Lanesborough Public Safety Committee May Offer Three Facility Proposals

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — Based on public feedback, the Public Safety Building Committee is looking to offer residents three possible scenarios for a new facility.

These include just a police station, a combined police and emergency medical services complex, and a complete facility with police, EMS, and the Fire Department.

Chair Mark Siegars has doubts about the addition of the Fire Department into the proposals, as the town rejected a $6 million police and EMS proposal earlier this year and adding fire would significantly increase the cost, but residents have expressed an interest in it.

He pointed to other Berkshire County communities such as Williamstown, which is building a more than $22 million fire station.

"I'm not going to go on record pushing a $30 million or $40 million building. That is not the need that I was asked to address. That came out in the community survey," he said last week, adding that it is worth getting a cost estimate to inform residents.

The committee is in its third month of work after the former Police Station Committee was dissolved.  The new panel is charged with producing a proposal that resonates with residents and meets the town's needs.

Last month, the panel received over 250 responses to a community survey. Of those, 161 responses indicated interest in a complex with all three public safety departments, 139 in just a police station, and 124 in a police and ambulance facility.

Members also sent project designer Brian Humes a list of questions to review at this meeting.

One of the questions read: Is there a connection between the building design and the level of public service delivered to the community?

Humes reported that some community members question why they need a facility at all if public safety officials are in the streets to provide service, which he said is based on ignorance.

"As public service providers, Police and EMS professionals deserve a facility that can support their efforts in training, professional development, chain of custody, handling and transport of detainees,


confidentiality, record keeping, and storage and handling of equipment. Making a better professional [sic]
has a direct impact on their ability to provide the services that are asked of them by the community," he wrote.

"Seeking professional accreditation that can be recognized on a state or national level should be a goal of every department to share with their community. The building that they work in can directly assist
them, or deter them, in that effort."

Committee member Eric Harrington observed that it is clear Humes stands behind his building proposal and the earlier needs assessment.

It was also pointed out that the panel's job is to make a recommendation that will best serve the community and it should be presented to residents by the Select Board, as they are public officials.

"I think what we're going to end up coming out of this committee is a report with a recommendation," Siegars said.

"It's only going to be five or six pages long and it's going to have a basic discussion about what the facility is, the size of the facility, what services that we provide, what the annual costs to typical taxpayer will be."

EMS Director Jen Weber said it is important for the fire chief to be at the table when discussing a possible police, EMS, and fire proposal.

"The whole time, you have talked about three different departments but you only have two department heads sitting here," she said.

"You at no point have brought the fire chief into this conversation and that may change your conversation. I know as a department that if we're having this conversation about moving our facility without being involved in it, it wouldn't sit well."

It was also clarified that the wish is to have an informal inspection of the Fire Department to get a rough cost estimate and that additional outreach will be needed to inform residents.


Tags: Lanesborough Police Station,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Pittsfield: Should Park Square Be an Historic District?

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The committee drafting a proposed local historic district around Park Square wants to generate interest and participation in the process. 

Members launched the charge during meetings in August and September. A survey and public hearing are planned to gather feedback early on. 

City Planner Kevin Rayner explained they are not just doing this out of a love for historic buildings, but for the timeless sense of place you get when you step into Park Square, which was laid out over 200 years ago and hosted the first-ever agricultural fair in 1810. 

"I think that the main thing that we need to kind of park on is that this is the heart of our community, and it really sets the stage for the sense of place in Pittsfield, and any change to that should have some review and some consensus from folks who have a passion for protecting the history and that character of Pittsfield," he said to the new Local Historic District Study Committee last week. 

"And there's that private property versus historic resource thing, but I’d say that a lot of these buildings on the square belong to the soul of Pittsfield here, and deserve to be protected, and I don't think that the layer of regulation that we're throwing down here is going to be unreasonable or a real boundary." 

In March, the City Council voted to amend the City Code, Chapter 2, to establish the study committee.

Pittsfield has more than 20 locations on the National Register of Historic Places, including the Park Square Historical District, but the designation just allows communities to apply for federal tax credits and doesn't impose restrictions on buildings. The central area was laid out a few decades after Pittsfield was given a town charter in 1761.

A district can be one building, several buildings, or an area. Historic restrictions only apply to the exterior of buildings; the committee has authority to say a building in the district cannot be demolished. 

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories