image description
Outgoing Councilor at Large Karen Kalinowksy, Ward 2 Councilor Charles Kronick, Ward 3 Councilor Kevin Sherman and Ward 7 Councilor Anthony Maffuccio were presented with plaques recognizing their service on the council.

Pittsfield Council Closes Term With Tax Rate Approvals

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

Councilors on Tuesday debate the tax shift differential for fiscal 2024 before voting 6-4 to approve as presented. 

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — Despite the pain of raising taxes, a majority of the City Council members agreed that it is their responsibility to approve 2024 tax classification so that the city doesn't fall behind.

The council approved during its last meeting of the term a residential shift factor of 0.8151 that will result in a residential rate of $18.45 per $1,000 of valuation and a commercial rate of $39.61 per $1,000. This is a 13 cent, or 0.7 percent, increase from 2023 for residential and a 40 cent, or one percent, increase for commercial, industrial, and personal property.

An average home valued at $267,914 will pay an estimated $4,943 in property taxes, representing a $397.82 increase from the previous year when the average home value was $248,100. This amounts to about $33 additional dollars a month.    

Ward 3 Councilor Kevin Sherman, who did not seek re-election, will not miss voting on this item.

"I am going to support this rate in order to pay the bills," he said. "I hate it."

The item had been tabled from the last council meeting in hopes that the city's free cash would be certified in time for the vote, as using more of the funds to offset the taxpayer burden had been proposed. Free cash has not yet been certified so it was not an option.

Ward 6 Councilor Dina Lampiasi said the responsible choice is to move the rates along, as not setting them will result in the city having to borrow money and will cost more.

"We have to be realistic about the time restrictions the tax collector is under and we also have to take into account that we don't have free cash certified. There are real reasons why there isn't a true alternate tonight," she said.

"But I will say that the residents I'm hearing from are frustrated that free cash hasn't been more a part of the conversation and I think it's clear that most of us councilors wanted that to be true and I just ask that the future administrations make that effort to have free cash certified sooner."

She added that it didn't seem like there was an effort to have free cash a part of the conversations and for residents to trust the city's spending of taxes, they need to have all of the information.  

The motion passed 6-4 with Councilor at Large Karen Kalinowksy, Ward 1 Councilor Kenneth Warren, Ward 2 Councilor Charles Kronick, and Ward 7 Councilor Anthony Maffuccio in opposition. Councilor at Large Earl Persip was absent.


Kronick unsuccessfully motioned to change the shift factor to 0.8274, which would further increase residential bills and decrease commercial bills, and to request that the mayor appropriate $3 million from the general fund to offset the tax rate.

He suspected that the administration anticipated a request for free cash and deliberately suppressed that information.

"That's how it looks to me so therefore I suspect it," he said. "If I see a picture I'm going to say what it looks like."

President Peter Marchetti, who is the mayor-elect, pointed out that there were not any formal requests for free cash two weeks ago when the item was tabled.

"I would say to you what I said throughout the entire campaign process is when we keep saying that we didn't do anything for the residents, we have $7 1/2 million worth of roadwork happening right now that is not in this budget and it's not in the budget for the next 20 years in terms of debt service," he said.

"So there are multiple ways of utilizing free cash to benefit the taxpayer, not just putting it to the tax rate."

Warren asked that the city look into a residential exemption for the future, which is an option that shifts the tax burden within the residential class from owners of moderately valued properties to owners of vacation homes, higher-valued homes, and residential properties not occupied by the owner.

He also looked into other options for lowering the metrics, explaining that "the fact of the matter is tax relief is not crazy."

Ward 5 Councilor Patrick Kavey said the council is "stuck between a rock and a hard place" because it narrowly approved a budget with a 9 percent increase, which he did not support, and has to pay its bills so that residents don't get a larger bill in May.

"Although I didn't fully agree with how large our budget was, I still see this as our financial obligation to pay our bills," he said.

Because this was the last council meeting of this term, Sherman, Kalinowksy, Kronick and Maffuccio were presented with plaques for their time serving the city. All four will be leaving office after this term. 


Tags: fiscal 2024,   property taxes,   tax classification,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Lanesborough Planners Bring STR, ADU, Signage Bylaws for Town Vote

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

LANESBOROUGH, Mass. — The Planning Board held a public hearing on the much anticipated bylaws for short-term rentals, accessory dwelling units, and signage to be presented at the annual town meeting.

For the past few months, planners have diligently been working on wordage of the new bylaws after Second Drop Farm's short-term rental was given a cease and desist because the building inspector said town bylaws don't support them.

The draft bylaw can be found on the website.

The board voted on each of the four articles and heard public comment before moving to entertain any amendments brought forward.

A lot of discussion in the STR section was around parking. Currently the drafted bylaw for parking states short-term rentals require two parking spaces, and with three or more bedrooms, require three spaces but never more than five.

There were questions about the reasons for limiting parking and how they will regulate parking renters choose to park on the lawn or the street. Planners said it is not their call, that is up to the property owner and if it is a public street that would be up to the authorities.

Some attendees called for tighter regulation to make sure neighborhoods are protected from overflow.

Lynn Terry said she lives next to one of the rented houses on Narragansett Avenue and does not feel safe with all of the cars that are parked there. She said there can be up to 10 at a time on the narrow road, and that some people have asked to use her driveway to park. She thinks limiting to five cars based on the house, is very important.

The wordage was amended to say a parking space for each bedroom of the house.

Rich Cohen brought up how his own STR at the Old Stone School helps bring in money and helps to preserve the historic landmark. He told the board he liked what they did and wants to see it pass at town meeting, knowing it might be revised later on.

He said the bylaws now should not be a "one size fits all" but may need to be adjusted to help protect neighborhoods and also preserve places like his.

After asking the audience of fewer than 20 people, the board decided to amend the amount of time an short-term rental can be reserved to 180 days total a year in a residential zone, and 365 days a year in every other zone. This was in the hopes the bylaw will be passed and help to deter companies from buying up properties to run STRs as well as protecting the neighborhood character and stability.

They also capped the stay limit of a guest to 31 days.

Cohen also asked them to add "if applicable" to the Certificate of Inspection rule as the state's rules might change and it can help stop confusion if they have incorrect requirement that the state doesn't need.

The ADU portion did not have much public comment but there were some minor amendments because of notes from KP Law, the town counsel.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories