image description
Superintendent Joseph Curtis speaks at Monday's meeting of the Middle School Restructuring Committee.

Pittsfield to Decide Crosby/Conte Feasibility Study in October

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — City and school officials are expected to vote on a feasibility study for the Crosby Elementary School rebuild by Halloween.

On Monday, Superintendent Joseph Curtis gave an overview of the study's timeline and components. It would determine the feasibility of rebuilding Conte Community School and Crosby on the West Street site with shared facilities.

"We at this point, do not know the feasibility study will actually occur," he told the Middle School Restructuring Committee.

"There has to be discussions of the School Building Needs Commission, who is actually meeting [Tuesday night], there has to be discussion with the School Committee, and then finally, approval by the City Council by roughly Oct. 31 to fund the feasibility study."

The study, estimated to cost about $1.5 million, is a part of the 80 percent reimbursable costs from the Massachusetts School Building Authority, which accepted the project into its queue late last year.

The Crosby/Conte plan has the potential to house grades prekindergarten to first grade in one school and Grades 2 to 4 in another, with both maintaining their own identities and administrations.

Curtis explained that what begins now is a 270-day timeline with a "whole host of tasks" that have to be completed in that window.

"The Massachusetts School Building Authority (MSBA) Feasibility Study is a key phase in the process of addressing the needs of public school buildings in Massachusetts. It is a collaborative effort between the MSBA and the participating school district to identify the most appropriate and cost-effective solution to a school facility problem," an overview provided by the Pittsfield Public Schools explains.

"The Feasibility Study ensures that the district and the MSBA have a well-researched and collaborative plan for addressing the school facility's needs. It provides a framework for designing a solution that signs with education goals, meets community expectations, and is financially responsible."

Curtis pointed to bullet points in the overview that address education program development and evaluation of alternatives.  

The district needs to develop an Educational Program Plan that includes space requirements, program offerings, curriculum goals, and enrollment projections. Multiple options are to be considered including the renovation of the existing building, renovation with an addition, full replacement of the school building, and other potential solutions.



The project is centered around Crosby and the assessments would be done on its site.

Last year, the district conducted an extensive study of the district with DRA architects that included attendance zones and grade spans. This was in preparation to submit a statement of interest for Crosby and shares similarities with the feasibility study.

"This feasibility study will re-suggest some of the things you're looking at right now, could there be different options, different possibilities?" Curtis explained.

"You've seen in the past, our study suggested hopefully reducing to three attendance zones with dual campuses for each at elementary school. That might be a recommendation of this feasibility study, it might not."

Running parallel to the Crosby proposal are the efforts of the Middle School Restructuring Committee, which is expected to put recommendations in front of the School Committee next month. It has been researching grade spans and data outcomes, educational models for middle-year grade spans, and reviewing current district policies that will be affected by any grade span change.

While the Crosby project is not under the restructuring committee's purview, the efforts coincide.

"Recommendations could range from something specific to a delay in the timeline, additional study," Curtis said.

He explained that the original intention of the restructuring was to coincide with the opening of the new building but the School Committee felt it needed to be researched and addressed sooner.

The Crosby/Conte build would not be expected to be completed until 2029.


Tags: Pittsfield Public Schools,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Pittsfield Council Revisiting DEI Office Restructure

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The conversation about the DEI office renaming that was halted by a charter objection will resume on Tuesday. 

The City Council will discuss a request from Mayor Peter Marchetti to restructure the Office of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion.  

It proposes to rename the DEI office to the Office of Equity, Access, and Opportunity and merge the Human Rights Commission and Affirmative Action Committee into an Equity, Access and Opportunity Commission.

The Ordinance and Rules Subcommittee supported the changes in August, and in September, Ward 2 Councilor Cameron Cunningham delayed the vote with a charter objection. 

Pittsfield's City Code prohibits charter states that "if a single member present objects to the taking of the vote, the vote shall be postponed until the next meeting of the city council." It also stipulates that at least four members must object if it is an emergency measure.

Cunningham also submitted a petition, which was referred to O&R under Rule 27, to replace the DEI Office and the Human Rights Commission with an equity, access, and opportunity coordinator in the Department of Community Development, with formal complaints and Equal Employment Opportunity and Affirmative Action functions assigned to Human Resources.

At the last meeting, he spent more than an hour querying the mayor and chief diversity officer about functions and effectiveness of the department, wanting more quantitative data.  Cunningham proposed an ordinance that he says keeps Pittsfield's commitment to equity, access, and opportunity, "refocuses it on measurable results for our residents, and delivers it at a fraction of the current cost." 

Under this petition, the equity, access, and opportunity coordinator would be a $60,000 to $80,000 per year position.

The DEI Office's fiscal year 2027 budget was about $200,000 after cuts during budget season; $106,700 for the chief diversity officer and $58,000 for the administrative assistant. The coordinator would be appointed by the director of community development and the mayor. 

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories