Lanesborough Planning Deliberates Sign & STR Bylaws

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

LANESBOROUGH, Mass. — The Planning Board is a step closer to finishing draft bylaws for short-term rentals (STR) and signage to be voted at the annual town meeting.

The planners took up the bylaws  after contentious interpretations by the town of the existing signage bylaw and over the lack of STR regulations. 

They started work on the drafts in February but some elements were tabled for this month's meeting, held last week. 

They first rewrote the parking at a rental to three or more rooms must have three spaces and two or fewer rooms having two spots.

The board debated on the definition section, which was tabled last month. After some deliberation, members decided to remove a requirement for all short-term rentals to prominently display signage containing the owners' name, property address, 24-hour contact information for the property manager, and legal occupancy limit of the building.

Member Joe Trybus argued that the enforcer, Building Commissioner Brian Duval, should be the contact and that owners shouldn't have their information out there for anyone to contact.

They also discussed the registration and inspection sections, rewording and adding some language to state: All operators of short-term rentals shall register with the town clerk, who shall maintain a registry of all approved STRs in the town of Lanesborough, and may set reasonable fees for maintenance of registry applications for registrations shall include the following, owner name and property address, local property management and contact information, copy of currently valid STR certificate of registration with Massachusetts Department of Revenue, copy of current valid certificate of inspection from the building commissioner.

Chair Courtney Dondi said she agreed the town should be the one to decide on the fees.

The members debated how they should write the ownership and entity limits. Trybus argued that non-owner occupied buildings would be limited to one STR in a residential zone while Leanne Yinger thought it should be based on units, not the building.

The board determined an owner-occupied property in a residential zone could rent all units on that property short-term, though there were  couple no votes on this.

It also finished the purpose and intent section stating: This section regulates short-term rentals, STRs of residential properties in a way that clarifies where these uses are allowed in Lanesborough and regulates them in a manner that retains the character and safety of neighborhoods and the community while preserving an important resource for the local tourism dependent business community. 

Members plan to review these new changes with the expectation of finalizing them on April 13.

The board had also discussed signage bylaws at the last meeting and completed language on the sizes and limits.

There will be one banner per business that must be attached to the building. The total banner area must not exceed 25 percent of the street-facing façade. 

Open, closed, and  menu signs will be explicitly allowed as part of normal business signage and businesses can only have one sandwich board (A-frame) sign. These will be a max of 36 inches high and a max 12 square foot of the total area.

One feather flag would be allowed per business with a maximum size of 12-feet high and 3-feet wide. Inflatable tube men will not be allowed.


Tags: bylaws,   short-term rentals,   signage,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Letter: Real Issue in Hinsdale Is Leadership Failure

Letter to the Editor

To the Editor:

The Hinsdale Select Board recently claimed they are "flabbergasted" by the Dalton Police Department's decision to suspend mutual aid. This public display of confusion is staggering. It reveals a severe lack of leadership and a deep disconnect from the established facts.

Dalton did not make a rash or emotional choice. They made a strict, calculated decision to protect their own officers. Dalton leadership clearly stated their reasons. They cited deep concerns about officer safety, trust, training consistency, and post-incident accountability. These are massive red flags for any law enforcement agency.

These concerns stem directly from the fatal shooting of Biagio Kauvil. During this tragic event, Hinsdale command staff failed to follow their own policies. We saw poor judgment, tactical errors, and clear supervisory failures. When a police department breaks its own rules, it places both the public and responding officers at strict risk. No responsible outside agency will subject its own team to a command structure that lacks basic operational competence.

For elected officials to look at a preventable tragedy, clear policy violations, and the swift withdrawal of a neighboring agency, yet still claim confusion, shows willful blindness. If the Select Board cannot recognize the obvious institutional failures staring them in the face, they disqualify themselves from providing meaningful oversight.

We cannot accept leaders who dismiss documented failures and deflect blame. We must demand true accountability. The real problem is not that Dalton withdrew its support. The real problem is a Hinsdale leadership team that refuses to face its own failures.

Scott McGowan
Williamstown Mass.

 

 

 

 

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories