image description
The Board of Health on Wednesday voted to support efforts to pressure 'peaker' plant owners to switch to greener energy.

Pittsfield Health Board Supports Peaker Plant's Switch to Clean Energy

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

Dr. Henry Rose and Jane Winn of the Berkshire Environmental Action Team give a presentation on local 'peaker' power plants to the Board of Health.

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Board of Health on Wednesday voted to back local environmentalists' efforts in converting three so-called "peaker" power plants in Berkshire County to green energy.

The panel unanimously agreed to support a professional statement written by the Berkshire Environmental Action Team in support of the transfer from fossil fuels and to promote engagement with plant owners.

This will include facilitating conversation with Hull Street Energy, owners of Pittsfield Generating plant, who have not responded to BEAT's requests for a meeting.

A Berkshire Environmental Action Team campaign "Put Peakers in the Past" is demanding that the three peaking power plants located in Berkshire County revert to only renewable and clean alternatives. "Peaking" plants are used to meet periods of high energy demand.
 
The three-decades-old plants at Pittsfield Generating Co. on Merrill Road, the Eversource substation on Doreen Street, and the EP Energy plant on Woodland Road in Lee run off fossil fuels such as natural gas, oil, and kerosene.

BEAT Executive Director Jane Winn and retired physician Dr. Henry Rose gave a presentation to the panel that outlined the plants, the emissions associated with them, and the plants' air quality permitting.

Winn said these plants run 5 percent of the time or less yet make up a considerable amount of the city's emissions. Reportedly, the Doreen Street and Lee plants run less than one percent of the time.

Pittsfield Generating accounted for 15 percent of Pittsfield's entire stationary emissions — or 60,000 metric tons — in 2018.

"And these facilities are very expensive for our electric ratepayers in the Berkshires," she added. "We pay billions of dollars to keep them on standby and when they do run, they're some of the most expensive electricity generations that we have."

Reportedly, residents pay for these plants unknowingly through Eversource electric bills.

Winn also identified health impacts related to fossil fuel pollution that include reduced lung function, asthma, cardiovascular disease, pre-term birth, and premature death with children and elderly being most vulnerable.

"You might not be able to see it, you might not be able to smell it, but it's out there and it's causing problems," Rose said about the emissions.


According to a Berkshire Regional Planning Commission study, Winn added, life expectancy in the Morningside area where Pittsfield Generating is located is about 71 years whereas the average in Pittsfield is 79.5 years.

Pittsfield Generating has applied for the renewal of an air quality permit but the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection has agreed to hold at least one public hearing on the plant.

Alternatives to peakers include demand response or "peak-shaving" in which customers avoid energy use during peak demand, grid storage that uses solar plus storage to produce and store clean energy, and Mass Save's  "Connected Solutions" program that allows electric customers to use battery storage alternatives to replace power plants.

Winn said BEAT has tried to facilitate a conversation with the owners of Pittsfield Generating many times and they have not answered while the other plant owners have.  

After sending a well-received letter signed by local legislators to the owners of Doreen Street and Woodland Road, they were able to meet with them last month and discuss options for clean energy.

Chairman Alan Kulberg asked Winn if there are disadvantages to using solar batteries, to which she said there are downsides to the usage of batteries but they do not equate to the negatives that fossil fuels present.

Members advocating for these plants to switch to cleaner energy solutions include the Berkshire Brigades, the Berkshire Women's Action Group, Indivisible Pittsfield, and Lee's Board of Selectmen and Greener Gateway Committee.
 
At the board's next meeting, members will likely work on drafting a letter in support of the initiative.


Tags: BOH,   power plants,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Pittsfield Seeks $28M Borrowing for Water, Sewer Infrastructure

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The city is seeking a total of $28 million in borrowing authorizations to upgrade its drinking and wastewater infrastructure. 

This includes $13 million for upgrades to the wastewater treatment plant and $15 million for upgrades to the Cleveland and Ashley Water Treatment Plants, which are located outside Pittsfield. The City Council referred the $15 million borrowing request to the Finance Subcommittee on Tuesday. 

The full drinking water project is expected to cost $165 million over the next 8 years, with $150 million for long-term construction and $15 million for near-term needs. The initial ask would fund the final design and permitting for Phases 1-3, Phase 1 of interim updates, allowances, and contingency. 

After the meeting, Commissioner of Public Services and Utilities Ricardo Morales explained that these are needed repairs so the current infrastructure can be stretched a little longer while design work is underway.

Pittsfield's two Krofta drinking water treatment plants were installed in the 1980s. The city says they are beyond anticipated useful service and at risk for catastrophic failure that could leave Pittsfield with a shortage of potable water. 

Krofta is a compact filtration system that Pittsfield will continue to use. There are four units at the Cleveland WTP and two at the Ashley WTP.  Morales said the system is "very good" but needs to be upgraded. 

"We were one of the first to use that type of technology in the 80s, and it's outdated now, and getting parts and getting repairs to it is very costly because of the outdated technology that it's using, and we can replace that with better infrastructure," he explained. 

"We need to build a chemical facility on the Cleveland side. We already have that done at Ashley with [American Rescue Plan Act] funds, largely, and then we need to build better tank holding systems at the plants to allow for fluorination to happen at the plant, instead of on its way down to Pittsfield." 

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories