Federal Cuts That Will Hit Your Wallet, Your Workplace, & Your Community

By Deborah LeonczykGuest Column
Print Story | Email Story
 
Congress is considering cuts that would eliminate the Community Services Block Grant (CSBG) and deeply reduce the Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP). These proposals may look like budget decisions on paper — but here in the Berkshires, they will have immediate, tangible consequences.
 
If you think these programs don't affect you, think again. Whether you run a business, teach in a school, work in health care, pay property taxes, or simply live in a neighborhood — you will feel the impact.
 
CSBG and LIHEAP aren't just safety nets. They are economic stabilizers that protect working families, support local spending, and reduce pressure on emergency systems. When these programs disappear, so do jobs, consumer dollars, and community stability.
 
At Berkshire Community Action Council, CSBG is the core funding that allows us to meet local needs in real time. It helps keep 2,300 children warm each winter through our Children's Clothing Program. It supports our Food Depot, which supplies pantries across the county. It funds the Volunteer Income Tax Assistance (VITA) program, which helps low- and moderate-income residents claim refunds and tax credits — money that goes straight back into our local economy.
 
CSBG also fills the gaps no other funding can. It allows us to respond when a family faces eviction, when a senior can't afford transportation to a medical appointment, or when someone falls behind on a utility bill through no fault of their own. If this funding disappears, so does that flexibility — and so do those services.
 
LIHEAP, meanwhile, provides heating assistance to over 8,000 Berkshire households every year. That's not a statistic — it's a full quarter of our population. In a region with long, harsh winters, LIHEAP is not optional. It keeps homes warm, children safe, and older adults healthy.
 
LIHEAP also pays for emergency heating system repairs and replacements, ensuring that families don't face life-threatening cold with a broken furnace. When LIHEAP is cut, fuel assistance drops, repair services decline, and households are forced to choose between heat and other essentials.
 
You may not receive LIHEAP or CSBG support, but you will feel their loss:
  • If you're an employer, you'll see more missed shifts, transportation issues, and distracted workers juggling crises that used to be managed quietly and effectively.
  • If you're in education, you'll notice more children arriving unprepared for the weather, unfocused in class, or struggling with basic needs.
  • If you work in healthcare or public safety, you'll encounter more avoidable emergencies — illnesses from unheated homes, stress-related health problems, and increased pressure on ERs and shelters.
  • If you're a taxpayer, you'll pay more for local services that must pick up the slack — from emergency housing to crisis response.
  • If you run a small business, expect fewer customers. VITA refunds won't flow into local stores. Fewer heating oil deliveries will mean less work for contractors. Spending drops when families are in survival mode.
These aren't theoretical outcomes — they are predictable economic consequences of removing basic protections.
 
Some will argue these programs should be scaled back to "cut costs." But that ignores the cost of doing nothing. When CSBG and LIHEAP prevent a crisis, they save money downstream — on hospital stays, shelter placements, court proceedings, and lost productivity. It is far more expensive to respond after the fact than to prevent hardship in the first place.
 
And it's not just about economics. It's about who we are as a community. These programs reflect our shared values: that children should go to school warm, that no one should freeze in their home, and that help should be available when it's needed most.
 
That's why I'm urging our federal delegation — Sens. Elizabeth Warren and Ed Markey, and Congressman Richard Neal — to protect CSBG and LIHEAP from elimination or reduction. These are not fringe programs. They are foundational supports in rural regions like the Berkshires.
 
I'm also asking you, the reader, to take action. Call your legislators. Share your story. Donate or volunteer if you're able. These programs work because they are local, responsive, and rooted in community. Losing them would be a blow not only to the families who rely on them — but to the entire regional economy we all depend on.
 
When we lose safety nets like CSBG and LIHEAP, the most vulnerable fall first — and without intervention, we all fall further, and the cost of recovery is one we all share.
 
Deborah Leonczyk is executive director Berkshire Community Action Council.

 


Tags: BCAC,   LIHEAP,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Possible Measles Exposure at Boston, Logan

BOSTON — The Massachusetts Department of Public Health confirmed Wednesday that an out-of-state adult visitor who spent time in Boston and Westborough earlier this month was diagnosed with measles and was present in a number of locations.
 
This could have resulted in other people being exposed to measles virus.
 
The visitor arrived at Logan International Airport on American Airlines flight 2384 from Dallas-Fort Worth, Texas, on Dec. 11 at 2:39 p.m. They stayed at the DoubleTree by Hilton Hotel Boston-Westborough in Westborough and departed the state on Dec. 12 via Logan at 9:19 p.m. on JetBlue flight 117 to Las Vegas.
 
DPH is working with the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and local partners to identify and notify those who may have been exposed to measles from this individual.
 
"Measles is a highly contagious, airborne disease, which has increased significantly in the United States because of the unfortunate decrease in vaccination rates. It is also a preventable disease," said Public Health Commissioner Dr. Robbie Goldstein. "This current situation serves as an important reminder of the critical role vaccination plays in protecting our communities. While Massachusetts has not had a measles case this year, 2025 saw the highest number of nationwide cases in more than a decade — nearly 2,000 in 44 jurisdictions, and sadly, three deaths. 
 
"Fifteen years ago, measles had been considered eliminated in the United States, but that tremendous progress is at risk. Vaccines are one of the most important public health interventions ever — they are safe, effective, and lifesaving."
 
Measles is very contagious. However, the risk to most people in Massachusetts is low because the vaccination rate in the state is high. People who are not immune and visited any of the locations on the following dates and times may be at risk for developing measles.
 
View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories