image description
Interim Superintendent Latifah Phillips, center, attends her first School Building Needs Commission as co-chair.

Pittsfield School Building Commission Welcomes New Superintendent

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

PITTSFIELD, Mass.— The academic year has begun with a new superintendent of the Pittsfield Public Schools and the same focus on a couple of big projects. 

Interim Superintendent Latifah Phillips was appointed as co-chair of the School Building Needs Commission on Tuesday, and commissioners looked to the future of the Crosby/Conte proposal. 

Phillips stepped into the position on July 1 and has since met with the Massachusetts School Building Authority to discuss enrollment numbers. 

"That is ongoing work. We intend to finalize the enrollment numbers at the end of October," she reported. 

"And it was shared with us that once that number is finalized, that is the number for the next couple of decades, so it's really critical that number is done properly so that we can build a building that is right-sized for the community." 

In June, the City Council supported borrowing up to $2 million for a feasibility study that gauges the possibility of rebuilding Silvio O. Conte Community School and John C. Crosby Elementary on the West Street site with shared facilities.

The study, estimated to cost about $1.5 million, is a part of the 80 percent reimbursable costs from the MSBA, which accepted the project into its queue late last year.

When the project was proposed, officials and community members toured the approximately 69,000-square-foot schools that are more than 50 years old. Crosby, built as a middle school, has cracked windows that were repaired with duct tape, and Conte is an open-concept school that doesn't align with modern safety and educational needs.



Phillips shared that she experienced the building of a new school facility while working as a chief of staff in San Jose, Calif.  She reported that there was a lot of bond campaigning for the community funding match. 

"So that was a lot of my role was making sure that the community was informed about the intention of the building, the opportunity for the community in the building," she said. 

"And then once the building was being built, making sure that it was it was meeting the needs of the community." 

She recalled that community feedback was quiet until bulldozers broke ground, and nearby residents were concerned about views being obstructed. This underscored the importance of communicating openly and frequently during a project, she explained. 

The commission also discussed revising its charter, which must be approved by the mayor and City Council. Co-Chair Frank LaRagione explained that the new draft ordinance trims membership down to 15 five-year seats. 

"I think the toughest part we're going to have is to go from, I think it's 21 that we have right now, to 15 after this, if that's what we decide," he said. 

Running parallel to this effort is a restructuring of the middle schools. 

At Phillips' first School Committee meeting with the district, it voted to create an upper elementary school for Grades 5-6 and a junior high school for Grades 7-8 by the 2026-2027 academic year. A stipulation was added that if goals in the Middle School Restructuring Committee's timeline are not met by the December meeting, it will be delayed one year. 

Later that month, the committee decided that Herberg will house Grades 5-6 and Reid will be home to Grades 7-8 when the middle schools restructure.


Tags: Pittsfield Public Schools,   school building committee,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Letter: Board Balance Needed on Dalton Public Safety Advisory Committee

Letter to the Editor

To the Editor:

I share Dave Martindale's concerns about appointing individuals with actual or perceived conflicts of interest to the newly formed Public Safety Facility Advisory Committee leadership. Several committee members either represent departments that would occupy and directly benefit from the proposed facility or have personal connections to those individuals, raising concerns about the committee's ability to impartially balance a best-in-class facility against a cost-conscious solution.

While their perspectives are valuable, the committee would benefit from a more balanced membership that includes independent residents focused on affordability, long-term planning, and the town's broader financial obligations.

I support the town's decision to explore a combined public safety facility. However, the police station needs assessment should be revisited before the town advances a specific plan. The assessment projects a 32 percent increase in total call volume and a 68 percent increase in staffing by 2045. Those projections are unrealistic based on historical call volume, crime statistics trends and the town's financial outlook — particularly when future budget constraints may require staffing reductions.

The town has already invested considerable time and money pursuing a standalone police station after previously rejecting a combined facility. Now that a joint facility is again under consideration, residents deserve a transparent process based on realistic projections and a cost-conscious evaluation of the town's actual needs.

The town manager and Select Board should consider adding neutral community members to the committee and designating the police chief and interim fire chief as non-voting advisers. They should also revise the needs assessment using supportable staffing, call volume, and population assumptions. A public safety facility is a significant long-term investment, and the town should ensure that the final proposal balances public safety needs with fiscal responsibility.

Amy Lennin
Dalton, Mass.

 

 

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories