Williamstown Bans SGAR Rodenticides on Town Property

By Stephen DravisiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story
WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass. — The town officials last week announced a policy restricting the use on town property of a type of rodenticide that has been linked to die-off of non-rodent wildlife.
 
According to the policy posted on the town's website, the use of "second-generation anticoagulant rodenticides," commonly known as SGARs on town property will be prohibited as of Dec. 1.
 
An emergency waiver allowing use of SGARS can be granted by the town manager in the event of, "a significant rodent infestation of public health consequence that has already exhausted all workable less-toxic integrated pest and rodent management practices."
 
Otherwise, the ban will apply to all buildings, grounds, parks and open spaces owned by the town, including Williamstown Elementary School, which is owned by Williamstown and leased to the Mount Greylock Regional School District.
 
On Thursday, Mount Greylock Superintendent Joseph Bergeron said the district already has a practice of not using SGARs, instead practicing integrated pest management, at all three of its schools: WES, Mount Greylock Regional School and Lanesborough Elementary.
 
The announcement of the policy by Town Hall follows a conversation that began in April at the Select Board, when resident Leslie Gura raised the issue.
 
At the time, Gura told the Select Board that there was legislation in Boston to ban the use of SGARs throughout the commonwealth and asked that the board take a first step by implementing a bylaw to end their use on town-owned properties.
 
The Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife advocates that all residents and building managers avoid the use of the SGAR class of rodent killers because the poison spreads from dead rats up the food chain with unintended consequences.
 
"Second-generation anticoagulant rodenticides (SGARs) prevent blood from clotting, causing fatal internal hemorrhage," the Fisheries and Wildlife website explains. "SGARs can poison wildlife in two ways: 1) primary poisoning when a non-targeted animal eats the bait and dies several days later, or 2) secondary poisoning when a predator or scavenger eats prey that has eaten the poisoned bait.
 
"Anticoagulants bioaccumulate, or build up over time, in animals that consume large quantities of rodents that have consumed these poisons. Secondary poisoning has been documented in birds of prey like eagles, hawks, and owls, as well as mammals like foxes, fishers, bobcats, and coyotes."
 
SGARs were shown to have caused the deaths of two bald eagles in the commonwealth in 2021 and to have contributed to the death of at least one other bald eagle in 2023, the state agency says.

Tags: pests,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

AG Clears Williamstown Select Board in Open Meeting Complaint

By Stephen DravisiBerkshires Staff
WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass. — The Attorney General's Office on Wednesday cleared the Select Board in an Open Meeting Law complaint filed by iBerkshires.com while simultaneously confirming the supposition at the heart of the complaint.
 
The AGO found that the board did technically violate the OML when it moved to executive session on May 11, a misstep the board previously acknowledged in its response to the complaint.
 
The meeting in question was held behind closed doors to discuss the town's response to a proposal from Williams College to acquire the former town garage site at 59 Water St.
 
At the time of the May 11 meeting, the board had held no public discussion, let alone a vote, on whether to enter into negotiations with Williams, the lone respondent to a request for proposals issued by the town for the 1.27-acre parcel.
 
The board cited an exception to the Open Meeting Law that states executive sessions are appropriate if, "holding the discussion in open session may have a detrimental effect on the Board's negotiating position."
 
iBerkshires.com maintained in its complaint that the executive session was premature given the fact that the board on May 11 had no one to negotiate with as it had not agreed — publicly — to negotiate with the college.
 
The news organization cited the fact that the town's RFP clearly indicated a multi-step process in which the board first would decide whether to engage with any of the respondents (assuming multiple bids were made) and then enter into negotiation with one of the respondents.
 
View Full Story

More Williamstown Stories