A site grading plan prepared by Williamstown's Guntlow and Associates for Northern Berkshire Habitat for Humanity's proposed subdivision off Summer Street in Williamstown.
Williamstown Con Comm Clears Summer Street Subdivision
WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass. — The Conservation Commission last week gave its approval for a four-home subdivision on a town-owned parcel on Summer Street.
Northern Berkshire Habitat for Humanity was before the board with a notice of intent to build a 260-foot road with four associated building lots on a parcel currently owned by the town's Affordable Housing Trust.
The road and some of the home lots are planned in the buffer zone of a bordering vegetated wetland on the lot currently known as 0 Summer St.
Habitat plans to build four single-family, one-story homes priced for residents making up to 60 percent of the area median income on the parcel. The non-profit hopes the town will accept the road and associated infrastructure as a town road once it is built.
In addition to determining that the construction would minimize impact on the buffer zone, the commissioners Thursday reviewed the stormwater management plan for the site — an aspect that has been a sticking point for nearby residents who say drainage problems are a long-standing concern in the area.
Charlie LaBatt of Guntlow and Associates civil engineering took the lead on walking the commission through the plan to handle stormwater runoff from the increased impervious surfaces in the planned subdivision.
"Proposed drainage improvements include a rain garden, which acts for filtering of TSS [total suspended solids] and detention and very little recharge — due to the site's soil constraints — and a culvert that helps allow in one portion of this [parcel] the watershed to make it to that rain garden," LaBatt said. The rain garden and the stormwater management infrastructure has been sized anticipating the development of the four lots.
"It doesn't include impervious areas just for the road, it includes impervious areas for all of the four lots — buildings, roads, everything."
LaBatt further explained that grading along the boundary of the property will help direct water into the rain garden and the garden itself will have an underdrain to prevent it from becoming a pond.
Kayla Falkowski of 11 Summer St., whose home is due south and downhill of the subdivision site, said she was still concerned about the rain garden being overwhelmed and ponding.
LaBatt told the commission that the rain garden will have an outlet structure that will pipe excess water into existing municipal infrastructure on Summer Street.
"Once water comes above the bottom crest of the weir, water can go directly out of the detention pond and into the pipe system that goes out," LaBatt said. "The size and height and width of those weirs, as well as the size of the rain garden is what is modeled to create a system that gets peak runoff from post-development to be at or below pre-development runoff conditions.
"As described in the stormwater narrative [of the NOI submission], we have a table that shows you what the 2-, 10- and 100-year post-development storm rates are for this and how we've reduced [runoff] for all storm events."
Falkowski noted that she appreciated that the final plans for the rain garden include a fence around the feature, which is planned for the southwest corner of the parcel, bordered by Summer Street, the new road and her property.
But residents who addressed the commission at Thursday's meeting continued to express concern about the plan, including how the rain garden will be maintained after the subdivision is built and the homes are occupied.
LaBatt explained that, typically, such infrastructure would be owned by the developer (in this case, Northern Berkshire Habitat for Humanity) until homes are sold, at which time it would be transferred to an homeowners association and often, at some point, a municipality. The non-profit, which does not want to saddle its homeowners with the responsibility of an HOA, is trying to track the process of town acceptance, LaBatt said.
Critics of the subdivision plan pointed to a letter from Williamstown's director of public works that cast doubt on whether the town would be amenable to that acceptance.
"Although we currently do not have specific language on rain gardens in the Town Code, it is my position that rain gardens should be classified as a type of detention basin and not accept ownership or maintenance thereof," Craig Clough wrote in a May 3 letter to the Planning Board, which, at the time, was considering a preliminary development plan for the subdivision.
Donald Dubendorf, a volunteer with Northern Berkshire Habitat for Humanity and retired attorney with experience representing clients before town boards and committees, told the Con Comm that the issue of who owns the rain garden going forward was not before the body.
"These plans before the commission make no representation of who owns the rain garden," Dubendorf said. "They simply say this is where it's going to be. It may be the case that, if we have to, we carve out a piece of that [property] and give the Affordable Housing Trust an easement to manage it until such time as it's taken over [by the town].
"But we've had extensive discussions with Craig Clough, the town manager and others about taking over, and I think we're making progress on that. So, at the end of the day, [the ownership issue] seems a bit of a red herring."
In the end, the Con Comm added stipulation to its approval that, "The operation and maintenance plan for the proposed rain garden shall be a continuing condition."
That was one of four conditions specific to the project that the commission added to its approval, along with the standard 25 local and state-mandated conditions for work near a water resource area.
After a unanimous vote to set the conditions and, thus, approve the project, an attendee at the meeting asked how the commission's decision could be appealed. Conservation agent Andrew Groff referred them to the commonwealth's Department of Environmental Protection regional office in Springfield.
The proposed subdivision still has a major regulatory hurdle to clear before it goes forward: a return trip to the Planning Board for a review of the final development plan.
In other business on Thursday, the Conservation Commission:
• Cleared the Massachusetts Department of Transportation's plan to resurface Route 7 from the Five Corners intersection south to the New Ashford line.
• OK'd work near an unnamed perennial stream on a property at 1382 Cold Spring Road.
• And reviewed the town's plan to stabilize the bank of the Hoosic River near the intersection of North Street (Route 7) and Syndicate Road. The town is waiting on approval from Mass DEP and the Natural Heritage and Endangered Species Program, but Groff asked the local body also weigh in during that review. The five commissioners at Thursday's meeting gave their informal support to the plan.
If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.
Your Comments
iBerkshires.com welcomes critical, respectful dialogue. Name-calling, personal attacks, libel, slander or foul language is not allowed. All comments are reviewed before posting and will be deleted or edited as necessary.
No Comments
Lanesborough Officials Review Schools' Budgets
By Stephen DravisiBerkshires Staff
Mount Greylock Superintendent Joseph Bergeron, left, addresses the Lanesborough Select Board and Finance Committee as School Committee member Curtis Elfenbein looks at the projection of a slide in the district's budget presentation.
LANESBOROUGH, Mass. — Town officials Monday appeared generally receptive to the fiscal year 2027 spending plans for the two public school districts that serve the town.
Superintendents from the Northern Berkshire Vocational Regional School District (McCann Technical School) and Mount Greylock Regional School District presented their respective FY27 budgets to a joint meeting of the town's Finance Committee and Select Board.
Both districts are sending significantly higher assessments for approval at Lanesborough's annual town meeting in June.
McCann Tech, which constituted a $317,109 expenditure for the town in the current fiscal year, is seeking $463,978 for the fiscal year that begins on July 1 even though the school's operating budget is up just 3.2 percent year to year.
The 46 percent increase in Lanesborough's share of McCann Tech's budget is is due to two factors: a rise in enrollment of town residents at the vocational school from 20 in 2025 to 29 in this school year and a capital assessment for the first round of payments — for interest only — for a roof and window replacement project on the North Adams campus.
The Mount Greylock assessment, a much larger component of Lanesborough's property tax bill, is up 10.99 percent from FY26 to FY27, from $6.8 million to $7.6 million.
Mount Greylock Superintendent Joseph Bergeron gave a budget presentation similar to one he has delivered twice to the district's School Committee and again last month to the Williamstown Finance Committee, explaining that while the FY27 budget maintains level services to students with a net reduction of three positions, a series of factors are driving much larger assessments to Mount Greylock's two member towns.
Bergeron answered that officials in both member towns told the district they did not want Mount Greylock using taxpayers' money to build their reserves. click for more
Our Friday Front Porch is a weekly feature spotlighting attractive homes for sale in Berkshire County. This week, we are showcasing 84 North Summer St.
click for more
The tax bill of a median-priced single family home will go up by 8.45 percent in the year that begins July 1 under a spending plan approved by the Finance Committee on Wednesday night.
click for more
Colleen Taylor and her brother and business partner Sean Taylor grabbed the concession offered by the Five Corners Stewardship Association, which purchased the store at the junction of Routes 7 and 43 in 2022.
click for more