Williamstown Fire District Moving to Acquire New OPM for Station Project

By Stephen DravisiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story
WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass. — More than two years after choosing an owner's project manager for its new station project, the Fire District is set to move forward with a new OPM.
 
Prudential Committee Chair David Moresi mentioned the move during his report to the annual Fire District meeting on Tuesday at Williamstown Elementary School.
 
"We are very pleased with the most recent [construction cost] estimates projected, as well as what we consider to be a significant cost savings by soliciting for a new OPM," Moresi said during his address to the meeting.
 
After the half-hour meeting concluded, Moresi confirmed that the protracted negotiations with Colliers International on a final contract for management services were a sign that things might not work out with the firm.
 
"As I've said from Day 1, it's our goal to do this project in a fiscally responsible way," Moresi said. "We felt [the negotiations] were not heading in the direction of our best interest."
 
The good news is that the five-member Prudential Committee could select a new OPM as soon as Wednesday.
 
Moresi said the district's Building Committee received four responses from its Request for Qualifications, vetted those proposals and voted to recommend the Prudential Committee enter negotiations with Skanska Construction, which has a regional office in Boston.
 
"They're a known entity in the area," Moresi said of Skanska. "They've been involved in a lot of quality projects."
 
Skanska was recently selected as OPM for the Wahconah Park project and oversaw the construction of the new Taconic High School in Pittsfield.
 
The Fire District's project was a focus throughout Tuesday's annual meeting.
 
Moresi opened his remarks by quipping that it had been a "pretty quiet" year for the district, before "reminding" himself that, in fact, it was an eventful 12 months indeed.
 
"We received overwhelming town voter approval for our new station," he said. "It was truly a historic year for the district, and the town made it clear it wants the district to continue meeting the needs of the town for many years to come."
 
Building Committee Chair K. Elaine Neely told the meeting that her panel remains hard at work at achieving its three goals: "a facility that provides for the operating needs of the district for 50 years," meets the town's net-zero carbon emissions goal and does it all "at the lowest possible cost."
 
The meeting members breezed through the 12-article meeting warrant with hardly a question and no dissenting votes as it approved the district's operating budget and one-time expenditures for fiscal year 2024.
 
Prior to the meeting, the district held its annual election. Twenty-eight voters cast ballots in the two uncontested races. John Notsley won another three years on the Prudential Committee by a vote of 28-0, and Paul Harsch was returned as district moderator for three years by a vote of 23-0 with five blank ballots.
 
"Congratulations to Mr. Notsley and Mr. Harsch," Harsch joked before moving on to the main business of the evening.
 
In addition to hearing reports from Moresi and Neely, the meeting heard from the district's recently appointed treasurer, Billie Jo Sawyer, who reported that the district's free cash for FY22 has been certified by the commonwealth and its audit report once again came back clean.
 
Jeffrey Thomas, the chair of a public advisory panel he created with Notsley in 2019 for the district, addressed the small crowd to encourage the Fire District to continue spreading the word about its benefit to residents.
 
"There isn't sufficient awareness in this community for what the Fire District does and all the sacrifices volunteers make to keep our community safe," Thomas said. "[Awareness has] improved, and the turnout at the special district meeting was proof of that. But don't rest on your laurels. Don't let up in getting the word out about what you do.
 
"People have short memories. People come in and out of town. Far too many of us are aware of you only when we need you. That's important to change, especially when the property tax bills come in in a few years."
 
Moresi's remarks indicated that higher awareness of the district may be paying off in other ways, beyond the vote on the building.
 
"The district has witnessed positive improvements, seeing our numbers grow," Moresi said, noting that more call-volunteer firefighters were recruited both from town residents and the student population at Williams College. "As Chief [Craig] Pedercini put it recently, 'It is great to show up at a scene and see more personnel at the scene.'
 
"I am confident, with the coming of a new station, this upward trend will continue."

Tags: annual meeting,   fire district,   fiscal 2024,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Letter: Vote No on 'Jungle' Primaries

Letter to the Editor

To the Editor:

They don't call them "jungle primaries" for nothing.

Question 3 on the November ballot would trash two-party primary elections and replace them with California-style, chaotic — and extraordinarily costly — "jungle" primaries that would destroy the very political parties that have kept America stable since Alexander Hamilton, Thomas Jefferson, and James Madison created them in the 1790s.

Jungle primaries put all candidates, regardless of party, on one ballot with the top two vote-getters facing off in the general election — even if they're from the same party. That would create chaos, but the real issue is money: Jungle primaries give a distinct advantage to candidates backed by corporate money and the super wealthy. In short, jungle primaries move our primaries from the ballot box to big donor meetings long before campaigning even begins.

When something this radical is proposed, you have to look at who's behind it, who's funding it, and ask "why" they are doing it.

Their philosophical guru is Danielle Allen, a Harvard professor who ran for governor in 2022 but couldn't get 15 percent of the Democratic Convention vote to win the party's endorsement.

The money behind this extreme attack on small "d" democratic politics tells us more. With over $5 million in the bank as of Aug. 28, this is a very well-funded campaign — the lion's share of which came from wealthy Boston-area private equity individuals.

Twenty-two private equity executives gave $3.99 million, or 77 percent of all the money from individuals. Current and former Bain Capital executives contributed $1.92 million, and Berkshire Partners executives put up $1.32 million. In short, 22 rich people put up nearly $4 million to change how five million of us vote. Yes, it seems the ultra-wealthy want to destroy the two-party system that has kept our politics stable for 200 years.

View Full Story

More Williamstown Stories