Mass Loses $7M in Homeland Security Grants

Print Story | Email Story
BOSTON — The Trump administration has cut $6.9 million in public safety funding for Massachusetts communities. 
 
Gov. Maura Healey said the U.S. Department of Homeland Security notified the Executive Office of Public Safety and Security on Saturday that its previous award allocation of $22.2 million from the federal Homeland Security Grant Program is being reduced to just $15.3 million. 
 
This abrupt loss of nearly $7 million jeopardizes Massachusetts' ability to equip local emergency services and safeguard critical infrastructure against terrorist threats and other emergencies, she said.
 
"President Trump and [Homeland Security] Secretary Kristi Noem just made every community in Massachusetts and in states across the country less safe. Our cities and towns use this grant funding to keep their residents safe from threats and support law enforcement," Healey said. "President Trump is playing politics with our public safety, and he's using these funding cuts to punish those who disagree with him. He needs to restore the funding that we are owed."
 
Delivered without notice and only days before the end of the fiscal year, this sudden cut threatens to destabilize preparedness efforts statewide immediately, said the governor.
 
EOPSS administers homeland security grant funds through its Office of Grants and Research, which distributes them to the state's four Regional Homeland Security Advisory Councils, the Metro Boston Urban Area Security Initiative, and several state agencies.
 
Collectively, these partners provide the training, planning and critical resources that state and local stakeholders, as well as communities, need to respond to evolving threats, terrorist incidents and natural disasters, according to the governor's office. 
 
Healey said her administration stands with Attorney General Andrea Joy Campell, who on Tuesday joined a coalition of 12 attorneys general in filing an emergency lawsuit against the Trump administration's reallocation of federal homeland security funds. The lawsuit seeks to block politically motivated cuts that diverted lifesaving resources away from Massachusetts and other states, despite decades of bipartisan practice treating all states equitably in disaster preparedness. 
 
This sudden slash in funding undermines DHS's own stated priorities of strengthening emergency preparedness and enhancing community resilience by stripping resources from programs specifically designed to achieve those goals, according to state officials. The reductions will affect the Boston Regional Intelligence Center, which coordinates threat-related information sharing among local, state, federal, and private partners, as well as other competitive funds that support protective equipment, advanced training, and critical exercises such as Active Shooter Response. 
 
Past homeland security grants have supported investments including rapid deployment robots and situational awareness drones for fire services, mobile emergency operations equipment for the Massachusetts Emergency Management Agency, dive team gear for the State Police Marine Unit, and advanced training programs for Massport Fire Rescue. 
 
The administration calls for the immediate reinstatement of homeland security funds to ensure Massachusetts and its partners can continue to protect communities and ensure our collective ability to prepare for, respond to and recover from emerging threats.  

Tags: emergency preparedness,   federal grants,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Lanesborough Looks to Dissolve Baker Hill Road District

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

LANESBOROUGH, Mass. — The Select Board is looking to move forward with dissolving the Baker Hill Road District, which is hindering the Berkshire Mall sale.

On Friday, the Select Board heard from Vice Chair Juli Baker and Chair Deborah Maynard on how Tuesday negotiations went with Cypress Equities, JMJ Holdings, town counsel, the town administrator, and state Rep. John Barrett III. 

Baker said that during Tuesday's meeting, everyone agreed the goal was to have a successful sale of the mall for redevelopment as it’s in the best interest of the town.

Baker said Barrett assured them the state is willing to take the Connector Road and that the state is willing to provide grants to the town to renovate the water and sewer infrastructure, with an estimated total of $4.5 million, to facilitate the property's redevelopment.

"We have received assurances from Representative Barrett that the Commonwealth will provide the monies and will take the Connector," Baker said.

While buyer Cypress Equities saw some benefit in keeping the district, it now doesn't since the state is willing to provide the funds and renovate the infrastructure, according to Baker. 

Baker said that in the meeting, Cypress Equities prefers to enter into a tax increment financing (TIF) and will add to the agreement an amount of funding for public safety services, which would have come from the district. She said Cypress said it would rather enter into one agreement with the town than two agreements with the town and the district.

Mall owner JMJ Holdings is willing to pay $350,000 to the town upon closing, Baker said. 

The meeting Friday was to consider moving forward with a dissolution of the district.

"But the decision that it hinges on tonight is whether to move forward to the dissolution of the Baker Hill Road District in some manner," she said.

Baker said she has worked long and hard to see if there was another alternative to this, working closely with the district which has been "very cooperative and very helpful" in making changes.

The district had agreed to make changes to its governance and taxation; agreeing to have a cap for Cypress as well as agreeing to work to have the state take over the road, sending letters of support.

"What changed this for me is that I've always said it's important to have the special district because we get the public safety funding, and it's also important for the economic district to bring the features that an economic district brings because of what we're up against with the infrastructure problems, and the change at this point is that we have a buyer who is willing to supply that public safety money and commit to it over time, along with the TIF that the town would do, which is essential," she said.

"At this point, I feel like it's in the best interest of the town and protects the town the best in terms of a future where we can develop a mall and bring that economic benefit in. You definitely need to reduce taxes, and you cannot do that without a fully developed retail operation right there. So it's been, you know, deeply difficult decision making," Baker said.

Board members Jason Breault and Jeffery Walters agreed it was the best decision to move forward.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories