image description
The City Council voted to reject a special permit application for the drive-through.

Pittsfield Council Rejects Doughnut Drive-Through Permit

By Joe DurwinPittsfield Correspondent
Print Story | Email Story
The Plunkett School has been empty for years. A Dunkin' Donuts franchise has hoped to demolish the building and build a new doughnut shop with a drive-through.

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The City Council will move to reject plans for a Dunkin' Donuts drive-through at the corner of First and Fenn streets, following the continuation Tuesday of a lengthy public hearing on an issue that has sparked controversy in the community for more than a year.

By 10-0 vote, the council favored a motion to begin crafting a legal rejection of the special permit application for the drive-through proposal from Cafua Management. The company has planned to move its existing operation farther down First Street by demolishing the 104-year-old W.B. Plunkett School and building a new facility.
 
Several councilors cited concerns about anticipated traffic problems as well as a sense of overall inconsistency with the city's master plan among their reasons for opposing the special permit, which was also opposed by the city's Community Development Board in April.
 
"For the past 10 years, Pittsfield has aspired to be something better, and to do something better with its downtown," said Ward 6 Councilor John Krol.
 
Testimony from John Mullin, a longtime professor of urban planning brought in to offer additional consultation to the council at the invitation of the Department of Community Development, bolstered the councilors' concerns.
 
"This proposal is inconsistent with the city's vision in terms of this site," said Mullin, citing several points of consideration within master plan document, "The [proposed] property is inconsistent with protecting the character of the urban core, the project does not [contribute] to urban revitalization, it does not contribute to the desire for pedestrian movement along this urban core. The project will contribute minimally to the goal of well-paying core jobs, and the project will change the value of past character there."
 
Representatives of Cafua's proposal have maintained that no such inconsistency exists, and that the project will in fact enhance this corridor as a vibrant pedestrian environment.  
 
"I think there are some important benefits that have come out of this special permit process," said James Scalise of SK Design, who crafted the plan for the proposed facility with several nods to appeasing city concerns, including an outdoor lighting scheme to match that of the Common, and the incorporation of architectural features from the existing historic school building.
 
"No matter how you dress this up, this is a low-density, highway business activity within the urban core of your city," Mullin told the council.
 
Only Councilor at Large Barry Clairmont, who left before the final vote, voiced fervent support for the drive through proposal, saying opposition to the permit application would convey an image that Pittsfield is "anti-business."
 
"We'll be sending a clear message to the business community: 'Stay away.' Don't invest your money, because there is a really good chance we're going to shoot you down."
 
"This applicant is being a good neighbor," said Clairmont, pointing to the various concessions made by Cafua to make its proposal more palatable, and citing the importance of adding an anticipated five new jobs and additional property tax revenue for the city.
 
"Why did we do a master plan if we're not going to stick to it and use it?" countered Ward 2 Councilor Kevin Morandi.
 
Several councilors also expressed fears of traffic problems and pedestrian safety issues, despite a completed traffic study that concluded the proposed site would not have a significant adverse effect.
 
"I realize the conclusion of the traffic study is that it won't create problems, but if you drill down deeper into the data, it does point to periods of gridlock," said Ward 5 Councilor Jonathan Lothrop. "The purpose of planning is to prevent that."
 
With the possibility of litigation by Cafua Management looming since the beginning of the council's hearing on the issue last month, councilors conferred extensively with Mark Brobowski, a Concord-based attorney specializing in land use and zoning law, on the criteria for their decision and procedures for crafting a response to the doughnut franchisee's application.
 
"No one is entitled to a special permit," Brobowski told the council, indicating that it is the council's job as the permitting authority in this case to decide upon the merits of the application, and a judge is unlikely to overturn the decision as long as it is found to have been fairly debated. "You're the last word here, and your discretion is very broad and very deep."
 
Brobowski said an ideal letter of denial may go through several drafts before being sent out to the applicant. The council has 90 days from the close of the public hearing Tuesday night to issue its letter of denial.
 
Following the vote to issue a denial, representatives of Cafua did not elect to comment on the council's decision or future plans for pursuing the special permit.

Tags: city council,   drive-through,   Dunkin Donuts,   historical building,   school building,   special permit,   vacant building,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

BRTA Hears From New ITS System to Help With Rides

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Berkshire Regional Transit Authority heard from an "intelligent transportation system" company on what it can bring to the bus service.

Spare Labs presented to the board last week, showcasing its platform for demand-response services, fixed-route information, service planning, and rider engagement. 

Spare representatives said the company has been working with transit authorities across the state and hope to "de-risk" the service with software changes.

"We know how tough it is to make a software change. It's no small feat. We've done it quite a few times in the states, so you're now working off of a blank piece of paper. We understand what your partners have done, positives and negatives, so you're building with that in mind," said senior growth manager Joshua Bethel.

Bethel emphasized a hands-on implementation where they will work with BRTA staff to prepare data, test the system, train dispatchers, drivers, and administrators, and help with rider communications.

"One example of how we've de-risked is the MBTA, one of the largest paratransit services [The Ride] in North America. In their switch to Spare, they saw immediate results. So our kind of implementation process is extremely white glove," he said. "We like to get in the trenches. We like to be with you on site, opening up a lot of times. We're here 4 a.m. when the days open, working with you. So look at this as an active partnership." 

Bethel gave an example on how the system helped the Massachusetts Bay Transit Authority with a training approach.

"Internally, every stakeholder will have some type of training, whether it's a dispatcher, a driver, admins. You all will have some level of training and different permissions in the system. Because of that approach, MBTA saw immediate great results," he said. "Their on-time performance pre-spare was 88 percent. Within 24 hours of launch, they were up to 95 percent, and they are continuing to grow."

Spare described several ways riders could interact with the system — a BRTA-branded smartphone app, online booking through a web portal, phone booking with a human dispatcher, text-based interactions, and an AI phone agent for routine requests, such as booking, canceling, or checking the status of a trip.

"One of the biggest differences that riders will see is everything will truly be at their fingertips, and we have multiple ways we're going to stay up to date based on what's available to them, we obviously will have a router app on the smartphone, but we offer availabilities for people who don't have that," Bethel said. "So, for someone who doesn't have a smartphone but they have access to a computer, we have a webbooker. For someone who doesn't have access to a computer but they need to call in, we also will be teaming what you have from a dispatcher standpoint. We also offer an AI call taker who can answer frequently asked questions, and when wait time is too hard, too high, automatically clicks in and says, 'Hey, this is the final wait time. You can call, you can cancel.' So effectively, with the technology, you can reduce wait times as you grow."

Their platform could also account for rider accessibility needs when matching trips to vehicles and could flag cases where a rider's booking did not reflect their usual needs. It can also have caregivers and others book on a rider's behalf if need be for medical appointments and more.

Earlier in the meeting, BRTA Deputy Manager Benjamin Hansen spoke on the ridership numbers citing inaccurate data on how many are riding because of the outdated system. Their system will be able to know in real time when a passenger boards and when one gets off. 

Spare also described tools intended to support route and demand-response planning, including; reporting by route, stop, time of day, and rider; integrations with passenger counting hardware and other systems; real-time vehicle and trip information; traffic-aware routing, which could use Google traffic data; and alerts for unusual patterns or apparent data discrepancies.

They said data could be brought into the platform from existing hardware and configured into reports for BRTA. The Spare team would work with BRTA during implementation to decide which data to import and which measures the agency needs. 

Many of the questions posed by the board were about the selling of data and how rider data is protected. Spare representatives said the company does not sell rider data and that BRTA would control the permissions as the data would belong to BRTA. As for a government agency asking for the data, they were unsure and said they would have to verify the rules for sharing information, but added they are compliant with the Americans With Disabilities Act and federal and state law. 

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories