image description
The reconstruction of East Street has received an $8 million boost from the federal government. The project is being bid this week.

Pittsfield's East Street Redevelopment Gets Additional $8M

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The $14.6 million redevelopment of East Street has gotten a boost from redistribution funds.

Last week, the Healey-Driscoll administration announced the state Department of Transportation had received an additional $171 million in funding from the Federal Highway Administration as part of the annual funding redistribution process.

"These redistribution funds represent federal transportation funds that were unable to be used for programs in various states to which they were originally allocated," a press release explains.

"As part of this redistribution, MassDOT will add or increase funding for 12 infrastructure projects across Massachusetts."

Pittsfield is the only Berkshire County community to receive redistribution funds, with about $8,338,000 allocated to overhaul the well-used corridor.

A MassDOT representative reported that the funds are available immediately and must be obligated by Sept. 25. It will be advertised for bidding on Sept. 14 with work beginning in the springtime.

The total estimated construction cost for this project is approximately $14,597,000.

The project will widen the corridor from the intersection of East Street and Lyman Street to the intersection of East Street and Merrill Road, including landscaping and pedestrian amenities. It aims to improve safety, accessibility, and aesthetics with minimum environmental impacts while supporting Pittsfield as a gateway city.

All associated construction work qualifies for the funding.


Each year, the FHWA determines how much funding for the fiscal year will go unspent and seeks requests for projects that can use additional funding. It is a "use it or lose it" proposition and projects must be shovel-ready.

This year's redistribution is higher than the last four years, which averaged $94.3 million.

The City Council paved the way for the project in July, approving the takings of 12 permanent easements, 14 temporary easements, two layout alterations, and a permanent parcel.

A total of $10,000 will be paid out to property owners for permanent easements, with 765 East Street LLC receiving almost $4,000 for two parcels of land. Temporary easements will cost over $73,000, with 765 East Street LLC reviewing the largest award of more than $11,600.

There is also $1,680 in damage awards to two property owners for permanent takings.  

The Federal Highway Administration is funding 80 percent of the total construction costs with MassDOT picking up the additional 20 percent. It is scheduled to be programmed with the Transportation Improvement Program in fiscal 2026.

A public hearing was held in 2021, when the project engineer described the current sidewalk conditions as "deteriorating," citing a lack of proper Americans with Disabilities Act compliance on a curb cut at Lyman Street looking east, and a confusing unused driveway that is blocked by concrete barriers among other issues.

The corridor also has insufficient drainage which calls for a new stormwater drainage system included in the proposal.


Tags: federal funds,   MassDOT,   road project,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Letter: Real Issue in Hinsdale Is Leadership Failure

Letter to the Editor

To the Editor:

The Hinsdale Select Board recently claimed they are "flabbergasted" by the Dalton Police Department's decision to suspend mutual aid. This public display of confusion is staggering. It reveals a severe lack of leadership and a deep disconnect from the established facts.

Dalton did not make a rash or emotional choice. They made a strict, calculated decision to protect their own officers. Dalton leadership clearly stated their reasons. They cited deep concerns about officer safety, trust, training consistency, and post-incident accountability. These are massive red flags for any law enforcement agency.

These concerns stem directly from the fatal shooting of Biagio Kauvil. During this tragic event, Hinsdale command staff failed to follow their own policies. We saw poor judgment, tactical errors, and clear supervisory failures. When a police department breaks its own rules, it places both the public and responding officers at strict risk. No responsible outside agency will subject its own team to a command structure that lacks basic operational competence.

For elected officials to look at a preventable tragedy, clear policy violations, and the swift withdrawal of a neighboring agency, yet still claim confusion, shows willful blindness. If the Select Board cannot recognize the obvious institutional failures staring them in the face, they disqualify themselves from providing meaningful oversight.

We cannot accept leaders who dismiss documented failures and deflect blame. We must demand true accountability. The real problem is not that Dalton withdrew its support. The real problem is a Hinsdale leadership team that refuses to face its own failures.

Scott McGowan
Williamstown Mass.

 

 

 

 

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories