BRTA to Update Bylaws After Complaint

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The BRTA board met last week to update its bylaws and resolve an Open Meeting Law complaint.

Earlier this month the BRTA Advisory Board met to discuss an Open Meeting Law complaint expressed by board member Rene Wood who alleged that the search for a new authority administrator "was not properly noticed for the average person to understand." 

Her complaint stated that no agenda posted for a search committee meeting in July when potential candidates were moved forward, and insufficient information was provided for the June meeting during which members were appointed to the task. 

Last week, the meeting started with a board member Ray Killeen saying excluding the public was not his intention.

"It wasn't discussed, but I'd like to add within minutes that there was no intent to exclude anyone from the meeting, and anything considered just an error or small misunderstanding on our part, but I just want to make note there was no intent to exclude anyone, that's my opinion," said Killeen. 

BRTA Administrator Robert Malnati touched on the amendments to the bylaws, which have not been updated since 2013. Malnati said staff went to work right after the meeting to address Wood's complaint.

"Based on the information that we talked about at the board meeting, the applicants were emailed out to the board members, and the current bylaws were emailed out to the board members with instructions that you have suggestions on edits for the bylaws," Malnati said.

The edits that were sent by members will be considered when the new document is updated. The complaint also asked the process for selecting a new administrator be updated, This time, each board member was sent applicants resumes with unique identifiers instead of names and each were asked to rank the candidates for to review in last Thursday's meeting.

Malnati also reviewed the bylaws and came to a resolution.

"Later on the afternoon, I sent an email to the board with a unique identifier and the resume of the party that had applied past the cutoff, published deadline, and then at the end of that day, later in the evening, received an email from the complainant saying we addressed all issues, and I believe we came up with a resolution accepted," he said.

Wood made a motion to have the first draft of the BRTA bylaws done by KP Law, which was quoted to not exceed $2,500.

Wood also asked to add an amendment to bring a non-voting member of the Berkshire Regional Planning Commission to the advisory committee. 

It was also mentioned to make the location of the meeting and agenda more accessible.

The board is also required to attend an Open Meeting Law training to which Malnati has already completed and received certification.


Tags: BRTA,   open meeting complaint,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Pittsfield Company Fined for Asbestos Violations

BOSTON — The Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection has issued a $17,400 penalty to Pittsfield-based Barile Environmental Inc. for asbestos violations that occurred during abatement services at an office building located at 23 Lewis Ave. in Great Barrington.  
 
MassDEP discovered the violations during inspections of the office building in October 2025. Barile failed to follow appropriate asbestos work practices and controls during its asbestos abatement activities at the building site. MassDEP inspections of the facility revealed that Barile personnel were removing asbestos-containing siding in violation of state asbestos regulations.  
 
"MassDEP enforces asbestos regulations so that management of asbestos-containing materials is completed safely," said Michael Gorski, director of MassDEP’s Western Regional Office in Springfield. "This consent order requires payment of a substantial penalty and could have been avoided if the proper work practices were followed." 
 
Following MassDEP's order, Barile has completed the required cleanup actions and must pay $14,000 of the $17,400 penalty to resolve the violations. The balance of the penalty is suspended pending compliance with the remaining administrative terms of the order.  
 
Property owners or contractors with questions about asbestos-containing materials, notification requirements, proper removal, handling, packaging, storage, and disposal procedures, or MassDEP asbestos regulations are encouraged to contact the appropriate MassDEP Regional Office for assistance.  
View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories