image description
Kimberley Grady, then the interim superintendent of the Mount Greylock Regional School District, interviews for the full-time position in April 2018.

Mount Greylock Superintendent Grady Steps Down

By Stephen DravisiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass. — Mount Greylock Regional School Superintendent Kimberley Grady has tendered her resignation.

In an email sent to the Lanesborough-Williamstown district's community on Saturday afternoon, Grady confirmed what had been implied by an agenda item posted for a special School Committee meeting on Monday morning: She is leaving the district after 10 years as an administrator.

Grady said she was proud of the accomplishments of her administrative team and cited her health as one reason for her decision to leave.

"[O]ver the past two plus years the job of Superintendent was more than just running the schools within the District," Grady wrote in an email forwarded to the community by the district's director of operations at 3:25 p.m.

Last week, the School Committee appointed Robert Putnam to serve as the district's interim superintendent while Grady was on medical leave.

The last public meeting attended by Grady in her capacity as superintendent was a meeting of the district's Parent Advisory Council on June 24. iBerkshires.com learned that on Friday, June 26, then Assistant Superintendent Andrea Wadsworth informed district personnel that she would serve as acting superintendent while Grady was "unavailable."

On July 1, the School Committee held the fourth of four closed-door meetings in a month's time to "conduct strategy sessions in preparations for negotiations with non-union personnel (Superintendent)."

Five days later, the School Committee appointed Putnam on an interim basis.

A question to School Committee Chair Christina Conry about when the committee received Grady's letter of resignation was not immediately answered.


Grady's email to the community did not elaborate on what she meant by "more than just running the schools within the district." Nor did she give details on the health concerns that kept her out of her office the last two weeks.

She did, however, recognize the turbulence facing all school districts in the commonwealth as they prepare to reopen in September after closing the doors for in-person classes in March because of the COVID-19 pandemic.

"Although, this does not seem like the right time to step down with all of the uncertainties of the fall reopening, the time has come for me to step down and attend to my health," Grady wrote.

Grady has served as the director of pupil services for the Tri-District (the shared services agreement that preceded the full regionalization of the Mount Greylock District in 2017), assistant superintendent, acting superintendent, interim superintendent and, since spring 2018, full-time superintendent.

In her Saturday afternoon email to faculty, staff, students and families, Grady talked about her time as the district's chief executive officer.

"I have had the pleasure of working at MGRSD since 2010," she wrote. "During my tenure, I worked with several Superintendents, Business Managers and School Committee members.

"My administrative team and I have worked together to get through many new initiatives as well as obstacles. I am proud of the work we have accomplished.

"We have had great successes. Among other things, we created new programming, maintained DESE compliance, fully regionalized, negotiated contracts, developed a strategic plan, started community conversations on racism, managed COVID-19 closure with remote learning plans and worked hard on the building project, with still some lingering pieces for closeout."


Tags: MGRSD,   resignation,   superintendent,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Williamstown Community Preservation Panel Weighs Hike in Tax Surcharge

By Stephen DravisiBerkshires Staff
WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass. — The Community Preservation Committee is considering whether to ask town meeting to increase the property tax surcharge that property owners currently pay under the provisions of the Community Preservation Act.
 
Members of the committee have argued that by raising the surcharge to the maximum allowed under the CPA, the town would be eligible for significantly more "matching" funds from the commonwealth to support CPA-eligible projects in community housing, historic preservation and open space and recreation.
 
When the town adopted the provisions of the CPA in 2002 and ever since, it set the surcharge at 2 percent of a property's tax with $100,000 of the property's valuation exempted.
 
For example, the median-priced single-family home in the current fiscal year has a value of $453,500 and a tax bill of $6,440, before factoring the assessment from the fire district, a separate taxing authority.
 
For the purposes of the CPA, that same median-priced home would be valued at $353,500, and its theoretical tax bill would be $5,020.
 
That home's CPA surcharge would be about $100 (2 percent of $5,020).
 
If the CPA surcharge was 3 percent in FY26, that median-priced home's surcharge would be about $151 (3 percent of $5,020).
 
View Full Story

More Williamstown Stories