Mass Loses $7M in Homeland Security Grants

Print Story | Email Story
BOSTON — The Trump administration has cut $6.9 million in public safety funding for Massachusetts communities. 
 
Gov. Maura Healey said the U.S. Department of Homeland Security notified the Executive Office of Public Safety and Security on Saturday that its previous award allocation of $22.2 million from the federal Homeland Security Grant Program is being reduced to just $15.3 million. 
 
This abrupt loss of nearly $7 million jeopardizes Massachusetts' ability to equip local emergency services and safeguard critical infrastructure against terrorist threats and other emergencies, she said.
 
"President Trump and [Homeland Security] Secretary Kristi Noem just made every community in Massachusetts and in states across the country less safe. Our cities and towns use this grant funding to keep their residents safe from threats and support law enforcement," Healey said. "President Trump is playing politics with our public safety, and he's using these funding cuts to punish those who disagree with him. He needs to restore the funding that we are owed."
 
Delivered without notice and only days before the end of the fiscal year, this sudden cut threatens to destabilize preparedness efforts statewide immediately, said the governor.
 
EOPSS administers homeland security grant funds through its Office of Grants and Research, which distributes them to the state's four Regional Homeland Security Advisory Councils, the Metro Boston Urban Area Security Initiative, and several state agencies.
 
Collectively, these partners provide the training, planning and critical resources that state and local stakeholders, as well as communities, need to respond to evolving threats, terrorist incidents and natural disasters, according to the governor's office. 
 
Healey said her administration stands with Attorney General Andrea Joy Campell, who on Tuesday joined a coalition of 12 attorneys general in filing an emergency lawsuit against the Trump administration's reallocation of federal homeland security funds. The lawsuit seeks to block politically motivated cuts that diverted lifesaving resources away from Massachusetts and other states, despite decades of bipartisan practice treating all states equitably in disaster preparedness. 
 
This sudden slash in funding undermines DHS's own stated priorities of strengthening emergency preparedness and enhancing community resilience by stripping resources from programs specifically designed to achieve those goals, according to state officials. The reductions will affect the Boston Regional Intelligence Center, which coordinates threat-related information sharing among local, state, federal, and private partners, as well as other competitive funds that support protective equipment, advanced training, and critical exercises such as Active Shooter Response. 
 
Past homeland security grants have supported investments including rapid deployment robots and situational awareness drones for fire services, mobile emergency operations equipment for the Massachusetts Emergency Management Agency, dive team gear for the State Police Marine Unit, and advanced training programs for Massport Fire Rescue. 
 
The administration calls for the immediate reinstatement of homeland security funds to ensure Massachusetts and its partners can continue to protect communities and ensure our collective ability to prepare for, respond to and recover from emerging threats.  

Tags: emergency preparedness,   federal grants,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Dalton Board Signs Off on Land Sale Over Residents' Objections

By Sabrina DammsiBerkshires Staff

Residents demanded the right to speak but the agenda did not include public comment. Amy Musante holds a sign saying the town now as '$20,000 less for a police station.'
DALTON, Mass. — The Select Board signed the sale on the last of what had been known as the Bardin property Monday even as a handful of residents demanded the right to speak against the action. 
 
The quitclaim deed transfers the nine acres to Thomas and Esther Balardini, who purchased the two other parcels in Dalton. They were the third-highest bidders at $31,500. Despite this, the board awarded them the land in an effort to keep the property intact.
 
"It's going to be an ongoing battle but one I think that has to be fought [because of] the disregard for the taxpayers," said Dicken Crane, the high bidder at $51,510.
 
"If it was personal I would let it go, but this affects everyone and backing down is not in my nature." 
 
Crane had appealed to the board to accept his bid during two previous meetings. He and others opposed to accepting the lower bid say it cost the town $20,000. After the meeting, Crane said he will be filing a lawsuit and has a citizen's petition for the next town meeting with over 100 signatures. 
 
Three members of the board — Chair Robert Bishop Jr., John Boyle, and Marc Strout — attended the 10-minute meeting. Members Anthony Pagliarulo and Daniel Esko previously expressed their disapproval of the sale to the Balardinis. 
 
Pagliarulo voted against the sale but did sign the purchase-and-sale agreement earlier this month. His reasoning was the explanation by the town attorney during an executive session that, unlike procurement, where the board is required to accept the lowest bid for services, it does have some discretion when it comes to accepting bids in this instance.
 
View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories