image description

Dalton Committee Works to Combat the Pines Trailhead Vandals

By Sabrina DammsiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story
DALTON, Mass. — Vandals have invaded the community forest that the Open Space and Recreation Committee has been trying to cultivate. 
 
Offensive images and words have been sprayed on rocks and tree trunks. 
 
Rejuvenating the Pines Trail, which starts behind the Senior Center, is the committee's first project since its establishment in March 2020. 
 
The committee was created following the update of the town's open space and recreation plan. Its goal is to protect the town's "treasured natural resources and parks and [maintain] its scenic beauty."
 
The Pines was the most natural choice for a first project. It is a hidden gem in the area that needs to be protected and more people should know about it, committee members have said. 
 
The committee portrayed the Pines as a beautiful, natural area with the potential to be a more widely used and appreciated resource to the community. 
 
Members highlighted its varied terrain and topography and the work they have been doing with the youth environment community organization Greenagers to make the trail Americans with Disabilities Act accessible. 
 
A $49,450 Mass Trails grant is being used to increase accessibility and complete various improvements, such as implementing a lookout area that will have benches. 
 
Upon entering this gem, visitors are instead greeted by graffiti that committee member Jenny Gitlitz described as obscene and unsightly. 
 
Who these mysterious tree vandals are is unknown, but Gitlitz recommended committee work to get youth more involved in the trail so they feel invested in the forest. This may deter them from painting the trees and rocks, she said.
 
The committee is developing ways to engage the community, hoping to attract new committee members and make the neighborhood feel invested in the trail. 
 
The committee will work with Department of Public Works Superintendent Edward "Bud" Hall on ways to remove or cover up the graffiti already on the trail. 
 
Committee member Cheryl Rose questioned how they could remove the graffiti and asked if spray painting the trees brown was an option.
 
"Not just with brown, because that's ugly," Gitlitz said. 
 
Instead, she would rather buy six neutral colors that mimic the shades found in trees to make it resemble the actual bark.
 
The committee said it would discuss whether there are any other options for removing the graffiti in the area. 
 
Once the issue is addressed, it will also navigate ways to prevent the vandals from marking up this scenic destination in the future.
 
Another concern they have been discussing is mitigating damage caused by all-terrain vehicles, dirt bikes, and snowmobiles. More information here
 
During a September meeting, committee members noted that the trails are easily accessible from High Street, and many ride on the trail from their homes.
 
"I want to be really careful about the approach," Rose said during the September meeting. 
 
She explained that she wants their approach to be friendly, soft and one that promotes a shared respect for the grounds.

 


Tags: graffiti,   vandalism,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Lanesborough Planners Bring STR, ADU, Signage Bylaws for Town Vote

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

LANESBOROUGH, Mass. — The Planning Board held a public hearing on the much anticipated bylaws for short-term rentals, accessory dwelling units, and signage to be presented at the annual town meeting.

For the past few months, planners have diligently been working on wordage of the new bylaws after Second Drop Farm's short-term rental was given a cease and desist because the building inspector said town bylaws don't support them.

The draft bylaw can be found on the website.

The board voted on each of the four articles and heard public comment before moving to entertain any amendments brought forward.

A lot of discussion in the STR section was around parking. Currently the drafted bylaw for parking states short-term rentals require two parking spaces, and with three or more bedrooms, require three spaces but never more than five.

There were questions about the reasons for limiting parking and how they will regulate parking renters choose to park on the lawn or the street. Planners said it is not their call, that is up to the property owner and if it is a public street that would be up to the authorities.

Some attendees called for tighter regulation to make sure neighborhoods are protected from overflow.

Lynn Terry said she lives next to one of the rented houses on Narragansett Avenue and does not feel safe with all of the cars that are parked there. She said there can be up to 10 at a time on the narrow road, and that some people have asked to use her driveway to park. She thinks limiting to five cars based on the house, is very important.

The wordage was amended to say a parking space for each bedroom of the house.

Rich Cohen brought up how his own STR at the Old Stone School helps bring in money and helps to preserve the historic landmark. He told the board he liked what they did and wants to see it pass at town meeting, knowing it might be revised later on.

He said the bylaws now should not be a "one size fits all" but may need to be adjusted to help protect neighborhoods and also preserve places like his.

After asking the audience of fewer than 20 people, the board decided to amend the amount of time an short-term rental can be reserved to 180 days total a year in a residential zone, and 365 days a year in every other zone. This was in the hopes the bylaw will be passed and help to deter companies from buying up properties to run STRs as well as protecting the neighborhood character and stability.

They also capped the stay limit of a guest to 31 days.

Cohen also asked them to add "if applicable" to the Certificate of Inspection rule as the state's rules might change and it can help stop confusion if they have incorrect requirement that the state doesn't need.

The ADU portion did not have much public comment but there were some minor amendments because of notes from KP Law, the town counsel.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories