image description

Pittsfield's Park Square Eyed for Historic District

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — Could Pittsfield have a historic district? A local panel will explore the idea.

On Monday, the Historical Commission agreed to start the long and winding road that could lead to designating Park Square (or other properties) as a historical district, which preserves and protects buildings and places with historical significance.  

The commission will gather additional information about the designation and possibly invite a presenter to explore it at a future meeting.

"We have to really think about this," City Planner Kevin Rayner said.

"…There's a long, windy road in front of us here to do this, but I think for some of these districts, it would be worthwhile to do so, and I was surprised to see that there weren't any local historic districts in Pittsfield, to be quite honest."

The city has more than 20 locations on the National Register of Historic Places, including the Park Square Historical District, but the designation just allows communities to apply for federal tax credits and doesn't impose restrictions on buildings.

The district could be one building, several buildings, or an area. Historic restrictions only apply to the exterior of buildings.

Rayner doesn't think anyone would argue against Park Square being a historic district. The area was laid out just a few decades after Pittsfield was given a town charter in 1761 and was the site of the first agricultural fair in 1810.

"There are some that would make more sense than others, and I think that Park Square could be a good test case for this," he said.

A report would have to be made, such as a Form A or Form B, and the historic district would go through the Massachusetts Historical Commission and Community Development Board before going to the City Council for a vote. The city planner imagines that it would also require some ordinance changes to guide the criteria and process.

Chair John Dickson recognized that Pittsfield has a number of properties on the national registry, which is more "honorific."

"The local historic district is an entity with teeth," he said. "It sets up a separate committee that reviews any different changes to the buildings and has to approve them, I believe."


He pointed out that the commission's endangered property casebook, local historic districts were recommended for the Park Square area and the Wyandotte Mill complex, and "they suggested that we could establish single building local historic districts for 16 other properties," though that seems a little out of their bandwidth.

Dickson thinks it is worth continuing the discussion, knowing it is a long process, and thinks Park Square is an easy one to do. He also recommended a single building district for the William Russell Allen house on East Street.

"It's pretty much entirely exterior, but it also prevents demolition," Rayner added.

"So if there's a building that the historic commission really wants to protect, you could put it in a local historic district, and if it comes to the historic commission for approval for demolition, then the historic commission can say ‘no.'"

Commissioner William Garrison recognized that there would be "a lot of political pieces," with people thinking that the city would tell them what color a building can be painted.

"I know Park Square might be exempt from some of that, but it would be a tough fight, as I predict," he said. "Not saying it's not worth fighting."

While fully in support of historic preservation, Commissioner Jeffry Bradway wondered if creating a historic district with restrictions might affect people's willingness to invest in city buildings.

It is imagined that there would be wiggle room within the regulations to foster preservation.

"It's basically just the commission stewarding that area and just controlling what kind of happens to those buildings," Rayner said.

"I think you're right. It might inhibit some development, but I don't think it's going to be like a hard wall. I think the commission can kind of talk to people and talk to the developer and really find the middle ground that works for both sides."

Earlier in the meeting, the commission discussed bringing light to endangered historical buildings through media profiles. The panel also discussed the concept of sponsoring Community Preservation Act funding applications for the properties.
 


Tags: historic district,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Lanesborough Select Board Tables JMJ Negotiations

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

LANESBOROUGH, Mass. — Tensions swirled at Monday's Select Board meeting in light of conversations to dissolve the Baker Hill Road District.

The meeting started with public comment, including from Tim Grogan, development consultant for JMJ RE Holdings, who emphasized that without a dissolution of the road district, the potential sale and redevelopment with the mall would fall through. 

He said the town expects about $760,000 in fiscal 2027 from the road district plus normal taxation. With redevelopment and no district, total income is projected to be around $1.1 million by 2029, he said, implying about a $300,000 annual surplus versus the status quo. He said he provided those calculations to the board.

Keeping the road district alive is not a compromise, Grogan said, referring to a proposal floated by the board last week to facilitate the mall's sale and work with the road district to reduce its tax assessment.

"This mentality by previous select boards and the Baker Hill Road District is what led the property to its current condition," he said. "Further, the Baker Hill Road District has every motive to make this compromise work, as their alternative is dissolution and non-existence. This practice is inherently in bad shape, and JMJ will not entertain any circumstance where the Baker Hill Road District continues to exist. 

"JMJ is inclined and trying to be treated like any other business in the town, and taxes such just like every other major shopping center in the state, keeping the Baker Hill Road District in place will continue to discourage redevelopment, and in this moment will break the delicate balance that has been negotiated between JMJ, Lanesborough, and [buyer Cypress Equities] to the point where the project is no longer feasible, and the only choice is litigation." 

Lyndon Moors, chair of the Finance Committee and recent appointee to the district's Prudential Committee, spoke personally in favor of keeping the district. He said it currently provides more than $500,000 per year to the town, which helps fund two police officers, fire and police vehicles, and over $100,000 per year for the Department of Public Works. He said losing that revenue could significantly impact town services and future budgets, especially as free cash may be lower going into FY28. 

He suggests downsizing the district's budget to reduce the tax burden on the mall and Target, which owns its building separately, while still maintaining revenue for the town. The board should let the litigation play out and not be too hasty in making decisions, he said.

"I think it is unlikely that we will see $1.1 million from the mall property without Baker Hill Road District in FY29. That's what I just heard. We are in FY27 right now. I think that's very unlikely two fiscal years from now, that we are enjoying the tax benefits to the tune of $1.1 million. So I would encourage the Select Board to put on the brakes a little bit, continue to be thoughtful, responsive, deliberative, and let's continue to do what's best for the town," Moors said.

Moors mentioned a Facebook post posted by Blake Mensing, one of the owners of JMJ, on the town group with documents that could be relevant to the meeting, saying it looked as though he was trying to negotiate in public. Mensing said it was an exercise of his First Amendment rights and an attempt to provide transparency to residents, especially since JMJ's opportunity to speak is limited to public comment.

Vice Chair Julie Baker suggested the compromise, said she and board member Michael Murphy have had "very robust and constructive discussions with the district."

"The purpose of it was to see if we could work with them to lessen the special tax burden that the district imposes on the owners, all owners of the mall properties, and while keeping the special tax district in place to preserve the police, fire, police car, and road maintenance services that we received from that special taxation," she said. 

Baker said the district is also interested in giving the road to the state, if the state allows. They also reviewed the district's $800,000 budget and discussed reductions but have not made concrete decisions.

"We find a great deal of interest in helping cut the budget there so that it would reduce the tax burden as well," she said. "So we're not ready with specific numbers yet on that, but there's certainly the willingness to make some major cuts into that budget."

Chair Deborah Maynard said she wants to dissolve the BHRD and that she would not want them to go ahead with the discussions.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories