Dalton Select Board OKs Nonresident Board Policy

By Sabrina DammsiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story
DALTON, Mass. — The Select Board voted last week to allow nonresidents to volunteer on town committees. 
 
The town does not currently have a policy restricting non-residents from serving.
 
Nonresidents have been serving on some of board and committees because they have been able to provide certain expertise, Town Manager Thomas Hutcheson said. 
 
Other towns have restricted nonresidents from serving in an effort to add "guardrails" and prevent volunteers from giving advice in bad faith, he said.
 
Although he does not believe that any of the nonresidents currently serving on town committees are acting in bad faith, he said the board can consider a policy preventing nonresidents from being on the committee in the future. 
 
"It might be something that the town would like to have Daltonians on town-of-Dalton committees as they're giving advice for the town," Hutcheson said. 
 
Board member Robert W. Bishop Jr. said he does not see a problem allowing nonresidents to serve.
 
When he was the chair of the Conservation Commission there was a member from Pittsfield who was a huge "asset."
 
They could not find anyone in Dalton interested in joining the commission, he said, and that the woman served on the commission for six or seven years, and during that time did a really good job.  
 
These remarks were echoed by Select Board member John Boyle who noted the Farm and Forestry Commission has a nonresident member, J. Dicken Crane of Windsor, who has provided his expertise. 
 
"I am good with the current policy. If there's a specific opening and there's a person available that can provide the expertise and there's no one from Dalton I have no problem but somebody else sitting in," Boyle said. 
 
The Farm and Forestry Commission has four members and three vacant seats. 
 
Town Assistant Alyssa Maschino said she works with a number of committees that have vacancies due to lack of volunteers. 
 
"There's vacancies on eight committees so it's not like there's a whole bunch of people knocking on the door begging to join committees," Maschino said. 
 
"So, I feel in my personal opinion if a Pittsfield resident or a different town resident has an interest joining a committee and is willing to help the town I don't see how that is a problem."
 
Maschino is also the chair of the Cultural Council and is the ADA Committee coordinator.

Tags: town boards,   volunteers,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Pittsfield Seeks $28M Borrowing for Water, Sewer Infrastructure

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The city is seeking a total of $28 million in borrowing authorizations to upgrade its drinking and wastewater infrastructure. 

This includes $13 million for upgrades to the wastewater treatment plant and $15 million for upgrades to the Cleveland and Ashley Water Treatment Plants, which are located outside Pittsfield. The City Council referred the $15 million borrowing request to the Finance Subcommittee on Tuesday. 

The full drinking water project is expected to cost $165 million over the next 8 years, with $150 million for long-term construction and $15 million for near-term needs. The initial ask would fund the final design and permitting for Phases 1-3, Phase 1 of interim updates, allowances, and contingency. 

After the meeting, Commissioner of Public Services and Utilities Ricardo Morales explained that these are needed repairs so the current infrastructure can be stretched a little longer while design work is underway.

Pittsfield's two Krofta drinking water treatment plants were installed in the 1980s. The city says they are beyond anticipated useful service and at risk for catastrophic failure that could leave Pittsfield with a shortage of potable water. 

Krofta is a compact filtration system that Pittsfield will continue to use. There are four units at the Cleveland WTP and two at the Ashley WTP.  Morales said the system is "very good" but needs to be upgraded. 

"We were one of the first to use that type of technology in the 80s, and it's outdated now, and getting parts and getting repairs to it is very costly because of the outdated technology that it's using, and we can replace that with better infrastructure," he explained. 

"We need to build a chemical facility on the Cleveland side. We already have that done at Ashley with [American Rescue Plan Act] funds, largely, and then we need to build better tank holding systems at the plants to allow for fluorination to happen at the plant, instead of on its way down to Pittsfield." 

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories