image description
The new creative district covers North and South Street.

Pittsfield City Council Ordains Downtown Creative District Zoning

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — Downtown Pittsfield will now be zoned as a creative district after the City Council's Tuesday vote.

The council ordained a zoning amendment for a Downtown Creative District in a 9-1 vote with Ward 1 Councilor Helen Moon opposed and Ward 6 Councilor Dina Guiel Lampiasi absent. North Street and South Street will be the primary areas affected by this change.

The new zoning district will replace the Downtown Arts Overlay District adopted in 2004 and the more traditional historic zoning districts that are within the downtown area.

"This downtown arts overlay district was adopted at a time when we were trying to understand the roadblocks for development, redevelopment, especially some of the successful mixed-use development we've seen downtown, and it was it was a good balance of trying to allow a lot more flexibility with use and reuse of space but also providing some protections, especially to guard against your more suburban-style developments that didn't necessarily mesh into the downtown area," City Planner CJ Hoss briefly explained as he had presented this project to around four different panels already.

"What we've seen since 2004, is it did all those things really well. But it got to the point where most projects in the Downtown Arts Overlay District require a special permit through the Community Development Board. For most development downtown. I think what we've seen is it's really not necessary, most projects are a positive influence on the types of revitalization. We have been hoping to see downtown."

Moon first motioned to remove the zoning amendment's section that allows housing developers to file for a special permit to be exempt from the 20 percent affordable housing unit requirement.  When developers apply for the special permit, there's an intention that they will make a reasonable contribution to the Affordable Housing Trust that is expected to exist by the end of the year.

The council rejected this motion and Councilor at Large Earl Persip lll motioned to allow developers to donate to entities other than the Affordable Housing Trust in order to be exempt from the 20 percent affordable housing unit standard. This passed 8-2 with Moon and Morandi voting in opposition.

Theoretically, the developer could get a waiver to not build the affordable housing units, and also not contribute to the Affordable Housing Trust and or the alternative.

Moon raised concern over equity within the prioritization of market-rate and affordable housing units.

"When I think about the projects that have come to fruition in the past decade or more, none of these projects have included affordable housing units, to my knowledge that I can think of off the top of my head and so I'm trying to juxtapose this against where we are currently with our housing situation, and, and I know, in the past decade, there's been a big push for market-rate housing because of General Dynamics, and BMC, and so on and so forth but we do also have a low-income housing crisis in Pittsfield," she said.

"I feel like we just have a waiver at this time and there's no mechanism for if there is a true need to not if there's a true need, that they cannot afford and they cannot make the finances of a development work based on building 20 percent of the affordable housing criteria there isn't an alternative for them to do anything else, they're just getting a pass at this time because we have this waiver available."


Director of Community Development Deanna Ruffer said Moon's sentiments are not true, referencing the $15.5 million overhaul of the Rice Silk Mill completed in 2012 and the $10 million New Amsterdam Apartment project completed in 2009.

Ruffer said Moon has not heard about affordable housing unit progression because the projects don't come before the council as they are typically getting state tax incentives.

"You're comparing apples to oranges," she added.

Moon asserted that she was not instigating a debate on the topic, but has observed a higher amount of market-rate housing projects in her time as a councilor.

"I am not saying that you are not trying to create affordable housing, I will say though, that as a city councilor, what does come before me and what I have paid attention to are market-rate projects because they're being incentivized with city-funded tax breaks, through TIEs (Tax Increment Exemption) and TIFs (Tax Increment Financing,) and sometimes GE economic development funds," she said.

"And I think that that is kind of a pre-emptive because we don't have an affordable housing spec yet. I would further argue that I think that that contribution or reasonable contribution that's required needs to be a calculated amount, instead of what the Community Development Board reserves, it's very unclear as to how much that looks like."

Hoss said it would be favorable to address inclusionary housing outside of this zoning ordinance, but the city is just "not there yet."  That being said, he explained that it is important not to lose the carryover procedures that are in place in the meantime.

He added that there is not an affordable housing requirement for development on Tyler Street but newly approved Reigning Love Church development at 235 East St. includes affordable housing units.

"We are committed to doing this," Hoss said in regard to establishing an affordable housing trust. "We've already applied for technical assistance, twice actually to help with this, this is something that is one of our priorities to see this through. I mean, we all want to make this work. I know that might not totally console you, as far as if you see that as a concern. but we are committed to seeing this through."
 


Tags: creative district,   Downtown Pittsfield,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Pittsfield Invited to 'Senior Study' with MSBA

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Pittsfield Public Schools has been invited to engage in a study with the Massachusetts School Building Authority as it requests funds to repair Pittsfield High. 

Superintendent Latifah Phillips delivered the news to the School Building Needs Commission last week.  Pittsfield has been invited to engage in a senior study where enrollment, program, and facility issues are reviewed. 

While this is a good sign, it doesn't mean that PPS's proposal was accepted. 

"We're still not invited into the grant program, but this is still a positive step," Phillips said. 

The city is pursuing a statement of interest to the MSBA, a quasi-independent government agency, to cover up to 80 percent of the cost for renovations. 

In July, the School Committee received a report card on the 1931 building's physical condition, which was described as "poor" and in need of restoration to its original character.

The senior study team will have consultants and senior architects with extensive knowledge of building systems and educational programs, Phillips said. They will visit PHS and Taconic for a few hours at the end of September. 

A summation of the 284,301-square-foot building at 300 East St. describes it as being "in poor condition overall," but the condition of the finishes and overall quality of the school is said to reflect the age at which it was constructed. 

"The site has issues with its asphalt paving, causing accessibility and safety concerns. The fields are in good condition. The sidewalks around the building appear to be in poor condition, with accessibility updates necessary. ADA ramps are in poor condition," it reads. 

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories