Dalton Pushes for Capital Funding in Charter Contract

By Sabrina DammsiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story
DALTON, Mass. — The Cable Advisory Commission presented its pressing needs for local cable access to a Charter Communications representative, with hopes they will be included in the cable company's draft license.
 
The town's attorney on the issue, William Solomon, advocated for negotiating on the biggest issues first, specifically capital funding, but noted that there has been an impasse for other towns for which he has negotiated contracts.
 
"Nowadays, I think they're telling people they don't give any capital," Solomon said before the presentation portion of the meeting.
 
The commission presented its 13-page cable ascertainment to Nancy Clark, Charter Communications director of government affairs, during its meeting on Monday. Clark participated via Zoom. 
 
The station manager Michael Sinopoli collaborated with consultant Eric Dresser to produce the document, which goes into detail about the station's mission and vision, examples of current programming, one-year metrics, strategic priorities, letters of support, needs, and challenges.
 
More on the station's needs here
 
The town expects that some compromises are possible on various sections. However, Solomon recommended that Charter first respond with its perspective on addressing the major issues. Once those are discussed, Charter can introduce additional topics as it sees fit, allowing for a more focused and productive negotiation process, he said.
 
"I think you and I have had a number of conversations about the approach for licenses in a number of towns, and as I have said to you before, Charter is not going to negotiate details of a license without a document," Clark said.
 
Solomon asked Clark how she would like to conduct the negotiations, saying that developing a 50-page license only to find out that Charter is not willing to give the town capital is a waste of time.
 
"[What Charter is willing to give for capital is] good to know, because then we can spend our time on a different track," he said.
 
Prior to answering Solomon's question, Clark said she had allocated an hour to the meeting and but would be happy to reconvene with the group.
 
"I am not going to have a lengthy debate with you about the ..." she began, but Solomon interjected, clarifying that he wasn't looking for a debate — just a brief answer about her preferred negotiation approach.
 
Clark said she has enough information to put together a draft license. Solomon asked if the draft license will have numbers, video return, and other information.
 
"The draft license will have the details in it as I am able to provide them," Clark responded.
 
Solomon questioned whether these details are just going to be the substance and legalese, he said, adding that he believes these are not unfair questions following a brief silence.
 
"They are unfair questions, because you know exactly what a Charter Communications cable license looks like," she said, as Solomon interrupted her to say, "I don't, you tell me. I'm listening. You keep on talking in circles. Tell us what it is."
 
 
"And you know that," she said, thanking the commission for the meeting before signing off.
 
The station has been operating in Dalton for more than four decades, broadcasting on topics including public interest, education, local news, and local sports. The last time the town had a contract was in 1997 with Time Warner Cable, which was purchased in 2016 by Spectrum, which is owned by Charter.
 
The station has grown but its outdated equipment has restricted its capabilities. That includes slow internet speeds, operating on old analog equipment, inability to broadcast in high-definition, and limited streaming options.
 
The committee hopes to negotiate a 10-year license contract which would include PEG (Public, Educational, and Governmental) capital, capital contributions, franchise fees, connections, and other items to be negotiated to help meet cable association's needs.

Tags: cable television,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Fenton: Governor's Council Must Deliver for the Berkshires

Community submissionGuest Column
I am a Springfield lawyer running for Governor's Council and I am asking for Berkshire County residents to support me over an incumbent from North Adams. 
 
Here's why: Last year I learned about staffing issues in our regional courts that I could not ignore. In 2025, it was reported that four of Western Massachusetts' 11 Superior Court judgeships were vacant, all at the same time. A few weeks later, that grew to five vacancies. This meant there were only six Superior Court judges serving all of Western Mass at a time when Berkshire, Hampshire, Franklin, and Hampden counties had more than 100 pending homicide cases. 
 
Those numbers were alarming to me, so I started to engage with leaders in the community who work most closely with the court system and I came to learn that these vacancies were only the tip of the iceberg here in Berkshire County.
 
I learned that no Superior Court or District Court judge had been appointed from the Berkshires since the current incumbent took office. As a result, there is not a single Superior Court judge who lives in the Berkshires today, and several of the District Court judges drive in from other counties to support Berkshire courts in Pittsfield, Great Barrington, and North Adams. Court staff also informed me about severe staffing shortages at the Berkshire Clerk of Courts office resulting in other counties needing to loan staff to the Berkshires just so hardworking employees can take a brief and planned summer vacation. This is not normal. These issues are a reflection of genuine problems with the Berkshire County court system and show a lack of proactive attention from our Governor's Councilor.
 
Instead of focusing on regional equity, I watched as the current incumbent celebrated that she has voted against the governor's nominees more than any other councilor, without much explanation as to why. Most recently, she voted against two extremely qualified former prosecutors for the Parole Board. This was despite an in-person plea from the governor and a letter of support from all the three of the district attorney's from Western Mass. Those votes do not show independence or standing up for principles, they demonstrate naivete, and an unwillingness to work with the key stakeholders.
 
I had seen and heard enough. I decided to jump in the race and challenge the incumbent to address these problems head-on.
 
I am a partner of a regional law firm. I understand our courts and the importance of having qualified, fair and hardworking judges. And I know how important it is to have judges from the Berkshires serving the Berkshires. To achieve that, you need strong relationships with the legal community and local stakeholders. You need to know how to use the power of the Governor's Council to fight forcefully for our region. And you need to be laser focused on identifying vacancies before they occur so that they can be filled quickly with local candidates.
 
View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories