image description
Demolition of GE's Building 12 was halted last month after a single air sample found PCBs exceeding the 'action level.'

PCBs Detection Pauses GE Demolition

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

GE says a stockpile of debris was within 50 feet of the air monitor, which is located along the boundary line with PEDA's property.

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — Elevated levels of PCBs in a single air sample have halted demolition work on the former General Electric site.

Authorities say the measurements are "conservative" and not a threat to public health.

The sample was taken between July 11 and July 12 and was received by the Pittsfield Economic Development Authority from an off-site laboratory on July 25. It was quickly forwarded to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency on the same day and work stopped.

"The exceedance does not constitute a health threat to the public," a regional representative from the EPA wrote to iBerkshires in an email. "These action levels are very conservative and furthermore this monitor was not located adjacent to public areas."

The higher levels of polychlorinated biphenyls in the sample is attributed to stockpiles of demolition debris from former GE buildings that were within 50 feet of the air sampling monitor, abutting the PEDA property. The EPA will evaluate PCB air data from sampling conducted the week of July 29 and decide if GE can resume operations, though PEDA has been given the OK to continue with backfill work on its property.

PEDA notified EPA and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection of the detection found in a sampling round conducted over 24 hours from July 11 to 12. The economic development authority received information late on July 25 from the off-site commercial laboratory and it was reportedly forwarded out on the same day.

"This 13-day turnaround time for receipt of air data from an off-site laboratory is a typical duration for this type of sampling event," the EPA representative said.

"GE will implement additional actions and engineering controls as part of their building demolition activities. EPA and Mass DEP will continue to provide close oversight of the ongoing activities being conducted by PEDA and GE."

PEDA is currently working on a nearly $10 million redevelopment of Site 9 on the former GE property.  This included removing the existing concrete surface and placing a clean backfill on the property.



The monitor with the exceedance is located along the PEDA-GE property line. GE's activity on the adjacent parcel consists of the demolition of the Building 12 complex, which are buildings where GE manufactured and tested transformers that used PCBs as dielectric fluids.

"The concentration detected at S9-2 was 0.2324 µ/m3 [micrograms per cubic meter] and the Action Level is 0.10 µ/m3. EPA determined that the source of airborne PCBs is from GE's Building demolition activities, not PEDA's backfilling activities," the EPA reported.

Both parties stopped work to reassess the situation, the EPA reportedly discussing it with the city on July 26. This was not considered an emergency or health threat to the public because the monitor is "well away" from private property and that monitors close to the Tyler Street extension were below health-based action and notification levels.

MassDEP reviewed the information provided by PEDA and concurred with EPA that the strong likelihood is that the source of PCBs was not PEDA's activities, rather the source of airborne PCBs emanated from GE property associated with the building demolition activities, the EPA reported.

PEDA was permitted to resume backfill operations on July 29 and GE remains under a stop-work status.

On July 26, GE provided a summary of its evaluation and stated that one of the stockpiles of demolition debris was within 50 feet of the air sampling location that had the exceedance, according to the EPA.

Even though it was not GE's monitors with the exceedance, it was directed to temporarily stop work and assess the situation. On top of daily dust monitoring, GE's proposed response actions are:

  • Perform air sampling at six locations.
     
  • Add a new sample location on the PEDA property near the location with the exceedance but farther to the south and west to account for the potential irregular wind patterns and impacts from the elevated vehicle ramp and retaining wall.
     
  • Resume demolition work upon receipt of results from this sampling round indicating that all sampling locations are less than the air action level.
     
  • Conduct weekly PCB air sampling at these six locations for at least four weeks or until GE has achieved four consecutive weeks of results less than the Action Level, at which time GE can propose moving to monthly sampling, subject to EPA approval.
     
  • Once work has resumed, GE will employ additional engineering controls such as reducing the size of onsite stockpiles and keeping stockpiles further away from the property line.

The EPA approved this response and stipulated that work can continue if a sample result is above the air PCB Notification Level but below the Action Level. However, GE should evaluate conditions, consider additional engineering controls, and discuss its findings and potential additional actions with EPA. The agency also said that if any additional sample results are above the air Action Level, GE will immediately stop work and notify EPA of the results.


Tags: contamination,   demolition,   General Electric,   PCBs,   PEDA,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

BRTA Looks to Another Year of Fare Free

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The BRTA is expecting another year of fare free rides.

Berkshire Regional Transit Authority Administrator Kathleen Lambert told the advisory board recently that she expects to receive $1.3 million in state funding to remain fare free. She said RTAs may be given up to $40 million this year statewide, which is $5 million up from last year.

While the state budget is not formally approved yet, the effect will take place on July 1.

The news came at the same time the board approved the BRTA's budget of $13.6 million, which is an increase of 11 percent since last fiscal year.

Some of the increases were in the fixed route area which jumped from $9 million to $12 million. Lambert said this is due to the contractual agreement between the union where they have a five percent raise for all of the drivers and other union members, as well as a seven percent raise for paratransit fleet operators.

Lambert said much of the costs raised were fuel costs because of the ongoing war in Iran. The authority uses about 8,000 gallons of fuel a month and has planned for $5.75 per gallon.

The customer service desk, which currently staffs two employees, will be shut down, she said. The two employees were given notice months in advance and one showed interest in becoming a bus driver and will plan to interview for that. Lambert said two new drivers have started and that the new transit company Keolis, which is taking over for Transdev, will continue to hold recruiting events. The new manager is Mark Moujabber, taking over for Bobby Quintos. 

Lambert told the board she believed there are discrepancies in ridership data. Deputy Administrator Benjamin Hansen, who was in operations before his current role, said the authority has been seeing low ridership because of route cancellations, however, this past month, the numbers did not make sense as demand has stayed the same but ridership seemed exponentially low.

To get the figures, bus drivers must manually push a button on the farebox to record passengers, wheelchairs, and bikes, which might have errors. There are automatic passenger counters (APCs) installed, but they are not certified, so are only used as a rough comparison tool as they are not accurate.

Board member Stuart Lawrence asked if there has been any investigation on if this might be deliberate. Hansen said there is not as he does not know how they could watch for that to happen.

Lambert said she has been working with professor Paula Consolini at Williams College, who will have a group of samplers who will ride the bus and gather a week's worth of data.

In the last meeting, the board spoke about anonymous emails from drivers, and a letter iBerkshires received spoke of unhappy drivers who were considering quitting because of decisions being made without "input from frontline staff," frustration and falling morale, and the removal of the former general manager shortly after Lambert came in.  

Multiple employees had also signed on to a vote of no confidence letter in the BRTA administration spearheaded by Raymond Killeen who is a bus driver and represents Cheshire on the advisory board. Killeen said losing Quintos was hard, stating he was an excellent general manager and not having him there led to hardships on accomplishing many things.

"Once the removal was there, it was difficult to accomplish certain things, because we had lost the general manager. So, the letter was an attempt to get things moving a little bit quicker, so we could provide a better service for the residents of Berkshire County. I don't know if it accomplished that. We were able to do some things, though, but the concern amongst rank and file here is that we're not providing the best service we possibly could, and we're hoping that when the new management team comes in, that can be accomplished," Killeen said.

Killeen said he was unhappy with the progress to a revised driver schedule. The day after the meeting, Lambert and the team had a meeting to discuss and negotiate run schedules, Lambert said it was a very good and productive meeting.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories