Davis said.
 
"So the safe plan actually occurs prior to the investigation. If we are concerned for our students, if we're concerned for where they are in their settings, we make sure they have a safe plan in place."

Tags: bullying,   CBRSD,   student discipline,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

BRTA Focuses on a New Run Schedule

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Berkshire Regional Transit Authority is still working on maintaining its run schedules after dropping the route realignment proposal.

Last Thursday's meeting was Administrator Kathleen Lambert's first official meeting taking over the reins; retiring director Robert Malnati stayed during a transition period that ended last month.

Lambert is trying to create a schedule that will lessen cancellations. There was a two-hour meeting the week before with the drivers union to negotiate run bids and Lambert is working with the new operating company Keolis, which is taking over from Transdev.

The board spoke about anonymous emails from drivers, which Lambert said she has not seen. iBerkshires was not able to see those letters, but has received some. 

"They were lengthy emails from someone describing themselves as concerning BRTA employee, and there was a signed letter from a whole group of employees basically stating their concerns. So, you know, to me, it was a set of whistleblowers, and that, what my understanding is that this really triggers a need for some type of process to review the merits of these whistleblowers, not going to call them accusations, but basically expressions of concern," said member Stephen Bannon.

A letter iBerkshires received spoke of unhappy drivers who were considering quitting because of decisions being made without "input from frontline staff," frustration and falling morale, and the removal of the former general manager shortly after Lambert came in.

Lambert said it's difficult to navigate a new change. She also noted many drivers don't want to do Saturday runs and it has been hard negotiating with drivers on the new runs.

"I would like you all to keep in mind that the process of change is super difficult. Transdev has been here for 20 years, and some of these drivers have never known any other operating company, the way some of the operations have been handled has been archaic," she said. "So getting folks up to speed on how a modern transit system works is going to be painful for them. So I don't want to say that I'm unsympathetic, because I am sympathetic, but I am trying to coax people along with a system that's going to seem very strange to them."

The board spoke about better communication between them and Lambert, citing cooperation will be best moving forward.

"There's just a lot of stuff in the air right now, and there are a lot of fires to put out to make this a coordinated effort. And if we don't keep our communications open and be straightforward, then you get blindsided about how you know the input that you could get from us about your position, and how you know what's going on in your direction, and we get blindsided. And I think that we have to make sure that this is a collaboration," said member Sherry Youngkin.

"Both sides have responsibilities, because in the long run, this advisory board is going to have to make decisions as to how we brought forward and if we've gone forward in a fair and helpful way. And I think that's hopefully what everybody is looking for also." 

Transdev and Keolis held a three-day recruiting event interviewing almost 40 candidates and offering jobs to eight, but only three stayed on to start training. Lambert said it was disappointing but she will keep trying to retain more people.

In her first report to the board, she noted that ridership dipped a little over 10 percent, but still remains higher than last year, adding that was because of cancellations of services because of the lack of drivers.

Like the last meeting, some of the advisory board members were torn over the start of the Link413 service, worried that the start of the service took drivers away and the numbers of riders are low.

Lambert, however, said the ridership has doubled from last month.

"As I've spoken before, we have, generally, a six-month adoption for brand-new service before you can really go in and evaluate, are you being successful based on the grant that my predecessor wrote along with the team for PBTA and RTA, we are ahead of schedule, which is pretty good, so I'm hoping that will continue to improve," she said.

Member Renee Wood said the board never approved the service, adding the only thing she could find in the minutes was a vote to accept the equipment. She said it was supposed to be put on the agenda to discuss.

"The Link413 service has been three years in the making. It's been a grant that was accepted and has been working with our partners, PVTA and FRTA, to put into place. So I don't have the entire history of how that process worked, but it's been three years in the making, and did we not understand that once we accept that grant that we were going to put in new service?" Lambert said.

The board discussed if Title VI, the Civil Rights Act, was followed with an accurate review and accurate amount of time for public comment period on the service changes and if its attorney should review if the  grant conditions were properly followed.

Lambert said changes had the 60-day comment period included in the proposed route realignment packet, giving the opportunity for the community to respond to that as well but will look into the legality of the situation with their attorney.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories