image description
The Select Board meets Tuesday night at the library.

Dalton Select Board Delays Special Election Decision

By Sabrina DammsiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story
DALTON, Mass. — The Select Board on Tuesday voted to delay any action on setting a special election to fill its vacant seat until the town confirms that proper legal procedures were followed.
 
The board was shown a citizen petition with 237 signatures from residents calling for a special election and an election timeline created by Town Clerk Heather Hunt based on office activity levels.
 
Hunt recommended having the special election no earlier than Jan. 27, Town Manager Thomas Hutcheson said. Hunt was not present during the meeting. 
 
An election should not be scheduled too early in January because the office will be busy with the census and dog license renewals, he said. 
 
Before calling a special election, the board members wanted to consult the town attorney because they were concerned about whether they were acting in full compliance with state laws. 
 
The decision was passed unanimously among present board members; Vice Chair Dan Esko was absent.
 
"In my opinion, everything up until this point is of questionable legalities, and that's why, at the meeting in September, I suggested that we consult with the town attorney before we do anything based on what's happened here," member John Boyle said.
 
"I mean, what could happen if you ignore these chapters and sub-chapters in Massachusetts General law and go and call an election without actually following all the steps — the election could be contested by a citizen in court and ruled invalid." 
 
When contacted Wednesday, Hunt said she wished she had attended the meeting because she could have clarified board members' confusion. 
 
On the day of the meeting, Hunt stated that she had spoken to Hutcheson several times to inquire if he would like her to attend. He declined, especially considering how busy the clerk's office has been given the presidential election and now being randomly being selected for a state post-election audit.  
 
The state post-election audit is a lottery in which only 3 percent of precincts are selected. 
 
"I really wish I was there because I feel like they had some information that was not correct, and I feel like it would have been helpful for me to provide them with correct information. Whether or not it would have changed the outcome, I doubt. I doubt that very much," Hunt said. 
 
"I think the outcome was going to be the outcome either way, but I could have provided them with some details that, for some reason, they apparently didn't have." 
 
During the meeting, Boyle presented several reasons that calling for a special election would go against state laws and could contested by a citizen in court and ruled invalid. 
 
One reason was that the board never received any certified documentation or resignation letter regarding the Select Board vacancy. 
 
Joseph Diver had announced that he would be stepping down from the board effective Oct 1 during a Select Board meeting in September. He resigned from his seat via an email he sent to Chair Robert Bishop, Hutcheson, and Hunt on Sept. 9 
 
Although Bishop obtained the email, he and Boyle claimed in a follow-up that they had not received a certified letter that had been notarized. 
 
This type of documentation is state law, Boyle said, citing a section of Chapter 41 Section 10 which reads:
 
"If there is a resignation of a town officer creating a vacancy at some later time certain, and such resignation is filed with the town clerk in accordance with the provisions of section one hundred and nine, said town clerk shall certify a vacancy shall occur at the later time certain and the board of selectmen may call a special election …"
 
Hunt said she was surprised by the board's confusion as to whether Diver officially resigned, explaining that she received his letter of resignation in September, which they printed, date-stamped, filed, and forwarded to the board chair and vice chair. 
 
"Joe Diver actually announced his resignation at a Select Board meeting. So, I took for granted that everybody knew that. Joe did everything by the book … if I was there in attendance, I certainly would have given that information to them again," she said.
 
"It wouldn't have been the first time we gave them that information, but we would have made sure that everybody felt comfortable with the fact that [Diver] did resign as of Oct. 1. 
 
Boyle also questioned the validity of the citizen petition, stating that the process was not properly followed. He claimed that the petition should have been presented to the board and then given to the town clerk for certification. 
 
However, Robert Collins, who previously ran for a seat on the Select Board and now serves on the Planning Board, took out the petition from the town clerk on Oct. 2. 
 
Boyle again cited a section of Chapter 41 Section 10 which reads:
 
"If there is a failure to elect or a vacancy occurs in the office of selectmen, the remaining selectmen or selectman may call a special election to fill the vacancy and shall call such election upon the request in writing of two hundred registered voters of the town, or twenty percent of the total number of registered voters of the town, whichever number is the lesser; provided, that such request if filed with them or him not less than one hundred days prior to the date of the next annual election." 
 
Boyle emphasized that the law states the request needs to be presented to "them," which refers to the Select Board. This was not done, he said. 
 
Collins worked with Thomas Irwin and several other supporting town members to gather signatures for his petition, which garnered 237 signatures. 
 
After being submitted to the town clerk on Oct. 16, the town clerk's office certified the signatures. 
 
On Oct. 17, Hunt said she informed board members that the petition had 223 certified signatures. 
 
Collins followed the proper procedure, Hunt said.
 
In Massachusetts, the proper procedure requires the petition to be returned to the clerk's office for certification of signatures so that the clerk can certify that the signers are Dalton residents and registered voters.
 
The petition has to be submitted to the clerk's office because they have the state computers which allow them to certify a citizens petition, she said. 
 
"I was surprised. I mean, those are pretty basic things, so I was a little shocked when I saw it this morning that those two, what I would have guessed to be clear to everybody wasn't, but I think they're clear on it now," Hunt said. 
 
In a follow-up, Collins expressed his disappointment with the board's decision, describing it as a "travesty" and the " impediment to democracy" he has seen in the town in a long time.
 
"What is it that that Select Board is trying to hide that they don't want anybody else new in their sandbox," Collins said. 

Tags: citizens petition,   special election,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Op-Ed: If Trump Really Wants to Help Working People He Won't Kill This Federal Agency

By U.S. Sen. Elizabeth WarrenGuest Column

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau was created to protect regular people from abusive banks and other businesses. Isn't that what Trump said he wants to do?

When a bunch of billionaires tell you they know what's best for you, hang onto your wallet. Over the past few weeks, Republican politicians and billionaires have come out swinging with lies about the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, hoping they can pave the way to "delete" the agency. But if you have a checking account, credit card, mortgage, or student loan, you might want to know what it could mean for you if the CFPB disappears. That's the dangerous promise of Project 2025.

Suppose you take out a car loan with Wells Fargo. Month after month you make your payments, but the bank messes up. Maybe they piled on fees you didn't owe or charged you the wrong interest rate. On their end, it looks like you've fallen behind on your payments, so they repossess your car. Now you can't get to work or take your kids to school. What are your options? You can't afford to sue. The police won't help. Before the CFPB, about all you could do was reach out to the bank's customer service and beg them to solve the problem, get left on hold, transferred from department to department, and end up nowhere. That was it — until the CFPB.

That's not a hypothetical. The CFPB received thousands of complaints that Wells Fargo had unlawfully repossessed cars and wrongfully foreclosed on homes. Wells Fargo illegally injured the owners of more than 16 million accounts — you may have been one of them. That's where the CFPB comes in. The agency took on the giant bank, stopped the repos, and ordered the bank to pay back more than $2 billion to those customers who had been wronged. No need to file a lawsuit. No need to spend hours on the phone. That's the power of having a cop on the beat.

While CEOs and right-wing think tanks like the Heritage Foundation try to get rid of the CFPB, it's worth remembering that the agency didn't appear out of thin air. The CFPB was created in 2010 in the aftermath of a huge cheating scandal that led to the 2008 housing crash. Shady lenders were tricking and trapping people with complicated mortgages that eventually crashed our economy and cost millions of people their homes. In "never again" mode, Congress created the CFPB as an independent agency with the power to stand up to giant corporations intent on cheating American consumers. Congress even funded the CFPB through the Federal Reserve to insulate it from everyday partisan politics. And it worked: The agency set standards so that people didn't get fooled, and those rules drove the seedy, fly-by-night companies out of our markets.

In the years since the mortgage crash, the CFPB has taken on aggressive junk fees that make price comparisons impossible. When servicemembers and veterans were being tricked into paying interest rates that surged up to 200 percent on pawn loans, the CFPB beat back the predators. And when it became clear that some medical debt collector companies were double billing patients or even charging patients for services they never received, the agency stepped up to try to right those wrongs.

Navient, one of the companies that doles out student loans, exploited students, lied to borrowers, overcharged service members, and conspired with fraudulent for-profit schools to trick students into taking on more loans they couldn't repay. In September, the CFPB delivered over $100 million in relief to Americans and permanently blocked Navient from the federal student loan system. Without the CFPB, Navient would probably still be cheating students.

The election made clear that working people want the government to unrig the economy. The CFPB is doing that work — and that's exactly why these billionaire CEOs don't want the agency around. When the CFPB stops a big bank from cheating you, that's one less chunk of change that goes into its pockets. These CEOs have made big political donations hoping to buy a Congress and a president who will "delete" the agency.

For years, when big banks would say "jump," too many politicians would ask, "How high?" Trump promised change. He pledged to cap credit card interest rates at 10 percent — it will take a strong CFPB to make that happen. He promised to rein in the influence of big tech — the CFPB is tackling that right now. He promised to make government work better for working people — the mission the CFPB delivers on every day.

Trump's first big decision on the CFPB will be to settle on a director — someone who will help the CEOs try to destroy the agency or someone who will keep the CFPB true to its mission to unrig the system. Will Trump decide to stand up to giant corporations to help the workers who voted for him or will he cower to the corporate billionaires? We should know soon.

This op-ed also ran in The Boston Globe on Dec.11, 2024. Warren helped create the CFPB before she was elected to Congress.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories